The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield (Read 5375 times)

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« on: October 18, 2010, 12:30:18 PM »
There is a new book out by C.J. Chivers titled The Gun. As part of the publicity for the book, he is getting out and making the rounds. He had an nice long interview on NPR all about the AK-47.

I'm a very big fan of the AK-47 for its simplicity and reliability. It may not be as accurate as many other battle rifles, but it does have its place.
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

b.delpilar

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2010, 09:59:21 PM »
2A - I have to agree with you WRT the AK-47.  I was not a big fan of it until I started taking some course to see how it can be used.  It's simple and tough.  I never had to baby it.  As far as accuracy, it is poor but I won my fair share of ACTs stages in Tucson with a Saiga that had a Tapco G2 Trigger and iron Sites.  Ak's are great.  I think every household should have one but I might be overstating that.  Perhaps it is the GLock of  all assault rifles.  Maybe....just my opinion.


 I wonder if NPR has a podcast of the interview?

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2010, 10:34:55 PM »
There is. Just follow the link or download the interview here.
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

Tom_G

Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2010, 07:58:02 AM »
I really wish I could get on the AK bandwagon.  Conceptually, I appreciate everything it has going for it.  I like the cartridge, the reliability, the simplicity.  However, as many variants as I have fired, I just do not care for shooting them.  All of the full stocks I've tried have been cheek biters.  I don't like folders because I can't get a good cheek weld.  And I'm just not crazy about a pistol grip. 

If someone were to make an AK in a Monte Carlo stock...
The difference between theory and reality is that, in theory, there is no difference between theory and reality.

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2010, 08:02:44 AM »
You mean like the Saiga?
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

Tom_G

Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2010, 12:28:20 PM »
Yeah, I keep looking at the Saiga, but it also has turn-offs.  Like not taking AK mags without modification and problems with the front sight being mis-mounted.  If I come across a Saiga carbine in 7.62x39 in a gun store, I'll almost certainly buy it.  Not willing to order one sight unseen, though... to many folks telling tales of woe.
The difference between theory and reality is that, in theory, there is no difference between theory and reality.

2aHawaii

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • Total likes: 67
  • Sheepdog
  • Referrals: 17
    • View Profile
    • 2aHawaii
Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2010, 01:07:04 PM »
I honestly haven't heard anything about the front sight problems or really any other problems. There is the problem with not taking AK mags and not being 922r compliant if you do mod it and stick in 30 rounders. I have a stock one that I plan on modifying it in the future. I think it is a great rifle at a great price. Picked it up from Young Guns a while back.
I am not a lawyer.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - United States Constitution Amendment 2 & Hawaii State Constitution Article 1 Section 17

Buying from Amazon? Click through here

tundah

Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2010, 07:13:25 PM »
Love the AKs, so many flavors to choose from, love everything about them. In fact, they're the only rifles I own.

octomon

Re: The AK-47: 'The Gun' That Changed The Battlefield
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2010, 09:39:27 PM »
I can't speak highly enough for the AK--there are so many myths and half-truths going around, probably due to quality variance and use and abuse. I've had 2 Saiga SGL10s modded by Chris Butler, and both consistently held 1.25" at 50yd with a Micro Aimpoint mounted on an Ultimak rail. In practice, for me the AK is a very efficient and confidence inspiring weapon for which adaptation comes quickly. Those with a tri folder, and a fixed plastic non-NATO stock.


OTOH with two months time off, I find myself having to initially search for a proper cheek weld. The AKs iron sights and the Micro Aimpoint/Ultimak set up, requires a tighter cheek weld compared to the AR. The AK with a forward mounted Aimpoint/Ultimak is definitely front heavy compared to an AR, but you get used to it. Same with the Ultimak--the forward mount becomes sweet with practice, and it opens up peripheral vision.


If it wasn't for my time and history with the AR, I would have adopted the AK. I have huge love for the AKs caliber, handling, and recoil impulse. No problem with fast doubles.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2010, 10:08:22 PM by octomon »