2aHawaii
General Topics => Political Discussion => Topic started by: punaperson on November 25, 2018, 04:40:08 PM
-
Goddamn these leftists "we" have elected are stupid fuckers. So fucking stupid they make national headlines:
Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz deletes tweet suggesting 'chemical weapons' used at US-Mexico border
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-sen-brian-schatz-deletes-tweet-claiming-chemical-weapons-used-at-us-mexico-border
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, tweeted Sunday that the use of tear gas against Central American migrants who attempted to enter the U.S. illegally may have been a violation of international agreements governing the use of chemical weapons -- before he backtracked.
The Associated Press reported that U.S. agents shot several rounds of the gas after migrants tried to penetrate several points along the border at the San Ysidro border crossing between Tijuana, Mexico, and California. Migrants sought to squeeze through gaps in wire, climb over fences and peel back metal sheeting to enter.
In response to the reports, Schatz initially tweeted: "Tear gas across the border against unarmed families is a new low." Approximately 45 minutes later, Schatz tweeted: "Who gave the order? Did it implement or contravene policy?" He then tweeted "WHO GAVE THE ORDER?" in all caps.
Schatz then asked: "Why tear gas? Is this consistent with the Conventions on Chemical Weapons?"
However, the tweet was posted for just a few minutes before it was deleted and replaced by this message: "Anyone uncomfortable with spraying tear gas on children is welcome to join the coalition of the moral and the sane. We can argue about other stuff when we’ve got our country back."
In an exchange with opinion writer Stephen Miller, Schatz admitted that "I went ahead and deleted the one about chemical weapons because I just don’t know enough about what happened." He then asked Miller: "Does this not strike you as excessive?"
* * * * *
I suspect any day now he will join Hawaii county councilperson, Puna representative Jen Ruggles in spouting the "U.S. war crimes against the kingdom of Hawaii illegal invasion illegal annexation" delusional absurdist rhetoric. Then he'll delete it and ask, "Does this not strike you as excessive?" Fucking moron.
-
I think him and Mazie are in a competition to see who is the biggest dumbshit. [/facepalm]
-
Almost every military member gets a face full of tear gas for the "experience" during chemical warfare training. Nobody ever dies from it.
Excessive? LOL!
Cry me a river .... (pun intended).
-
All the vids i saw, ZERO children. All able bodied males.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
Did you know there are TWO of them? Yes Dum Schatz has an identical twin brother. I hope he is not as stupid.
In any case, this Caucasian (I know he is a Jew) is making you hauoles look stupid. But no feel bad, Mazie is doing the same to us Asians.
-
Did you know there are TWO of them? Yes Dum Schatz has an identical twin brother. I hope he is not as stupid.
In any case, this Caucasian (I know he is a Jew) is making you hauoles look stupid. But no feel bad, Mazie is doing the same to us Asians.
Oui vay!
-
Oui vay!
That's what French Jews say? :rofl:
-
Hey, keep race out of this.
Obviously stupidity knows no racial boundary.
-
Hirono said something stupid recentlly, now schitz. Is gabbard next?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
Hirono said something stupid recentlly, now schitz. Is gabbard next?
"Next"? Surely you jest.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard eviscerates Trump as 'Saudi Arabia's bitch'
"Hey @realdonaldtrump: being Saudi Arabia’s bitch is not 'America First,'" the Hawaii Democrat tweeted.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/rep-tulsi-gabbard-eviscerates-trump-saudi-arabia-s-bitch-n939011
* * * * *
I referenced a "mainstream news media" source for this subject matter just to emphasize their idea of "reporting" does not include words like "wrote" or "said" or even "claimed", but "EVISCERATES"... now there's some objective who, what, when, where reporting if I've ever seen it. We can only imagine what they'd write if they WERE biased! :rofl:
-
That's what French Jews say? :rofl:
Hahahahaha :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
"Next"? Surely you jest.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard eviscerates Trump as 'Saudi Arabia's bitch'
"Hey @realdonaldtrump: being Saudi Arabia’s bitch is not 'America First,'" the Hawaii Democrat tweeted.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/rep-tulsi-gabbard-eviscerates-trump-saudi-arabia-s-bitch-n939011
* * * * *
I referenced a "mainstream news media" source for this subject matter just to emphasize their idea of "reporting" does not include words like "wrote" or "said" or even "claimed", but "EVISCERATES"... now there's some objective who, what, when, where reporting if I've ever seen it. We can only imagine what they'd write if they WERE biased! :rofl:
If that ninny is still in the national guard me wonders if she could be bought up on charges under the UCMJ (not familiar with national guard policies). My guess is if she said that while in uniform then yes but otherwise probably no. :o
-
"Next"? Surely you jest.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard eviscerates Trump as 'Saudi Arabia's bitch'
"Hey @realdonaldtrump: being Saudi Arabia’s bitch is not 'America First,'" the Hawaii Democrat tweeted.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/rep-tulsi-gabbard-eviscerates-trump-saudi-arabia-s-bitch-n939011
* * * * *
I referenced a "mainstream news media" source for this subject matter just to emphasize their idea of "reporting" does not include words like "wrote" or "said" or even "claimed", but "EVISCERATES"... now there's some objective who, what, when, where reporting if I've ever seen it. We can only imagine what they'd write if they WERE biased! :rofl:
I hope this blows up in her face. But so far, I see it more folks viewing it as an issue of "women power" and her standing up to Trump. She did catch a ton of heat about that comment on social media though, with tons of folks slamming her on Syria, Assad and the like.
That said, I'd really like folks to look more into what Tulsi has done for Hawaii. . .
-
That said, I'd really like folks to look more into what Tulsi has done for Hawaii. . .
You mean like work, advocate and vote to eliminate even more of our rights?
-
That said, I'd really like folks to look more into what Tulsi has done for Hawaii. . .
Has she done something really meaningful for Hawaii? Who knew?
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/browse?sponsor=412532
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/tulsi_gabbard/412532
I guess I shouldn’t be so sarcastic. She has co-sponsored and/or introduced 60 pieces of legislation since becoming a representative in 2013. Of which only 2 that she co-sponsored were enacted. Not a great success rate but at least she is doing something. Right?
-
You mean like work, advocate and vote to eliminate even more of our rights?
Has she done something really meaningful for Hawaii? Who knew?
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/browse?sponsor=412532
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/tulsi_gabbard/412532
I guess I shouldn’t be so sarcastic. She has co-sponsored and/or introduced 60 pieces of legislation since becoming a representative in 2013. Of which only 2 that she co-sponsored were enacted. Not a great success rate but at least she is doing something. Right?
I meant that as sarcasm. In my eyes/view, all she has really done is use her position as a platform to spout her personal views, and that's only what the public gets to see.
-
You mean like work, advocate and vote to eliminate even more of our rights?
You mean like missing 112 roll calls in almost 6 years. They meet an average of 138 days a year even though her constituents are expected to work an average of 260 days a year.
-
I meant that as sarcasm. In my eyes/view, all she has really done is use her position as a platform to spout her personal views, and that's only what the public gets to see.
I know exactly what you meant. :thumbsup:
If you look at the first link I provided, and view all the pieces of legislation that she did co-sponsor you’ll see your words were never more true. Nothing really benefits Hawaii and most are more “pet” bills and bills for special interest groups.
I was being sarcastic with you. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
-
I know exactly what you meant. :thumbsup:
If you look at the first link I provided, and view all the pieces of legislation that she did co-sponsor you’ll see your words were never more true. Nothing really benefits Hawaii and most are more “pet” bills and bills for special interest groups.
I was being sarcastic with you. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
Haha. Large coffee is finally kicking in. Yeah, I was pretty sure that was the case with you. Initially clarifying for PP, but added you as well. ;D
-
I meant that as sarcasm. In my eyes/view, all she has really done is use her position as a platform to spout her personal views, and that's only what the public gets to see.
Here's how I interpreted what you MIGHT have meant:
[Paraphrase] Gabbard was an ass IN THIS CASE...
"That said (same as "but"...), I'd really like folks to look more into what Tulsi has done for Hawaii. . ."
I'm prone to possible interpretations of that sort because I've overheard discussions at the range of people touting Democrat candidates who clearly favor restricting self-defense rights... while they're friggin' at the range! Fudds? Maybe. But whatever... get a fucking clue.
So please forgive me for not assuming that was sarcasm. :shaka:
-
If that ninny is still in the national guard me wonders if she could be bought up on charges under the UCMJ (not familiar with national guard policies). My guess is if she said that while in uniform then yes but otherwise probably no. :o
I to am not familiar with the UCMJ, but I thought that even if out of uniform, military personal cannot talk against the CIC. They lose that 1st amendment right when they sign up.
-
Here's how I interpreted what you MIGHT have meant:
[Paraphrase] Gabbard was an ass IN THIS CASE...
"That said (same as "but"...), I'd really like folks to look more into what Tulsi has done for Hawaii. . ."
I'm prone to possible interpretations of that sort because I've overheard discussions at the range of people touting Democrat candidates who clearly favor restricting self-defense rights... while they're friggin' at the range! Fudds? Maybe. But whatever... get a fucking clue.
So please forgive me for not assuming that was sarcasm. :shaka:
Nah. All good! :thumbsup:
As in texing, it is often difficult to convey and receive sarcasm on forum posts.
-
I to am not familiar with the UCMJ, but I thought that even if out of uniform, military personal cannot talk against the CIC. They lose that 1st amendment right when they sign up.
Active duty or NG when federalized is my understanding.
I think she is clear, but very misguided when she said this. Not going to help her at all other than with the committed liberal moonbats.
-
Active duty or NG when federalized is my understanding.
I think she is clear, but very misguided when she said this. Not going to help her at all other than with the committed liberal moonbats.
So she has the solid support of 80%+ of Hawaii voters!
-
So she has the solid support of 80%+ of Hawaii voters!
Keep in mind, typically less than half of Hawaiians eligible to vote, vote.
So she gets 80% of less than half. That is WAY less than a majority of the voters.
At best she gets 1/3 of the people to support her. In my world that is called an oligarchy.
-
I think she is clear, but very misguided when she said this. Not going to help her at all other than with the committed liberal moonbats.
It will help her because the DNC is united as 1 against Trump. Compared to the GOP uniting to back up other GOP members the DNC targets.
And since she is targeting Trump, this opens the doors for her in her party.
-
It will help her because the DNC is united as 1 against Trump.
Well, the democrat base seems to be swerving toward total moonbattery, so mebbe same-same?
-
Here hold my beer. Cortez compares invaders to Jews fleeing Germany.