According to the Bruen decision, courts and lawmakers are not allowed to use a "balancing" approach between a Constitutional right and the government's interests in furthering public safety.  Basically, your right to feel safe stops where my right to carry starts.

The test, according to SCOTUS, is (1) text -- does the conduct fall within the purview of the Second Amendment based on the language of the amendment?, and (2) is there a historical tradition where such restrictions were common (traditional)?  The years 1791 & 1868 are when you must look for historical analogous laws, such as banning carry in parks, at public events or recreation centers.  20th Century laws are not "historical" for this purpose.

So, our mayor making prohibiting carry in parks is absolutely unconstitutional and conflicts with the Bruen decision.

That's what a judge in Virginia just ruled.  So  ..... yeah.

all these sensitive places that are listed are where criminal shootings have taken place. Laws didnt work to begin with so why prohibit LAW ABIDING citizens from defending themselves.

All these anti's remind me of someone.  They think they can make up the definition of what a sensitive place is, thus making it true.

What happens when it is section 8? That would be a government program going along with a landlord who might say no guns which would mean 2nd amendment rights being denied by a government tied entity.

A federal District Court judge recently ruled that banning the lawful possession
of firearms by Public Housing residents is unconstitutional.

In a case brought against the East St. Louis Housing Authority (ESLHA), a Public
Housing resident claimed that ESLHA’s restriction against tenants having firearms
in their units violated her Second Amendment rights. The case was brought by the
Second Amendment Foundation and the Illinois State Rifle Association on behalf
of the resident.

Just wait until after the election when Biden stops tapping the strategic petroleum reserve and gas prices go to ten bucks a gallon
911 is about to become a busy signal

1911 is about to become a busy signal
FIFY
 

"Government-tied entity?"  You got a reference for the definition of that?

Now, if the government owns and operates the property, that's a totally different issue.

Federal court overturns gun bans in Public Housinghttps://affordablehousingonline.com/blog/federal-court-overturns-gun-bans-public-housing/

I was thinking something along the lines of Kamehameha school. A few years back the government cut the JROTC program out of Kamehameha Schools because of the race based admission policy. It is a private school but received government money through the JROTC program. I don't know if there is a specific term for this so I picked those words to describe it. So in this case, a landlord accepting government money would be denying a constitutional right.