https://youtube.com/shorts/RVuur_zzwPw?si=rJuCFqQKvTTzbcvm

The reasoning of an idiot should always fall on deaf ears.

Oh by the way, Hunter secured his firearm by throwing it in the rubbish can.  Like father.  Like son.

Rubbish.

When Steve Bannon calls the Biden family a pack of feral dogs I was wondering why he would pick that particular metaphor. According to people who claim to have seen what was on the laptop, some text messages that got released, and Ashley's diary after Hunter had sex with his dead brothers wife he later turned his attention towards his 14yo niece. Apparently there's topless photos of her on the laptop. Topless doing what? That remains to be seen.

Her mom tried to tell the other Bidens but they rallied around Hunter and cut her out of the picture. Apparently even with the adultery she's not depraved enough to stay in the pack.

https://headlineusa.com/biden-family-hunter-molested-niece/

If he didn't take his RX of meth (crack) every 8 hours as prescribed, then he is an unlawful user of it.  So if he waited instead 7 hours and 59 minutes, he just broke the law.  C'mon man, think about all the factors that this could be possible.

Meth isn't crack.....

Last time I checked doing meth was illegal.

There is prescription meth.

Since when is defining if someone uses drugs "technical?" 

I guess it is if you just want to argue.

Being an addict is a technical term.

please show me where he said "Since when is defining if someone is addicted to drugs "technical?"

.

Being an addict is a technical term.

Being an addict is a technical term.

So, you change your reply to address something i never said.

What's that called again?  Some sort of logical fallacy, IIRC.

So, you change your reply to address something i never said.

What's that called again?  Some sort of logical fallacy, IIRC.

What are you talking about? I didn't change my reply.

The topic was being an addict and I said "This isn't a common sense question it is a legal question and potentially a medical question." then you tried to switch topics by making it about using. I never said "using" is a technical term.

https://2ahawaii.com/index.php?topic=53760.msg482947#msg482947

please show me where he said "Since when is defining if someone is addicted to drugs "technical?"

.

I didn't say that he said that. The topic was being an addict and he said it was common sense. I disputed that claim by saying it is a technical question, not a common sense question.

Meth isn't crack.....

Captain obvious.