INDIANAPOLIS — Eric Dietz, Ph.D., the former director of Homeland Security for the state of Indiana and 22-year Army veteran, says he is only interested in one thing when it comes to the debate over stationing armed personnel and teachers in America’s schools: saving lives.

Now a professor at Purdue University and director of the school’s Homeland Security Institute, Dietz could be the guy who — once and for all — destroys the left’s argument against putting more guns in schools. And it’s all based on numbers and facts.

That research? More guns in schools equal fewer deaths during active shooter situations.

At the 2014 National Rifle Association convention in Indianapolis on Friday, Dietz told TheBlaze that he set out to determine what realistic measures could be taken to reduce deaths during school shootings. Using an “agent-based modeling” method that he says is as straight forward as it gets, Dietz and the university were able to conclude that the “introduction of a minimal (10%) armed faculty in conjunction with [a] resource officer” could reduce overall casualties in school-related shootings by roughly 70 percent.



http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/26/meet-the-guy-who-could-once-and-for-all-destroy-the-lefts-argument-against-putting-more-guns-in-schools/

Sorry dude, while I'm with you on this, it will never fly with the progs.

It's based on logic, reason and actual math, all of which they apparently don't believe in.

They might read it if you put some pretty pictures of rainbows and unicorns, and maybe some flying monkey's on it! 

Thanks for posting.

This is the argument "they" have
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Jordan_Davis
Just saw msnbc interview Lucia McBath. Guns are the problem. Take away the gun and everything is unicorns and daisies.