100% true but it is also hillarious that those who complained the loudest about the weaponization of the government under Biden and Obama are now silent when Trump is doing it.


Trump would be there on the gallows with the rest of them.

They literally had to change the statute of limitations to go after Trump with the E. Jean Kelly thing, and the real estate stuff wasn’t even a crime.

If anything the lawfare against Trump proved how clean he is and how dirty the system has become.

They literally had to change the statute of limitations to go after Trump with the E. Jean Kelly thing, and the real estate stuff wasn’t even a crime.

If anything the lawfare against Trump proved how clean he is and how dirty the system has become.

EEF doesn't believe Trump is clean.  His TDS prevents him believing in anything other than the accusations he gets from the Liberal websites he goes on.

That much is obvious given his constant attempts to start arguments over Trump and his administration.

Is Trump perfect?  Nobody is.  He is, however, the only thing standing between freedom and the radical Left's view of a Socialist totalitarian utopia.

If you believe in Socialism, then by definition you don't believe in individual liberty.

they changed the charges to get around statute of limitations on the real estate thing too

They literally had to change the statute of limitations to go after Trump with the E. Jean Kelly thing, and the real estate stuff wasn’t even a crime.

If anything the lawfare against Trump proved how clean he is and how dirty the system has become.

they changed the charges to get around statute of limitations on the real estate thing too

Don't forget he was never found guilty of any underlying crime to create the felonies they charged him with.

It's called bootstrapping.  They pretended they found him guilty of the underlying crime in order to get felony charges in hopes that would turn up an underlying crime conviction.

Lawfare.

And they impeached him for the Russia thing that was false to being with and Ukraine. Oh wait, we covered all of this already. 

Interesting how facts didn't change. When one goes by facts/logic, things don't change.

They literally had to change the statute of limitations to go after Trump with the E. Jean Kelly thing, and the real estate stuff wasn’t even a crime.

If anything the lawfare against Trump proved how clean he is and how dirty the system has become.

I totally agree with you on the first sentence.
The second one is a non-sequitur. What he did was improper even if it didn't amount to a crime. The fact that the DOJ is charging Letitia James for essentially the same type of crime also undercuts the argument that what Trump did was perfectly fine. All the same arguments made about this being lawfare against Trump also work in defense of Letitia James. You also picked the weakest criminal case against Trump, the one that was most egregiously lawfare.

Not everything Trump is doing is necessarily illegal so framing it as being illegal or not is not the right way to approach. President's have flexed their power and increased it many times throughout the history, sometimes when they knew it was unconstitutional despite it not being a crime. Biden's student loan forgiveness was an example.

Understand that my point is not to say there wasn't lawfare against Trump, there absolutely was, but that Trump is engaging in the same type of behavior. Trump didn't drain any swamps, he just put in his own alligators.

EEF doesn't believe Trump is clean.  His TDS prevents him believing in anything other than the accusations he gets from the Liberal websites he goes on.

That much is obvious given his constant attempts to start arguments over Trump and his administration.

Is Trump perfect?  Nobody is.  He is, however, the only thing standing between freedom and the radical Left's view of a Socialist totalitarian utopia.

If you believe in Socialism, then by definition you don't believe in individual liberty.

Someone drank the kool-aid.

Obtuse doesn't begin to cover this BS.

I already explained how they violated the FCC rules.  If you want a job as an FCC enforcer, maybe do more in the way of education than 3 minutes on Google.

Go back and read my earlier posts.  You obiously can't seem to remember what you read.

Re-reading your incorrect justifications wouldn't benefit me. I'll take official FCC explanations of rules and Ted Cruz' constitutional credentials over your biased interpretation.

I totally agree with you on the first sentence.
The second one is a non-sequitur. What he did was improper even if it didn't amount to a crime. The fact that the DOJ is charging Letitia James for essentially the same type of crime also undercuts the argument that what Trump did was perfectly fine. All the same arguments made about this being lawfare against Trump also work in defense of Letitia James. You also picked the weakest criminal case against Trump, the one that was most egregiously lawfare.

Not everything Trump is doing is necessarily illegal so framing it as being illegal or not is not the right way to approach. President's have flexed their power and increased it many times throughout the history, sometimes when they knew it was unconstitutional despite it not being a crime. Biden's student loan forgiveness was an example.

Understand that my point is not to say there wasn't lawfare against Trump, there absolutely was, but that Trump is engaging in the same type of behavior. Trump didn't drain any swamps, he just put in his own alligators.

Living within the boundaries set by in the law doesn't mean you're clean?

What other standard are you expecting us to live by?  You expect him to be perfect -- a standard nobody alive can meet.

Based on your comment, you believe what Trump is doing is the same as the lawfare done to Trump only because it involves those people who targeted Trump politically?

I believe that's called transference.  You think because Trump was unfairly dragged into court over purely political motives that now Trump's motives are also political -- even though when he does it he follows the law. 

You remind me of the kid who tells the teacher I hit you on the playground after you hit me almost daily until I stood up for myself. 

Democrats mastered this move when they refused to live by any religious moral standards, but then called for the resignation of any Conservatives caught doing the same, such as extramarital affairs or having a homosexual partner.  Rules for thee, but not for me.

Hunter Biden was proven to have broken several laws, but daddy's staff pardoned him as well as his whole family preemptively.  Did that make them all "clean?"

Maybe Trump can do the same for his family and friends since there's a recent precedence?  Although, a recent report says all those Biden executive actions, including the pardons, are null and void.   

You should seek professional help.  You have a brain leak somewhere.

Re-reading your incorrect justifications wouldn't benefit me. I'll take official FCC explanations of rules and Ted Cruz' constitutional credentials over your biased interpretation.

What I posted IS the official FCC explanations of rules.

If you read it, you'd know.

Someone drank the kool-aid.

That's your educated response?

TDS is directly tied to a cult.  Euphemisms about flavored water aren't necessary.

That's your educated response?

TDS is directly tied to a cult.  Euphemisms about flavored water aren't necessary.

TDS tied to a cult? Sure. So is MAGA and this worship of Trump.

Living within the boundaries set by in the law doesn't mean you're clean?

What other standard are you expecting us to live by?  You expect him to be perfect -- a standard nobody alive can meet.

Based on your comment, you believe what Trump is doing is the same as the lawfare done to Trump only because it involves those people who targeted Trump politically?

I believe that's called transference.  You think because Trump was unfairly dragged into court over purely political motives that now Trump's motives are also political -- even though when he does it he follows the law. 

You remind me of the kid who tells the teacher I hit you on the playground after you hit me almost daily until I stood up for myself. 

Democrats mastered this move when they refused to live by any religious moral standards, but then called for the resignation of any Conservatives caught doing the same, such as extramarital affairs or having a homosexual partner.  Rules for thee, but not for me.

Hunter Biden was proven to have broken several laws, but daddy's staff pardoned him as well as his whole family preemptively.  Did that make them all "clean?"

Maybe Trump can do the same for his family and friends since there's a recent precedence?  Although, a recent report says all those Biden executive actions, including the pardons, are null and void.   

You should seek professional help.  You have a brain leak somewhere.

Expect Trump to be perfect? Of course not, but not sure why the unattainability of perfection justifies his terrible behavior.

My position is that it is either lawfare or it is following the law. You can't have two identical cases and claim it lawfare when it is done to you and implementing justice when you are the one doing it. If it was wrong to do to Trump it is wrong for Trump to do it back. If it is right to do it to Letitia James then it was right to do to Trump. Have some integrity, pick one or the other and stick with it.

Everything else in your statement is whataboutism.