HPD to hold public hearing on proposed guns rules following landmark Supreme Court decision (Read 11538 times)

punaperson

Hmmm interesting. They said they're outnumbered 20 to 1.  Anyone want to help them out?

Frickin Lee, gives us no mention or credit.  Says NRA flies lobbyists to meet with legislators and organize that 20 to 1.  I feel insulted.
You're feeling is well warranted... but I hope to hell you're not having significant emotional responses to all the inane and lying garbage spewed by those ignoramuses and deceitful authoritarian propagandists.

punaperson

Kristy is cute so she gets a pass
Kristy, you ignorant slut.

QUIETShooter

In regards to that mother who claims the daughter successfully committed suicide with a shot in the back of the head.

How da hell do you do that?  That's not easy to do.
Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

punaperson

Anyone have a link to the submitted written testimony?

Thank you.

Edit: Thanks to garandtumb on another thread.

https://www.honolulupd.org/police-services/firearms/
« Last Edit: October 05, 2022, 06:31:57 AM by punaperson »

punaperson

LOL!!  :rofl:

When 80% of a panel charged with evaluating the factual evidence to support or deny proposed changes in "procedures" re the ability to exercise a constitutionally-protected right are wearing masks, which have absolutely, via peer-reviewed published randomized controlled trials, been shown to have virtually zero effect ("no statistically significant effect") on either source control or personal protection, you know you are being led down a path to "the showers" in a "show trial" by compliant ignoramus sheep who wouldn't know either a fact nor how to find a fact if their lives depended on it. What a circus of stupid clowns. Typical Hawaii governance. Anyone wonder what their "recommendations" will be?

oldfart

Anyone have a link to the submitted written testimony?

Thank you.

Edit: Thanks to garandtumb on another thread.

https://www.honolulupd.org/police-services/firearms/
.....
I looked at most of the written testimony.
I saw a lot of rubber stamped hoplophobic anti-gun letters.
What, Me Worry?

robtmc

In regards to that mother who claims the daughter successfully committed suicide with a shot in the back of the head.

How da hell do you do that?  That's not easy to do.
Ask PIAPS

changemyoil66

In regards to that mother who claims the daughter successfully committed suicide with a shot in the back of the head.

How da hell do you do that?  That's not easy to do.

She made no claim, the claim she did make yesterday was that her daughters husband killed her.  But her FB post in 2016 about a letter to Obama stated suicide and so did her written testimony for another bill in HI.

She was also the only person outside on the steps of HPD yelling and trying to get attention.

punaperson

She made no claim, the claim she did make yesterday was that her daughters husband killed her.  But her FB post in 2016 about a letter to Obama stated suicide and so did her written testimony for another bill in HI.

She was also the only person outside on the steps of HPD yelling and trying to get attention.
She said "I lost my daughter to domestic-related gun violence." "She was killed by her husband's gun. He has not been adjudicated."

I'm willing to call that intentional distortion of the facts "lying".

changemyoil66

She said "I lost my daughter to domestic-related gun violence." "She was killed by her husband's gun. He has not been adjudicated."

I'm willing to call that intentional distortion of the facts "lying".

She's gone off the reservation, just listening to her speak outside.

Direjackalope

She's gone off the reservation, just listening to her speak outside.

I would describe her public speaking style as "Shrill"

punaperson

I'm 50 minutes into the speakers. So far 100% of those opposed to bearing arms outside the home wore masks. The "Moms Demand Action" t-shirt person took hers off to speak, but immediately put it back on when seated. So far NONE (0%) of the pro-2A speakers have worn masks.

Masked: 100% of those opposed to carry; 80% of those making the decision about the "procedures" to "qualify" for exercising a constitutional right.

Coincidence?

LOL. F*ckers.

Jl808

There were a few of us that submitted handwritten testimony to the lady that was fielding the oral testifiers.  We were there and saw that the line were going slow so we hand wrote them and submitted.  I don’t see any of them on the written testimony scans. 
I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

macsak

they may still be scanning the emails
mines and several people i know are not on the site yet

There were a few of us that submitted handwritten testimony to the lady that was fielding the oral testifiers.  We were there and saw that the line were going slow so we hand wrote them and submitted.  I don’t see any of them on the written testimony scans.

aieahound

I submitted email testimony and got the thanks for submitting auto-reply and mine is not in the written testimony scans.
I submitted at about 8 am the day of the hearing when I decided I wouldn’t make it.

changemyoil66

I submitted email testimony and got the thanks for submitting auto-reply and mine is not in the written testimony scans.
I submitted at about 8 am the day of the hearing when I decided I wouldn’t make it.

I submitted mine on 9/27 and it's not there.

drck1000

I submitted mine on 9/27 and it's not there.
You're now on the list. . . which is why the Chief came to you and spoke to you in person. . .

Yousa marked man. . .  O0

stangzilla

I submitted oct 3rd, my testimony is not there although i got confirmation that it was received

aletheuo137

It's kinda like the gay marriage thing. Doesn't matter what we want/favor, they already made their decision on the matter!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

nalo_b

I submitted testimony also on 10/3. Was trying to find the email that someone/ hifico wanted us to forward our testimonials too.