BREAKING: I.C.E. Drops SIG P320 & Immediately Awards Glock New Duty Pistol (Read 2339 times)

macsak

Xavierbaker

Can we make 2011’s standard duty pistol instead?

Flapp_Jackson

Can we make 2011’s standard duty pistol instead?
It has only been 10 years since HPD switched to Glock 17's.  Maybe they can switch back?

The gun's age doesn't even matter as much as how much use they have seen.  Even if wear and tear becomes an issue, replacement parts like barrels and slides are cheaper than a new gun.  Plus, they always have NIB spares they can use to replace well-worn pistols.

I'm starting to wonder about the justification for a replacement program and going to a different brand.  It seems like accessories, holsters, etc., would be less expensive if we just replaced the current G17's with new g17's.

The prior service weapon, a S&W 9mm, was procured and issued in 1990.  They remained the issue sidearm until 2015.  25 years of service seems like a better return on investment than 10 years.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

hvybarrels

That’s a lot of used p320s about to flood the market.

Might be worth looking for deals and getting the voluntary upgrade

Gunsmiths say the issue still happens after the upgrade. Still might be worth the gamble if someone figures out a solution or sig eventually offers an enticing trade in program.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2025, 12:29:00 PM by hvybarrels »
The F in Communism stands for Food

zippz


I'm starting to wonder about the justification for a replacement program and going to a different brand.  It seems like accessories, holsters, etc., would be less expensive if we just replaced the current G17's with new g17's.


The pistol and replacement gear are small costs.  The pistol has to be tested and evaluated, gunsmiths and instructors trained, and officers have a week of transition training on the firearm.  That equals to about $3k to $4k per officer.  It also means less officer coverage and other tasks not done during that time

Flapp_Jackson

The pistol and replacement gear are small costs.  The pistol has to be tested and evaluated, gunsmiths and instructors trained, and officers have a week of transition training on the firearm.  That equals to about $3k to $4k per officer.  It also means less officer coverage and other tasks not done during that time

Thanks for elaborating on my 'etc.'.    :geekdanc: :shaka:
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

QUIETShooter

Solution for the P320:

Israeli carry.

Sometimes you gotta know when to save your bullets.

changemyoil66

It has only been 10 years since HPD switched to Glock 17's.  Maybe they can switch back?

The gun's age doesn't even matter as much as how much use they have seen.  Even if wear and tear becomes an issue, replacement parts like barrels and slides are cheaper than a new gun.  Plus, they always have NIB spares they can use to replace well-worn pistols.

I'm starting to wonder about the justification for a replacement program and going to a different brand.  It seems like accessories, holsters, etc., would be less expensive if we just replaced the current G17's with new g17's.

The prior service weapon, a S&W 9mm, was procured and issued in 1990.  They remained the issue sidearm until 2015.  25 years of service seems like a better return on investment than 10 years.

I remember HPD"s statement on the 5906 is that spare parts are no longer made. 

Flapp_Jackson

I remember HPD"s statement on the 5906 is that spare parts are no longer made.

Maybe the Glock doesn't shoot as well as the SIG (my opinion as well), so they wanted to jump on the P320 bandwagon along with the military and other LE agencies?

When they switched to Glock, the news stated the city "replaced them [S&W] with lighter and easier-to-use Glock 17s that cost about half as much as the Smith & Wessons."

Apparently they were looking at ease of use when they chose the Glock, but that's subjective.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

hvybarrels

Solution for the P320:

Israeli carry.

If you can pick up brand new or gently used one in the hundred dollar range that would be worth the extra bit of training
The F in Communism stands for Food

eyeeatingfish

Can we make 2011’s standard duty pistol instead?

That would double or triple the cost based on most 2011's I saw

ren

That would double or triple the cost based on most 2011's I saw

Which 2011s? How much did SIG charge the govt. on that contract?
Deeds Not Words

eyeeatingfish

Which 2011s? How much did SIG charge the govt. on that contract?

Saw a number of brands near $1000 and up from there. Are there any good 2011s available for $500-600 of a glock?

ren

Saw a number of brands near $1000 and up from there. Are there any good 2011s available for $500-600 of a glock?

Which brands? and how do you know it would up the cost 2x or 3x without knowing what the govt. paid?
Deeds Not Words

hvybarrels

Apparently the govt paid $178 each for the p320s.

That might be the problem right there.
The F in Communism stands for Food

Flapp_Jackson

Apparently the govt paid $178 each for the p320s.

That might be the problem right there.
Yep. 
Too late to start selling P320 holsters made of Kevlar?

 :geekdanc:

Why the Army LOVES Sig Sauer and DENIED Glock

Quote
The defining feature of the competition was modularity. The Army wanted a
handgun system that could adapt to various roles, transitioning seamlessly
between full-size, compact, and subcompact configurations. This wasn’t just
a bonus – it was a fundamental requirement. Sig Sauer’s P320 excelled here,
offering a removable trigger package that could be swapped between different
frames and slides. In contrast, Glock’s 19X struggled to meet this standard.
https://www.survivalworld.com/military/why-the-army-loves-sig-sauer-and-denied-glock/

Starting to look more like a case of Procurement Requirements drafted to favor a particular vendor's submission.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Which brands? and how do you know it would up the cost 2x or 3x without knowing what the govt. paid?

I am comparing MSRPs. Of course the government would get a bulk discount but that would hold true for a glock as well.

Are you aware of any 2011 brands cheap enough that they could bulk price anywhere near the bulk price of a glock?

ren

I am comparing MSRPs. Of course the government would get a bulk discount but that would hold true for a glock as well.

Are you aware of any 2011 brands cheap enough that they could bulk price anywhere near the bulk price of a glock?

You said you saw "brands" which ones?
Deeds Not Words

eyeeatingfish

You said you saw "brands" which ones?

Stocatto, Taryn Tactical, Wilson Combat, Springfield.

ren

Stocatto, Taryn Tactical, Wilson Combat, Springfield.

Taryn Tactical, Wilson Combat, Springfield don't make "2011s"
Deeds Not Words