Knew it wasn't a matter of if; it was a matter of when the mental health aspect of all these new gun control laws would start snowballing.

http://www.infowars.com/new-york-police-confiscating-firearms-from-people-takin-anti-anxiety-medication/

sad sad day

It seems as if the government is using New York as the new testing grounds for there anti-gun laws to disarm US citizens....pretty scary $hit!! 

Maybe because the same meds that are prescribed for depression also treat anxiety.

BS all around

I take infowars with a grain of salt... just like the huffpost.

I take infowars with a grain of salt... just like the huffpost.

I agree.

I take infowars with a grain of salt... just like the huffpost.

Yeah but same story is covered by multiple news agencies all over the web. Infowars is just one of many news agencies. The story is legit.
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/04/new-york-gun-confiscation-underway/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ammoland+%28ammoland%29#axzz2Q2slHph0

Here is audio from the attorney representing some of the clients.
http://www.wben.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=6319907

The next stage is people not going to the doc for any kind of treatment.

Great going huh.

Alex Jones is hit and miss with me, but when he's right... it's downright scary.

Was in Ammoland.com also

http://www.ammoland.com/2013/04/new-york-gun-confiscation-underway/#axzz2Q3YFThGq

This will have very bad consequences.  People will inevitably stop seeking treatment for mental issues for fear of confiscations, the crazy shootings will increase, the gun bans will increase, all guns will be banned for the law abiding.  Thanks politicians for keeping the people 'safe' 

This will have very bad consequences.  People will inevitably stop seeking treatment for mental issues for fear of confiscations

+1

Sad but true!!

Ah, but it's not about keeping people safe. 

It's about converting people from citizens to subjects.

This issue started long ago.  When schools and parents started putting half the school's kids on ADHD meds, they never considered the long term implications.  These kids became 18-year-old graduates, and they needed jobs.  Many were denied employment in areas that could not accept the liability of hiring a person with (1) a mental problem (ADHD), and (2) a long standing prescription for a mind-altering chemical (Ridilin).  So, if you wanted to be a bus driver, security guard with a gun, or anything else that involves the safety of the public or customers & fellow employees, then having that ADHD treatment in your records eliminates you from the candidate pool for many positions.

.

Yeah but same story is covered by multiple news agencies all over the web. Infowars is just one of many news agencies. The story is legit.
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/04/new-york-gun-confiscation-underway/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ammoland+%28ammoland%29#axzz2Q2slHph0

Here is audio from the attorney representing some of the clients.
http://www.wben.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=6319907

linking to ammoland doesn't make this any more credible.

This still deserves some skepticism, imo.

Ah, but it's not about keeping people safe. 

It's about converting people from citizens to subjects.

We are about half way there . . .

linking to ammoland doesn't make this any more credible.

This still deserves some skepticism, imo.

I guess it could possibly be a fabricated story if you have a huge tin foil hat handy, but not likely. Consider the following would have had to been fabricated, not to mention multiple New York news and media outlets, among others decided to print a story that has no merit or credible references.

1) New York talk show host Tom Bauerle interviewed attorney Jim Tresmond for nearly eight minutes that was made public (link below). The attorney is representing two of the clients, and the attorney confirmed everything firsthand. Reposting audio interview with attorney: http://www.wben.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=6319907

2) The writer for Ammoland wrote in his article that he spoke directly with attorney Jim Tresmond, who confirmed everything firsthand.

Seems a little over the top to think that the interview with attorney Jim Tresmond of the Tresmond Law Firm in Hamburg never occurred or was fabricated IMO. I could only imagine his response/action of someone quoting lies about him and fabricating an entire interview with a fictional character. Just seems a little bit much to not be a valid story.

I'm merely suggesting that having two sources that are each infowar and what is essntially a blog isn't necessarily definitive proof of anything.  I'm not saying its total bunk, what I am saying is assuming its real, especially from sources like these, is a good way to get duped, possibly now, and possibly in the future.

For instance, I haven't been able to search it yet, but where is fox news on this?  This is easily something they would pick up for one of their programs.  The liberal media would no doubt point to this as successfully stopping a tragedy at some level; where are they?



I'm not even suggesting its fabricated, only that we're mising relevant info as a possibility.

I haven't heard the interview, but the articles feel like part of the story is missing.

Case in point:

 http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/04/robert-farago/housekeeping-keeping-our-powder-dry/#more-216941

It appears tresmond is supplying unofficial, unconfirmable info.

That is, yes, it could all be fabricated, and, at the very least, seems to be missing a bit of info, at least officially.