What do you think? Am I on point here?
Unbelievable what's going on out there on the internet.
After all the Cop body cam videos i've watched the last few weeks, I have to say there are people in the country who thInk they know their rights and are willing to fight Cops to get their way.
This is being taught in schools. Kids get out of class to go to protests for Liberal causes. The same is not true for Conservative causes.
ANTIFA was hatched on college campuses using kids who were happily living off their parents or student loans. Once the reality of making their own money slapped them in the collective face, they began looking for some way to live under the lies they were fed. Paid protestor? Why not?
History shows that there's a formula for starting a civil war, and that civil war is how people fundamentally change their country.
Those are the words Obama used:.
Here’s Obama’s original statement, in an October 2008 campaign visit to Columbia, Mo:
"Now, Mizzou, I just have two words for you tonight: five days. Five days.
After decades of broken politics in Washington, and eight years of failed
policies from George W. Bush, and 21 months of a campaign that's taken
us from the rocky coast of Maine to the sunshine of California, we are five
days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America."
You don't seek to fundamentally transform a nation unless you first destroy that nation. Unless people are totally pissed at their lives, they have no reason to want to see significant changes to the foundation of the nation.
If you can convince 500 million people that a senile man is a better choice than a lifelong successful businessman, then you can also convince them that the only way to obtain the changes needed to make the country better is to eliminate the opposition.
Our US Civil War would not have happened if the Federal Government had allowed the states the option of seceding from the union and forming their own collection of states. One could argue that one decision not only caused that civil war, but the current situation might have been the result of that war and the cause of the next one.
imagine if half the nation lived on one side of the continent, and the other half lived on the other side. Each can have their own constitution. No guns allowed on the Left Coast, but gun rights protected on the Right Coast. An illegal alien sanctuary on the Left, and secured borders on the Right. Transgender affirming care paid for by the state on the Left, but not on the Right. Trans athletes can compete in women's sports on the Left, but not on the Right.
Make a list of every issues the Left champions, and they would have the power to make those things reality. On the Right, they would also have the power to govern as the majority sees fit.
If someone on the Right wanted to switch sides, they would be welcomed across the Left's open borders. Entry into the Right side would be strictly controlled and visas enforced.
So, yeah. Having already divided the nation instead of having a war might have worked better in the long term. Slavery would have died long ago regardless, because it's really not needed to make a profit and most Western nations abolished it without a war.
Great thought experiment. Which side will have been more prosperous? Would there be a 2 party system on the Left, or more like Socialism? Would the right have any Liberals living there and running for office, or would the Right expect them to immigrate to the Left? Would we be able to stop the infiltration of Leftism into the Right side, or is it inevitable? Will we make better laws that protect our values, or keep making the same mistakes that brought us here?
It almost reminds me of East and West Berlin. The Socialist side failed (East), in case you need to be reminded.
A wall had to be built and guarded to stop people from fleeing East Berlin. Imagine that.
