Why hasn’t Antifa been declared a terrorist organization yet?

Are we giving them a couple weeks to destroy evidence first?

Could it be there is a data trail that connects them with a certain pariah state that specializes in assassinations?

On January 9, 2025, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced
House Resolution 26 (H.Res. 26), seeking to designate Antifa and its
affiliates as a domestic terrorist organization under section 2331 of title 18,
United States Code. The resolution points to a series of violent incidents
linked to Antifa-affiliated individuals and demonstrations, arguing that such
conduct constitutes domestic terrorism. Proponents view the resolution as
a step toward combating political violence, while critics raise significant
concerns about enforceability, civil liberties, and the potential for government
overreach.

Is it getting held up in committee by all the Republicans that voted to seal the Epstein files last week?

This one revives that Resolution in Jan this year, but seems to have even less support, likely because ANTIFA hasn't been as active as they were before Trump's first term.

How is doxing and attacking ICE agents not considered active?

Apparently House Republicans are more than happy to allow Democrat goon squads to run rampant for some reason.

If I was a federal agent dealing with the same monsters over and over again I would be furious.

With the addition of these four individuals, the number of federal defendants
charged in Portland in connection to protests and attacks at the ICE facility
since June 13, 2025, now stands at 22.

Clearly a significant faction Democrats within our government finds them useful, otherwise they would not be allowed to exist.
The feds could roll them up in an afternoon. If they don’t do it soon then someone on the freshly radicalized right is going to step up and do it for them.

Separately, looks like firing squad really IS a possibility if found guilty in Utah;

“Bondi said she expects prosecutors to seek the death penalty, which she described as “very real in Utah,” noting that the state is allowed to use firing squads to carry out executions.”

That’d be a super sweet bookend just for all the demonic slime celebrating the shooting of Charlie Kirk by this satanic POS!

Utah law stopped allowing a sentence of death by firing squad in 2004.  Anyone sentenced before 2004 and who opted for a firing squad is still able to have that option.  All death sentences after 2004 must be by lethal injection.

Exception:  If within 30 days of the execution date the state is unable to obtain the necessary chemicals to properly perform a lethal injection, then a firing squad will be the fallback method.

A ffiring squad won't apply to the Charlie Kirk shooter unless that exception kicks in.

The average time an inmate now spends on Utah’s death row is nearly 34 years,
a sign of how drawn-out and complex the process has become.
https://kutv.com/news/2news-investigates/utah-moving-away-from-capital-punishment-with-fewer-sentences-executions

Charlie was converting to Catholicism so he likely would have been against the death penalty.

Late Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk advocated for the death penalty
on several occasions, arguing it should apply broadly in murder cases rather
than only in the most extreme circumstances.
   :   :
   :   :
Earlier this year, Kirk discussed his stance on capital punishment during an
exchange with a student captured in a video posted to Turning Point USA’s
YouTube channel. Kirk was asked about how he could support a "limited
government" while also believing it should have the power to execute people.

"I believe in a small but strong government and, for the record, I believe
that someone who took a life should have their life taken," Kirk told the student.

"Under every circumstance?" the student asks Kirk.

"Under most, yeah," Kirk responds.

The student countered that the death penalty should be reserved for extreme
instances, such as school shootings, mass murders and crimes against humanity,
but not for what she described as "eye-for-an-eye nonsense."

Charlie Kirk’s strong stance on death penalty
resurfaces after Utah assassination

He’s a patsy. You’re watching a scripted tv program designed to squeeze your adrenals into doing something stupid.

Utah law stopped allowing a sentence of death by firing squad in 2004.  Anyone sentenced before 2004 and who opted for a firing squad is still able to have that option.  All death sentences after 2004 must be by lethal injection.

Exception:  If within 30 days of the execution date the state is unable to obtain the necessary chemicals to properly perform a lethal injection, then a firing squad will be the fallback method.

A ffiring squad won't apply to the Charlie Kirk shooter unless that exception kicks in.

The average time an inmate now spends on Utah’s death row is nearly 34 years,
a sign of how drawn-out and complex the process has become.
https://kutv.com/news/2news-investigates/utah-moving-away-from-capital-punishment-with-fewer-sentences-executions

If lethal injection is the only form of capital punishment I'd rather these monsters get thrown in prison for life with no parole with an anal rapist as a roommate and the key thrown away.

"Earlier this year..."

It should be obvious to everyone by now that his stances had changed on a great number of topics in the past six months, and Catholic doctrine is against the death penalty as long as long term confinement is feasable and the community can be kept safe.

They believe every soul deserves the possibility of redemption.