Other than the typical "without evidence" BS qualifier, this is a pretty descent synopsis of the road ahead.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-contested-scenarios-expl-idUSKBN2781FSI was saying before that there are lots of things that MIGHT happen, because the way the laws are written, and the fact that not all options have been tried in court, the "brackets" for "what happens if this, but not that" are many.
OMiGod thinks I'm crazy for suggesting that the entire election could be tossed out over one or two states failing to certify the results. After that, Congress would have to decide on the President and VP. This article shows how crazy
he is for thinking that won't be a potential outcome.
The article backs me up, saying this has never been tried in the past, so the decision on whether we can simply exclude states and their electoral votes is untested -- basically acting as if a few states are disqualified and don't exist for electoral college purposes. Would the 270 threshold remain, or is it recalculated as "half + 1" of the NEW TOTAL of electoral votes that are still being certified? What if the excluded state EC vote total has an odd number of votes, causing a fractional majority? Does the threshold round up to a whole vote requiring a majority + half, or is it enough the reach the rounded majority total but not have a whole vote to take the majority -- only half a vote above?
For example, let's say the new electoral total is 401 votes. Half that would be 200-1/2. Is 201 an actual majority (only half a vote above 200-1/2), or does the winner require a FULL VOTE above the minimum to win -- which means 202 is needed to win, or 200-1/2 + 1 = 201-1/2, or 202 votes required, since half votes don't exist. The details can get pretty messy.
So many questions, so few answers.
What's obvious is OMiGod wants to call people crazy and "conspiracy theorists" for sharing information that HE believes is fake news or illogical. We aren't making this shit up (unlike he seems to have a habit of doing). We are just sharing it. That's the exact kind of bullying and censorship that's happening on the Big Tech platforms right now. Is he here to steer this forum in that same direction?
Yet, he whines that he's picked on for having a different opinion. He can't see that him attacking ANYONE else over what they post is no different.
"Hypocrite" doesn't quite capture how he has been acting.