Trump Nominations (Read 17478 times)

changemyoil66

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #40 on: November 15, 2024, 08:36:35 AM »
First 3 nominations where decent or even good.  But the last 3 are beyond bad.   Tulsi has many questionable ties to dictators and Russia.   Her statements makes her not fit. Just like RFK. 5g doesn't cause cancer....

Can you post what statements make her not fit?

Can you post what evidence there is to ties to dictators in Russia?  I thought Russia also has only 1 dictator which is the concept of what a dictator is. So no "s" in dictators.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #41 on: November 15, 2024, 11:21:41 AM »
First 3 nominations where decent or even good.  But the last 3 are beyond bad.   Tulsi has many questionable ties to dictators and Russia.   Her statements makes her not fit. Just like RFK. 5g doesn't cause cancer....

Please show any evidence of Tulsi's "ties the dictators and Russia."

I can already predict what you will say.  My reply would be, "If simply having a conversation with someone labeled a dictator or who is the top leader of a "bad" country like Russia or Syria is characterized as "ties", then I guess every President, VP, Secretary of State, Ambassador, diplomat and other US government official can be considered to have "ties to dictators and Russia."

John Kerry Admits to Meeting Iran Leaders
During Trump Presidency

Quote
Former Secretary of State John Kerry, who is promoting his new memoir,
admitted on Wednesday that he has met with the Iranians multiple times
during Donald Trump’s presidency, although he denied that he was doing
so to save the Iran nuclear deal.
https://jewishjournal.com/news/united-states/238886/john-kerry-admits-meeting-iran-leaders-trump-presidency/

if you recall, Kerry was the person who rammed the secret deal through Congress to give Iran billions in violation of sanctions.

Foreign governments gave millions to
foundation while Clinton was at State Dept.

Quote
The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign
governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton's tenure as secretary of
state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the
Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday.

Most of the contributions were possible because of exceptions written
into the foundation’s 2008 agreement, which included limits on foreign-
government donations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/foreign-governments-gave-millions-to-foundation-while-clinton-was-at-state-dept/2015/02/25/31937c1e-bc3f-11e4-8668-4e7ba8439ca6_story.html

Whenever the Democrats accuse Republicans of unethical or unconstitutional actions, they are usually the ones doing it.

When Bill Clinton Was Paid $500,000 to Speak in Russia,
Hillary Opposed State Dept. Sanctions

Quote
Hillary Clinton sought to tamp down reports about her opposition to Russia
sanctions that coincided with a speech her husband gave in Moscow that
landed him half a million dollars.

Hillary Clinton opposed Russia sanctions in 2010 when her husband, former
President Bill Clinton, was paid to give a speech at the Russian bank
Renaissance Capital, Fox News reports.

The bank was connected to the fraud case that led to the sanctions posed
by the Magnitsky Act, and after the former president gave the speech, Russian
President Vladimir Putin called him to say thanks.

This story did not receive much attention while President Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton were pursuing their Russian "reset," but Hillary Clinton's campaign
took pains to prevent the story of Bill's speech from getting out. In 2015,
campaign operatives were able to prevent a mainstream media outlet from
reporting on it.
https://freebeacon.com/politics/bill-clinton-paid-500000-speak-russia-hillary-opposed-state-dept-sanctions/

"Ties."
« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 11:32:04 AM by Flapp_Jackson »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #42 on: November 15, 2024, 11:52:39 AM »
Former Trump cabinet member and Ambassador John Bolton, who's made a second career bashing Trump on CNN and MSNBC, said Gaetz is the worst presidential nomination is US history.

Well, i guess we'll have to go all the way back to Obama and his deputy assistant secretary of the Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition -- i.e. Nuclear Waste "Nerd" in their words.

History-making nonbinary government official is out of a job after theft accusations

Or maybe Kerry who screwed up every State Department national security issue he touched, including getting Congress to sign off on an Iran nuclear deal that he said part of which must remain secret because they involve other governments.  That's not a real thing.  Congress has clearances for such information.

Bolton in his CNN interview also said Trump refused to follow deference in the nominations.  In simpler language, that means he didn't bow down to the nominee list the Swamp wanted him to pick from.

He's poking the hornet's nest for real, and he's only been President-elect for a little more than a week.  Wait until he gets sworn in, and there's no Russia-gate BS investigation impeding his actions!

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :geekdanc: :popcorn:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

changemyoil66

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #43 on: November 15, 2024, 02:55:05 PM »
Former Trump cabinet member and Ambassador John Bolton, who's made a second career bashing Trump on CNN and MSNBC, said Gaetz is the worst presidential nomination is US history.

Well, i guess we'll have to go all the way back to Obama and his deputy assistant secretary of the Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition -- i.e. Nuclear Waste "Nerd" in their words.

History-making nonbinary government official is out of a job after theft accusations

Or maybe Kerry who screwed up every State Department national security issue he touched, including getting Congress to sign off on an Iran nuclear deal that he said part of which must remain secret because they involve other governments.  That's not a real thing.  Congress has clearances for such information.

Bolton in his CNN interview also said Trump refused to follow deference in the nominations.  In simpler language, that means he didn't bow down to the nominee list the Swamp wanted him to pick from.

He's poking the hornet's nest for real, and he's only been President-elect for a little more than a week.  Wait until he gets sworn in, and there's no Russia-gate BS investigation impeding his actions!

 :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :geekdanc: :popcorn:

At least Gaetz doesn't wear a dress cause he's male.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #44 on: November 15, 2024, 04:27:39 PM »
At least Gaetz doesn't wear a dress cause he's male.

A woke government
is a broke government.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Jaco808

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #45 on: November 15, 2024, 06:46:25 PM »
Can you post what statements make her not fit?

Can you post what evidence there is to ties to dictators in Russia?  I thought Russia also has only 1 dictator which is the concept of what a dictator is. So no "s" in dictators.

This covers many of her statements

https://www.newsweek.com/what-tulsi-gabbard-has-said-about-russia-ukraine-china-1985839

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #46 on: November 15, 2024, 07:21:33 PM »
This covers many of her statements

https://www.newsweek.com/what-tulsi-gabbard-has-said-about-russia-ukraine-china-1985839

You posted a link to someone else's material and opinions.

Are you saying you have no opinion of your own, or that you have no material of your own to support your opinion? 

Linking to a Newsweek article is lazy and doesn't tell us what you think and how you preformed your analysis.

What i'm hearing is you just agree with anyone whose conclusions support your feelings.

Most of the article is nothing but spin -- saying what they say others have accused her of and her statements that "seemed to be" yada yada yada.

Go to other sources where they actually give the statements IN CONTEXT as well as her own explanation of what she meant.  Allowing detractors to tell you what she meant is why your opinions are so very wrong.

« Last Edit: November 15, 2024, 07:31:02 PM by Flapp_Jackson »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Jaco808

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #47 on: November 16, 2024, 08:13:18 AM »
You posted a link to someone else's material and opinions.

Are you saying you have no opinion of your own, or that you have no material of your own to support your opinion? 

Linking to a Newsweek article is lazy and doesn't tell us what you think and how you preformed your analysis.

What i'm hearing is you just agree with anyone whose conclusions support your feelings.

Most of the article is nothing but spin -- saying what they say others have accused her of and her statements that "seemed to be" yada yada yada.

Go to other sources where they actually give the statements IN CONTEXT as well as her own explanation of what she meant.  Allowing detractors to tell you what she meant is why your opinions are so very wrong.

The tweets speak for themselves.  That article is a summary. 

changemyoil66

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #48 on: November 16, 2024, 10:50:37 AM »
This covers many of her statements

https://www.newsweek.com/what-tulsi-gabbard-has-said-about-russia-ukraine-china-1985839
Nothing in the link supports ur statement. Try again.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #49 on: November 16, 2024, 11:48:40 AM »
The tweets speak for themselves.  That article is a summary.

The article is a hit piece.

But since you see it as a factual summary, you prove my earlier point:  you agree with anyone whose conclusions support your feelings.

The "summary" is taken 100% out of context, as are most of the Tweets.

Go to an interview where she was asked to expound upon her Tweets and remarks.  Get more than a lousy soundbite.

You sound like you're part of the problem:  too lazy to look beyond a soundbite or Twitter post.

Do some work of your own and stop relying on others to feed you actual facts and truths.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Jaco808

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #50 on: November 16, 2024, 02:28:59 PM »
The article is a hit piece.

But since you see it as a factual summary, you prove my earlier point:  you agree with anyone whose conclusions support your feelings.

The "summary" is taken 100% out of context, as are most of the Tweets.

Go to an interview where she was asked to expound upon her Tweets and remarks.  Get more than a lousy soundbite.

You sound like you're part of the problem:  too lazy to look beyond a soundbite or Twitter post.

Do some work of your own and stop relying on others to feed you actual facts and truths.

So are you against Japan re-arming?

Ukraine has bio labs?

And all her other tweets you support?

You are what's wrong with the world, clearly we can't have a conversation.  Your facts are only what you want them to be.  Arguing about anything but the truth.  Does it really matter if I spent 30min gathering all her ridiculous tweets or posting a site that did it for me.   Work smart not hard.   

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #51 on: November 16, 2024, 02:38:48 PM »
So are you against Japan re-arming?

Ukraine has bio labs?

And all her other tweets you support?

You are what's wrong with the world, clearly we can't have a conversation.  Your facts are only what you want them to be.  Arguing about anything but the truth.  Does it really matter if I spent 30min gathering all her ridiculous tweets or posting a site that did it for me.   Work smart not hard.

If we can't have a conversation, it's because you can't support your beliefs.  I have no problem with a conversation, but when you start flinging your poo and knocking the chess board over, the game is pointless.

Quote
Since 2005, the U.S. has partnered with Ukraine through the Pentagon’s
Biological Threat Reduction Program. The purpose is "to support peaceful
and safe biological detection and diagnostic capabilities and to reduce the
threats posed by pathogens," according to a March 2022 government fact
sheet.
Quote
The Pentagon hasn’t said anything new about the 46 facilities — we reported
about them in April. In fact, the June 9 release at the center of these claims
specifically states that Ukraine "has no nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons
programs."

With regard to the 46 facilities, the government fact sheet said the U.S. has:
"Worked collaboratively to improve Ukraine’s biological safety, security,
and disease surveillance for both human and animal health, providing
support to 46 peaceful Ukrainian laboratories
, health facilities, and
disease diagnostic sites over the last two decades. The collaborative
programs have focused on improving public health and agricultural safety
measures at the nexus of nonproliferation."

Quote
While the U.S. is providing support for Ukraine, the labs are owned and
operated by the Ukrainian government, Robert Pope, director of the
Cooperative Threat Reduction Department, previously told PolitiFact.

"Specifically, we make the labs more secure from accidental or intentional
release, provide diagnostic equipment, train personnel on the use of the
equipment, and train them how to detect potential outbreaks," Pope said.
"DTRA not only does this with Ukraine, but also with partners in over 30
countries, at their request, to assist with safe disease detection and diagnosis."
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jun/15/blog-posting/pentagon-didnt-admit-there-are-46-us-funded-biolab/

So, YES, Ukraine has a lot of Biolabs.  Nobody said they are producing bioweapons.  But they are working on countermeasures for them.  How do they develop countermeasures without having samples of the bioweapons onsite?  Obviously, they can't. 

And since Ukraine, not the US, owns those labs, how can we really know whether we are also funding developmental research as well?

Why would the US "make the labs more secure from accidental or intentional release, provide diagnostic equipment, train personnel on the use of the equipment, and train them how to detect potential outbreaks," if there are no bioweapons on site?  We wouldn't.

So, instead of discussing her actual comments, you try to turn it around on me with questions on MY opinions and issue positions?

Hate to disappoint you, butt I'm not the one Trump asked to join his cabinet.

It matters that you actually know what you're complaining about and not hiding behind what someone who published a Newsweek article told you about her.

The facts are out there.  Do the work.

if you still think Trump said Nazis and White Supremacists were 'very fine people," as your daddy, Biden, and mama, Kamala, continue to repeat, you're never going to see the truth.  Until you admit you've been feeding on an endless stream of lies, you're going to remain the problem.
« Last Edit: November 16, 2024, 02:57:38 PM by Flapp_Jackson »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

macsak

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #52 on: November 16, 2024, 02:44:13 PM »
prove ukraine has no biolabs...

So are you against Japan re-arming?

Ukraine has bio labs?

And all her other tweets you support?

You are what's wrong with the world, clearly we can't have a conversation.  Your facts are only what you want them to be.  Arguing about anything but the truth.  Does it really matter if I spent 30min gathering all her ridiculous tweets or posting a site that did it for me.   Work smart not hard.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #53 on: November 16, 2024, 03:00:50 PM »
prove ukraine has no biolabs...

They have 46 bio labs according to the Pentagon which we have been funding.

Those are the ones we know of, and we have no actual authority to ensure they are not developing biological weapons.
 Ukraine owns the labs.

Whether or not they are doing that is irrelevant to the point -- the labs do exist, and we made them possible.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #54 on: November 16, 2024, 03:06:56 PM »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #55 on: November 16, 2024, 03:15:27 PM »
Listen to what she says, not to what her opponents say about her.


The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

ren

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #56 on: November 16, 2024, 03:23:00 PM »
nobody is proclaiming: First Woman of Color!?
Deeds Not Words

changemyoil66

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #57 on: November 16, 2024, 03:48:43 PM »
Shes more indian than Hyena since shes Hindu.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

changemyoil66

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #58 on: November 16, 2024, 03:50:59 PM »
So are you against Japan re-arming?

Ukraine has bio labs?

And all her other tweets you support?

You are what's wrong with the world, clearly we can't have a conversation.  Your facts are only what you want them to be.  Arguing about anything but the truth.  Does it really matter if I spent 30min gathering all her ridiculous tweets or posting a site that did it for me.   Work smart not hard.
FYI japan has a defense force. Google how it differs from our military force.

Then see if Japan re-arming goes with what Japan is.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

QUIETShooter

Re: Trump Nominations
« Reply #59 on: November 16, 2024, 04:06:19 PM »
So are you against Japan re-arming?

Ukraine has bio labs?

And all her other tweets you support?

You are what's wrong with the world, clearly we can't have a conversation.  Your facts are only what you want them to be.  Arguing about anything but the truth.  Does it really matter if I spent 30min gathering all her ridiculous tweets or posting a site that did it for me.   Work smart not hard

30 minutes.  Ooooh.  Not sure about working smart but you certainly didn't work hard.


Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.