at least one person here would argue that this would be constitutional....

https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/gosafe

at least one person here would argue that this would be constitutional....

https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/gosafe

This f*ckn crap has got to have been proposed by one of those 81 million plus voters........

Only complete stupidtards would even entertain this idiot proposal.

They are running out of time to get us ready for agenda 2030
Can't commie stomp an armed populace into submission. 

Any person proposing a new law who feels the need to tell us it's "common sense,"
you can bet the farm it's far from it.

Problem is that clueless people will see this and think it's the greatest idea since sliced bread.

Here's another article on the same legislation.
It mentions the killer in Maine was rushed by 2 people but he was able to kill both of them because the killer didn't have to re-load.

Have these tards thought about it the other way around?  Of course not.  They think not of your safety.  What if those 2 people were criminals hell bent on killing or raping you?

They do not care for citizens safety.  Never did.  Never will.  It's the agenda that drives them.  These f*ckers are enemies of the nation and of the Constitution of the United States.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gun-grab-democrat-senators-introduce-new-bill-to-restrict-semi-automatic-firearms/ar-AA1kQIc8?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=7fc42dba405c4ac69cf84df7876c4a6e&ei=87

Problem is that clueless people will see this and think it's the greatest idea since sliced bread.

How true.  My Best friend is probably celebrating about this new legislation being proposed.  This is how he thinks.

Let's keep the hk91 and ptr91 our little secret.

Don't all semi auto guns rely on some kind of gas from the ignition of the powder to cycle?  Even pistols, but handguns are excluded, so are 22 cal or less/rimfire.  So even a roller style would be banned. Bacically, this ban would be the normal AWB bill that comes up every year or so,but they're making it sound like there are some loopholes.

TBH, I hope this passes as federal stuff has a grandfather clause in them. Then SCOTUS takes up the lawsuit and AWB are settled once and for all and applies nationwide. Instead of having to go thru the district courts, then circuit courts, then maybe SCOUTS takes it up.

The fundamental problem is that this legislation tries to micromanage the crime problem with technicalities. A gatling gun is not gas operated.

The fundamental problem is that this legislation tries to micromanage the crime problem with technicalities. A gatling gun is not gas operated.

Yup, either crank by hand or electronically controlled.

Nobody could ever shoot a revolver as fast as a semi-auto handgun.  And that "pause" between shote while having to reload is going to save lives...

The general consensus is that this legislation is dead on arrival.
It's some sort of publicity stunt to attract attention or perhaps divert attention from something else.
Eg. Sleepy Joe, inflation, or perhaps some other legislation.

Yeah, in my opinion it's too ridiculous, stupid, and silly for consideration.

Must be a smoke and mirrors tactic.

Yeah, in my opinion it's too ridiculous, stupid, and silly for consideration.

Must be a smoke and mirrors tactic.

They try this every other year or so.

Yeah, in my opinion it's too ridiculous, stupid, and silly for consideration.

Must be a smoke and mirrors tactic.

Brought to you by the government that can’t solve basic problems

Yeah, in my opinion it's too ridiculous, stupid, and silly for consideration.

Must be a smoke and mirrors tactic.

These types of common nonsense bills are normally the result of a constituent asking for it to be heard.  I imagine the larger the campaign contributions the constituent and his/her friends donate, the more likely these crazy ideas are to be filed by their reps.

MDA gets a bunch of money from Bloomberg and probably Soros, too.  I'm sure a good part of that is budgeted for campaign contributions and lobbying.