So basically you made up your mind, no interest in the truth.


You know this because of your years of experience in law enforcement? You know this to be true despite it being common practice for the feds to take years to build their cases?



Give him the benefit of the doubt then, but why not investigate further? Unless of course you don't care about the truth...

You posted nothing of substance as usual. My post you replied to answers all your questions with logic used.

funny how you call someone out about not being in law enforcement, but won't admit that you are law enforcement...

I'll address this since I didn't in my other reply to EEF. I am not law enforcement. Wow, that's easy to admit.

Lots of assumptions about a media known as the fake news.

The main stream corporate media lost all credibility long, long ago.  The destruction was complete during Trump's first campaign & term with the Russia-Collusion Hoax, the secret meeting on the tarmac between Slick Willy and the USAG, and the constant attacks on what Trump said and not what he was doing that was positive.

Excuse me if i treat the press as liars no matter what they say.

As Judge Marilyn Milian on The People's Court used to like saying, "I wouldn't trust what you say even if your tongue came notarized!"

It all falls under the "Fool me once..." doctrine.

The main stream corporate media lost all credibility long, long ago. 

People who use logic understand this.  But there are millions who don't and they still believe them.

People who use logic understand this.  But there are millions who don't and they still believe them.

They’re pounding Tylenol right now and showing up in the hospitals with liver failure.

As their reality continues collapsing they will doubtless reach for something stronger.

When English accepted the bribe he was immediately arrested.WHy wasn't Homan?
I'll let our local LEO/SME/OP opine on this.

https://www.news10.com/news/politics/prosecutors-2-hawaii-lawmakers-took-bribes-to-steer-bills/

When English accepted the bribe he was immediately arrested.WHy wasn't Homan?
I'll let our local LEO/SME opine on this.

https://www.news10.com/news/politics/prosecutors-2-hawaii-lawmakers-took-bribes-to-steer-bills/

Your answer will be either really short, or really, really,
l
o
n
g
.
.
.

You posted nothing of substance as usual. My post you replied to answers all your questions with logic used.

1 part irony and 1 part falsehood 

Quote from: Kalihi Uka on September 24, 2025, 07:27:16 AM
All just allegations from unnamed sources.
*************************************************

Ok, well this is for you Mr. Fish:  FBI had 274 undercover agents on J6, and this is the upshot of the after action report.  Filthy agency under Biden & Wray - this is why minds are rather reasonably closed to accepting what they said at face value.  Just drop this facade that the agency was not run as the federal LE of The Party^TM

“The FBI secretly deployed more than 250 plainclothes agents to the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot, an operation so disorganized it unleashed searing frustrations among many of the FBI's rank-and-file that the bureau had lost its core competencies to "wokeness" and allowed its employees to become “pawns in a political war,” according to an after-action report kept from the public for more than four years.”

https://justthenews.com/accountability/fbi-bombshell-274-agents-sent-capitol-j6-many-later-complained-they-were-political?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost

The FBI having undercover agents on Jan 6 is not significant. Law enforcement agencies routinely send in plain clothes officers to monitor large protest crowds from the inside. This fact alone is not evidence of any type of nefarious action.

Having said that, law enforcement is open to bad actors and corrupt actors like any agency. Bad actions do fairly invite suspicion upon an agency but do not mean all the officers are bad. We can't just point at Comey or undercover officers in Jan 6 and dismiss the allegations of this investigation when politically convenient. Does a bad employee at your work make you do bad work too? Of course not therefore I would look at this investigation relatively independently of the other wrongdoings by the FBI if they were different officers under different supervision.

In the end it is possible that there isn't enough evidence for a criminal case, maybe the officers failed to establish a specific enough quid pro quo for the money that was handed over for example. But why not investigate further? If there really is a video of undercover agents handing Homan $50,000 grand that isn't something to just be swept under the rug even if Homan is doing a great job.

Trump doesn't drain swamps, he just makes it his own swamp with his own alligators. We must dispel with this notion that he is eliminating corruption, Trump is human and just as susceptible to the corrupting strength of such power. We must guard against such corruption with political blinders on.

When English accepted the bribe he was immediately arrested.WHy wasn't Homan?
I'll let our local LEO/SME/OP opine on this.

https://www.news10.com/news/politics/prosecutors-2-hawaii-lawmakers-took-bribes-to-steer-bills/

Depends on the details of the investigation.
Cops don't always arrest drug dealers the first time they buy drugs from them. It all depends the scope of the investigation.

Rasmussen. And this was last year.

https://mustreadalaska.com/poll-28-of-democrats-say-america-would-have-been-better-off-if-trump-had-been-assassinated/

That figure includes 28% of Democrats who say that America would have been better off if Trump had been assassinated. Another 24% of Democrats were not sure. Fewer than half (48%) of Democrats could bring themselves to say that America would not be better off if the opposing party’s candidate for president had been assassinated.

So no. Don’t care.

I was promised authoritarianism. Let’s a get this show on the road.

A purge of woke military brass is a great place to start.

https://news-pravda.com/world/2025/09/26/1719994.html

Thanks for that poll info but you are stretching it a bit. The poll is about a single specific assassination but your comment made a claim of democrat positions generally about assassinations. Furthermore, the poll question was about whether we would be better off without Trump, not whether they approved of Trump being assassinated.


The more scary number is the percentage of liberals (and conservatives) who think it is ok to use force to stop a speaker they don't like.

please show me where it was not looked into seriously...

Show me where it was.

Do you oppose having congress look into this?

you made the claim, you back it up...

Show me where it was.

Do you oppose having congress look into this?

why should congress look into this when the investigation was already dropped?

Show me where it was.

Do you oppose having congress look into this?

 I know I asked this before but if Homan accepted that money, why did the Trump administration deem that there is insufficient evidence of any wrongdoing?

I tried to find out this by myself but my google-fu is weak or close to non-existent.

I'm pretty disappointed in Homan if he did accept that money and the Trump administration covered for him.  I admired him as one of the very rare and few "untouchables".

I loved that movie.  Andy Garcia on the stairwell, pointing his revolver at the perp while securing  the baby carriage.  Eyes focused.  Unwavering.  Just waiting for the green light.

1 part irony and 1 part falsehood 

You're still wrong.

why should congress look into this when the investigation was already dropped?

So you are arguing that the FBI only ever investigates things without political pressure or bias?

I know I asked this before but if Homan accepted that money, why did the Trump administration deem that there is insufficient evidence of any wrongdoing?

I tried to find out this by myself but my google-fu is weak or close to non-existent.

I'm pretty disappointed in Homan if he did accept that money and the Trump administration covered for him.  I admired him as one of the very rare and few "untouchables".

I loved that movie.  Andy Garcia on the stairwell, pointing his revolver at the perp while securing  the baby carriage.  Eyes focused.  Unwavering.  Just waiting for the green light.

I haven't found any specific information to explain the reasoning. It is possible that whatever conversation was had did not contain the requisite quid pro quo to clearly show it was a bribe. So for example, if you got stopped by a cop for a speeding violation, you handed him your car wallet with the insurance, registration, etc. and inside was $200, the cop would have a hard time showing you were trying to bribe him. There would need to be some level of communication that established the money was in exchange for some type of favorable treatment. Absent this, a prosecution would have trouble.

I try to look at the case from both sides and see it from the angle that Homan was doing nothing wrong but the big question I can't answer is what possible justifiable reason would there for Homan to accept such a sum of money? I agree, Homan did seem like a principled, mission oriented, tough, no BS guy to get the job done. If Homan really didn't do anything wrong, then I think he should welcome a congressional investigation. That's what I would want if I were innocent, have congress look at it so they can publicly clear me without question of political favor.

please show me where i said that...

So you are arguing that the FBI only ever investigates things without political pressure or bias?

So you are arguing that the FBI only ever investigates things without political pressure or bias?

So you are arguing that the FBI never investigates things without political pressure or bias?