He said at a Townhall meeting in Wahiawa that he told Logan to be aggressive with approving CCW's.  He also states that "we're following the Bruen ruling".

aggressive in approving or denying?

In my opinion, be aggressive as much as possible in delaying the approval process.

aggressive in approving or denying?

You really have to ask?

You really have to ask?

There's a chance. Very small but it is there.

aggressive in approving or denying?

For denying.  Basically, look for any reason and make the applicant jump thru hoops to prove they're OK to CCW. Even though, they already own guns.

The mayor just wants to make sure the mantra "When seconds count, HPD is just minutes, or maybe hours away......" will live on forever.

Does the Mayor have a security detail? Does he CCW? Lead by example. If Honolulu is so safe that he feels no one should be able to defend themselves he should heed to that as well.

he claimed to be "intimidated" by me, when he was in a room with 10-12 officers and his whole cabinet behind him
so i doubt he was carrying if he was scared of me when i'm less than half his size...

Does the Mayor have a security detail? Does he CCW? Lead by example. If Honolulu is so safe that he feels no one should be able to defend themselves he should heed to that as well.

he claimed to be "intimidated" by me, when he was in a room with 10-12 officers and his whole cabinet behind him
so i doubt he was carrying if he was scared of me when i'm less than half his size...

SFODD DDS have mad skills

But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you...

SFODD DDS have mad skills

But what I do have are a very particular set of skills, skills I have acquired over a very long career. Skills that make me a nightmare for people like you...

To gingavites.

Watch the video

https://www.youtube.com/live/W9isk7CACvg?t=6491

It's supposed to be the Government's burden to prove a person is disqualified from owning a firearm.

Mayor says public safety is #1.  Sounds like interest balancing.

Watch the video

https://www.youtube.com/live/W9isk7CACvg?t=6491

It's supposed to be the Government's burden to prove a person is disqualified from owning a firearm.

Mayor says public safety is #1.  Sounds like interest balancing.

Maybe I'm being too sensitive, but Rick sounds like a 100% no-question-about-it gun-hating Democrat who's using "Hawaiian Culture" (i.e Aloha Spirit) to justify ignoring the rights of individuals to provide for their own safety without depending on government.

I didn't grow up in Hawaii, so I guess I'm part of the gun culture in the US.  Rick seems to believe I should abandon MY culture and adopt HIS simply because he believes it increases safety.  What happens when someone born and raised in HI travels and/or moves to the mainland because they can't afford it here?  They will be ill prepared for self defense because the wonderful people running HI decided they don't need to be able to carry or use a firearm.  The Aloha Spirit won't protect them at all.  Not everyone has the option of living on these tiny islands in the middle of the Pacific from cradle to grave where Big Brother pretends to keep them safe.  Even while traveling out of state for work or pleasure, HI residents deserve the right to prepare for whatever potential threats they may encounter. 

Rick has a pretty narrow view of life, liberty and safety in general.

I submitted my application in the first week in January, with everything that was needed being the new year.  HPD officer that is conducting the CCW applications called me first week of March, and told me my background check was done and good.  He said the next step was to get signed off by the Chief of police  Its been almost 45 days since my background check was good, and still nothing. I just called HPD firearms division to follow up. Talk about a waste of 7 minutes, listening to long winded prompts only to be told sit and wait from the automated voice.  This tyrant police chief is a joke, just like the politicians over here.

I submitted my application in the first week in January, with everything that was needed being the new year.  HPD officer that is conducting the CCW applications called me first week of March, and told me my background check was done and good.  He said the next step was to get signed off by the Chief of police  Its been almost 45 days since my background check was good, and still nothing. I just called HPD firearms division to follow up. Talk about a waste of 7 minutes, listening to long winded prompts only to be told sit and wait from the automated voice.  This tyrant police chief is a joke, just like the politicians over here.

Gosh I wonder why there's so many illegal guns everywhere 

I submitted my application in the first week in January, with everything that was needed being the new year.  HPD officer that is conducting the CCW applications called me first week of March, and told me my background check was done and good.  He said the next step was to get signed off by the Chief of police  Its been almost 45 days since my background check was good, and still nothing. I just called HPD firearms division to follow up. Talk about a waste of 7 minutes, listening to long winded prompts only to be told sit and wait from the automated voice.  This tyrant police chief is a joke, just like the politicians over here.

Remember that after 120 days, it's an automatic denial and you will have to pay another $150 to reapply, take another shooting qualification too.

Remember that after 120 days, it's an automatic denial and you will have to pay another $150 to reapply, take another shooting qualification too.

I just read the law.  It states if its an incomplete application after 120 days its dead.  Could find anything else besides that.  Am I missing something? 🤙

I just read the law.  It states if its an incomplete application after 120 days its dead.  Could find anything else besides that.  Am I missing something? 🤙

Correct. If the application is incomplete, i.e. multiple attempts have been made to contact the applicant to provide missing documentation/information with no result.

The 120 days does not apply if your application is complete and not missing anything.

Correct. If the application is incomplete, i.e. multiple attempts have been made to contact the applicant to provide missing documentation/information with no result.

The 120 days does not apply if your application is complete and not missing anything.

We hope this is what HPD abides by.



Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk