Well, I'm surprised it took her almost two weeks after the Isla Vista stabbings/shootings/vehicular assaults to come up with this national legislation to allow anyone to target any firearm owner and have their guns taken away based upon... uh, hearsay? Or "concern"? Think anyone knowing any firearm owners may have any "concerns" about them? I'm sure the local legislature crew here has such a bill in the works already, if they haven't just copied this proposed national legislation or the California version that has already been proposed. I'm also sure that our Washington reps and senators will be fully behind this measure, but I'm going to send them my "thoughts" anyway. I wonder how severe the criminal and civil penalties are for filing an "unfounded" report? I can't find anything about the details of the actual bill... just press releases by "concerned" politicians.
"... it would help ensure that families
and others can also seek a
gun violence prevention warrant [these people can sure invent the euphemisms! And what about a "knife/hammer violence prevention warrant"?, since that Isla Vista guy killed half his victims with a knife, possibly after using a hammer first.] that would allow law enforcement to take
temporary [haha... I wonder how much it will cost in legal fees to get your firearms back... even if the charge against you is false?] possession of firearms that have already been purchased if a court determines [based upon the testimony of a "government-approved mental health specialist" as in last years Hawaii bill requiring mental health checks prior to firearm purchases by Roz Baker, Josh Green and Russell Ruderman?] that the individual poses a threat to themselves or others." I'm pretty sure that according to these legislators, simply owning, or wanting to own firearms is cause for alarm and concern, especially if you mention the word "self-defense".
https://www.boxer.senate.gov/en/press/releases/053014.cfm