This is an interesting case. Where do we draw the line between speech and voter disenfranchisement.
Do you draw the line at the same spot that states red flag law is constitutional?
If you do, then of course the hearing is in Brooklyn with a TDS justice system, cause they need that in order to push this. Even though the crime wasn't committed in Brooklyn, but traveled via the internet to Brooklyn. I mean, might as well go to the UN cause the internet is world wide and someone must have seen the meme in Dubai.
Of course, this doesn't violate free speech because someone somewhere was harmed immediately.
Of course this has a credible witness because there it's OK to remain anonyms cause the witness may get harassed online. Guess this is the same level as ISIS witnesses who come forward about a terrorist plot.
Of course there's intent because memes are known to be very serious and 100% accurate as everyone should believe every meme they see, BRB, I saw a meme about hot MILFS who want me in a 1 mile radius. I'm gonna go look for these hot MILFS who want me.
Of course he's getting a fair trial because after 3 days and 2 hung jury's the judge told them to go back and think harder about their chocie. I mean, who wants to go home over a BS case.