"CONNECTICUT SHOOTING" (Read 41508 times)

xer 21

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #80 on: December 17, 2012, 01:39:08 PM »
This was horrible trajedy and my heart and tears go out to all the families.

But does anyone else think it's strange that all initial (and subsequent) reports said the AR was found in the car ?

It wasn't until the coroner reported that the primary firearm was a .223 rifle that the reports changed to an AR was the firearm used.

I know a LOT of mistakes were reported initially but it seems odd that this would come from the coroner and not any of the investigators on scene.

no.  hell, first they thought it was the brother, then they thought the mother worked there, then the found the mother at home.


no one knew what was going on.

Cougar8045

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #81 on: December 17, 2012, 01:46:49 PM »
I was under the impression that entry to the school required you to ring a buzzer, which would prompt office personnel to look at you via a video camera and decide whether or not to buzz you in.  Did he force his way in, or was that report in error?
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2

macsak

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #82 on: December 17, 2012, 02:18:55 PM »
reports now say he broke in through a window

I was under the impression that entry to the school required you to ring a buzzer, which would prompt office personnel to look at you via a video camera and decide whether or not to buzz you in.  Did he force his way in, or was that report in error?

bass monkey

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #83 on: December 17, 2012, 03:06:51 PM »
Are the police reports public record?  That could  be the most accurate info

jasoncredible

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #84 on: December 17, 2012, 05:00:46 PM »
Here are the facts:

1. The were no (living) eyewitnesses that actually saw Adam Lanza firing.

2. The police report states that Adam Lanza was found shot in the chest with his weapon in his hand, but it doesn't mention powder burns. And besides, who kills themself that way anyway?

3. Several eyewitnesses initially reported seeing a mysterious man in an ballcap and sunglasses leaving the seen. Afterwards, all but one of them retracted their story and said that they were under a lot of strain and may not have actually seen this. Threatened into keeping quiet perhaps?

xer 21

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #85 on: December 17, 2012, 05:15:40 PM »
Here are the facts:

1. The were no (living) eyewitnesses that actually saw Adam Lanza firing.

2. The police report states that Adam Lanza was found shot in the chest with his weapon in his hand, but it doesn't mention powder burns. And besides, who kills themself that way anyway?

3. Several eyewitnesses initially reported seeing a mysterious man in an ballcap and sunglasses leaving the seen. Afterwards, all but one of them retracted their story and said that they were under a lot of strain and may not have actually seen this. Threatened into keeping quiet perhaps?

that's ridiculous.

roadster99

Re: Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #86 on: December 17, 2012, 05:25:37 PM »
that's ridiculous.

I posted a link in the "A Horrible Suggestion" thread from a controversial website that had compiled all the information available concerning the tragedy. There seems to be more contradictory information than you might think. My post is labeled, "tin foil hat time!"

While I'm really not one to believe that the government would stage a horrendous act such as this, it's interesting to see how one might believe so. Or at the very least get some sort of idea that it's all the result of some government conspiracy.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2012, 06:16:59 PM by roadster99 »

Jl808

"CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #87 on: December 17, 2012, 06:37:07 PM »
What about by the government within the government?
I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

TeamMidori

"CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #88 on: December 17, 2012, 07:01:26 PM »
Window? Those guys a couple days ago said dont mind the broken glass cuz the cops needed to break em. More stories....

xer 21

Re: Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #89 on: December 17, 2012, 08:42:22 PM »
I posted a link in the "A Horrible Suggestion" thread from a controversial website that had compiled all the information available concerning the tragedy. There seems to be more contradictory information than you might think. My post is labeled, "tin foil hat time!"

While I'm really not one to believe that the government would stage a horrendous act such as this, it's interesting to see how one might believe so. Or at the very least get some sort of idea that it's all the result of some government conspiracy.
i saw that.

forgive me if i dont believe anything that's written by a site called "the daily sheeple". 

especially when the evidence is at best circumstantial.

it makes for a great story, but realistically, i dont see anyway this is set up.

Bunker

Re: Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #90 on: December 17, 2012, 08:57:44 PM »
i saw that.

forgive me if i dont believe anything that's written by a site called "the daily sheeple". 

especially when the evidence is at best circumstantial.

it makes for a great story, but realistically, i dont see anyway this is set up.

I'm with you. Our government may be screwed up but neither side would ever allow innocent children to be pawns and murdered for political gain, if that is what is being implied here.

xer 21

Re: Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #91 on: December 17, 2012, 09:32:53 PM »
I'm with you. Our government may be screwed up but neither side would ever allow innocent children to be pawns and murdered for political gain, if that is what is being implied here.

that, and our government is too large.  too many people would be involved for them to keep everything under wraps.  i dont think our government is smart enough to pull off that level of a covert op on American soil.

roadster99

Re: Re: Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #92 on: December 17, 2012, 09:49:20 PM »
i saw that.

forgive me if i dont believe anything that's written by a site called "the daily sheeple". 

especially when the evidence is at best circumstantial.

it makes for a great story, but realistically, i dont see anyway this is set up.

I didn't say I believed it was. I said I just thought it was interesting. With so many conflicting reports, especially the police reporting there being more than one individual involved, I can understand how people can concoct a conspiracy theory type of conclusion. That's all my point was.

Heavies

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #93 on: December 17, 2012, 10:03:35 PM »
I'm with you. Our government may be screwed up but neither side would ever allow innocent children to be pawns and murdered for political gain, if that is what is being implied here.

Fast and Furious? ???  What about that?  I am sure many have died because of this, maybe children too.  I am not sure the gov is involved in this instance, but I am sure that these buttwipes feel that the 'ends justify the means' and don't loose one wink of sleep over it.

This country is screwed.  There are no morals, no honor, no pride, no God.  This is not taught to a majority of children, in school or at home.   This is how the imposter got re-elected.   That is why there are these mass killings occuring on a regular basis.

aieahound

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #94 on: December 18, 2012, 10:32:34 AM »
I don't think it was set up.

But I do wonder if it's being set up to make it look like the "assault rifle" was used as the primary weapon instead of the 2 handguns.

Like I said.  It's weird the police reveal the brands of the 2 handguns ( Glock and Sig Sauer )  but state the AR was found in the vehicle. Wouldn't they notice an AR lying on the floor ?

Not until the coroner says the rifle was used was it reported that the rifle was the primary weapon.

No matter how you slice it this was an unthinkable tragedy, but I wonder if they saw opportunity to go after the assault weapons ban ex post facto.

BUD

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #95 on: December 18, 2012, 01:47:14 PM »
Looks like this is the straw that will break the camels back.  Too many people mobilizing against guns.  I will be shocked it there is not some change in the very near future.  Get em while you can!
It is what it is.

Cougar8045

Re: "CONNECTICUT SHOOTING"
« Reply #96 on: December 18, 2012, 01:54:13 PM »
Looks like this is the straw that will break the camels back.  Too many people mobilizing against guns.  I will be shocked it there is not some change in the very near future.  Get em while you can!
I was feeling pretty glum today, too.  I'm heartened by the fact that the NRA just reactivated on facebook.  SAF is calling for a committee to examine violence in America; which is a huge winner.  Jay Carney is talking about how they have an opportunity to act, because people are going to be scared and emotional for a long time.  Compare and contrast: One group says "We need to act while emotions are still running high!", while another group says, "Let's sit down and have that adult conversation Baraka was talking about."  I think the side of civil rights will prevail. 

(But I also just ordered six more 30-round Pmags off Midway...)
I'm just a fluffy white bunny rabbit who lost his way. 

"If a thief be found breaking in, and be smitten that he die, there shall no blood be shed for him. ..."  -Exodus 22:2