The Supreme Court on Thursday weighed whether to allow
President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship
to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they
might ultimately be found to violate the Constitution.

The justices heard arguments in the Trump administration’s
emergency appeals over lower court orders that have kept the
citizenship restrictions on hold across the country. Nationwide,
or universal, injunctions have emerged as an important check
on Trump’s efforts to remake the government and a mounting
frustration to the Republican president and his allies.

Judges have issued 40 nationwide injunctions since Trump began
his second term in January, Solicitor General D. John Sauer told
the court at the start of more than two hours of arguments.

Birthright citizenship is among several issues, many related to
immigration, that the administration has asked the court to address
on an emergency basis, after lower courts acted to slow the
president’s agenda.

We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds
with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the
Constitution itself.

We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive
while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”

U.S. Senator John Kennedy, R-La., praised the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling
that blocks nationwide injunctions, potentially paving the way for President
Donald Trump‘s plans to eliminate birthright citizenship and other executive policies.

The 73-year-old lawmaker said he was “proud” of the 6-3 decision from the
conservative majority of the court, which limited lower courts to injunctions for
any said policy only in a plaintiff’s jurisdiction.

“The Supreme Court has turned the universal injunctions into fish food, as well it
should have,” Kennedy told Fox News’ Harris Faulkner. “There’s no basis in statute.
There’s no basis in Supreme Court precedent. There is no basis in English common
law for universal injunctions.”

He added, “Judges who just dislike what Congress and a president, any president,
has done, just made them up. And good riddance.”

Kennedy then called out Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who decried the majority’s
ruling in a fiery dissent.

In the ruling, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is ‘mad as a bag of cats’
over SCOTUS ruling says Republican senator: ‘That’s a good thing’

https://youtu.be/ZxW1OXYTrEM?si=-VFQczlPKsTd0pUI

biden's kiss a$$.

Ketanji Brown Jackson is a woman, and she must hear cases that deal with gender discrimination issues.  Yet, she can't define what a woman is?

That woke piece of garbage should have never been confirmed based on this one question alone.

Sen. Blackburn asks Supreme Court nominee to define 'woman' | USA TODAY

DEI hire level 9999

She was confirmed June 30, 2022.  I'm wondering whether that's one more Biden decision that could be reversed because of his dementia? 

There needs to be a resolution to the Biden era mental incompetence and when his ability to know what he was doing ceased to exist.  The longer that takes, the less chance we have to correct some of his worst decisions before they become OBE (Obsolete by Events).