Yes it's your right damn it!  Join most of the rest of the country already.  I'm glad to finally hear a slight hope for actual good gun laws in Hawaii.

Legislative Session 2019 they fire back with another failed attempt at an assault weapons ban just to spite us all. LOL 

So whats next? Can I rock out w/ my Glock out? 

So whats next? Can I rock out w/ my Glock out? 

Definitely not.

How can I donate money to help with attorneys fees?

How can I donate money to help with attorneys fees?

Ill add you to our facebook activism group.

Ill add you to our facebook activism group.

Whats the page?

https://www.scribd.com/document/384590619/Young-Opinion#fullscreen&from_embed

I won

Yes you did! And so did the rest of us with your victory.

Copy of decision: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/12-17808.pdf

This is hiliarious, the panel called out hawaii's policy of being a concealed carry state, and denying all permit applications.


While the County’s police chief purportedly awaits an
“exceptional case” to grant a concealed carry license, section 134-9 is
effectively a ban on the concealed carry of firearms. As counsel for the
County openly admitted at oral argument, not a single concealed carry
license has ever been granted by the County. Nor have concealed carry
applicants in other counties fared much better: Hawaii counties appear
to have issued only four concealed carry licenses in the past eighteen
years.

...............
Thus, even if the State and County remain free to accommodate the right to bear arms with concealed carry
after Peruta II, an issue we do not decide, section 134-9 does not offer a
realistic opportunity for a concealed carry license

Wow....

Just read through the entire decision. I am truly amazed at the depth and breadth the court went to in reaching it's (rightful) decision. To quote portions and sections of the decision would require just posting the entire document. There are too many great reasonings to share individually. In reading the dissent, it is equally the opposite in shallowness. It is the judicial equivalent of toddler speak for "because I said so".

This is truly a landmark decision that will and should be a basis of decisions forward.  I would hope that the 9th en banc would agree not to hear hear it and the State would just let things go and move forward with removing onerous and burdensome regulations from the law.

To the plaintiffs and barristers I raise a glass for you today! Skol!

If you haven't read the entire decision, you should. The legalese is a pain, but once you get through it, you will love it.
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/07/24/12-17808.pdf

Mahalo to all that have gone before to make this possible

Fyi, Young initially filed the case and represented himself with little legal experience.  The gun organizations didnt want to help him.  That takes a lot of courage.

http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/07/24/breaking-news/9th-circuit-court-rules-2nd-amendment-allows-right-to-carry-guns-in-public/

anti-gun fanatics wringing their hands and bleating about their safety because potentially law abiding citizens will exercise their 2nd amendment rights.  its hilarious.

I read the brief but got bogged down in the language . Can someone give us a summary?

This reminds me of the wise words of democrat congressman John Conyers
“I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill’........... Wh...What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”

Whats the page?

Ill get you signed up at the next meeting.

I too would like to donate.

The Republicans have quietly been filling judge vacancies across the nation with conservatives and the 9th Circus is high on their radar because they are probably, if not, the most liberal court in the nation. They did suffer a setback last week when the White House withdrew the nomination of Ryan Bounds for the Ninth Circuit after realizing it did not have the necessary support in the Senate, but that vacancy will be filled with a Trumpster conservative judge. Hopefully a few more in the 9th Circuit will vacant and the Republicans on Trump's coattails can reshape the 9th, and then we'll have a fighting chance on future cases!

9th Circuit Court Makeup (Active Judges)

Nixon - 2
Carter - 4
Reagan - 3
Clinton - 16
Bush - 9
Obama - 7
Trump - 1

https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view_seniority_list.php?pk_id=0000000035

Wow!  Clinton appointed a bunch of judges (16!).  And there are some old judges.  One was appointed in 1971! Alfred Goodwin is 95 years old!  That's going to be a lot to change the tide. 

Good news.  It's either the 9th circuit accepts it and permits must be issued or they reject it and it goes to scotus. And there are already previous rulings that ruled permits must be issued, so we know what scotus will say. Itll take a bit more time, but looks good to go. Still keep your fingers crossed

The process for an en banc review....http://cloud.tapatalk.com/s/5b57f6908480f/Ninth-Circuit-En-Banc-Procedure-Flowchart.pdf.pdf

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

http://www.staradvertiser.com/2018/07/24/breaking-news/9th-circuit-court-rules-2nd-amendment-allows-right-to-carry-guns-in-public/

anti-gun fanatics wringing their hands and bleating about their safety because potentially law abiding citizens will exercise their 2nd amendment rights.  its hilarious.

Yes.  Watching the local evening news about this decision is fun stuff.