The main deal is his father is not a us citizen and is a British subject. His mother at the time was too young to transfer citizenship to Barry. Also there is no proof they were even married!
I don't see that as a problem. We're talking about natural-born citizenship here, and apparently the immigration folks take that to mean that your mother birthed you within the borders of the US. That's why so many mamacitas sneak illegally into the US to have their babies, which are then automatically citizens of the US. Soooo, the problem then arises that you can't deport the mother if her child is a US citizen, and that's why they're called
Anchor Babies or Jackpot Babies.See sample discussion of this problem here:
http://www.theamericanresistance.com/issues/anchor_babies.htmlAnd as far as I can tell, there is no requirement that a President cannot be born out of wedlock. In fact, my opinion is that quite a number of them were bastards.
Also Obamas grandmother swears he's was born in Kenya.
One problem here is that it is difficult to prove a negative. In this case, it's her word against the purported Hawaiian birth documentation. Has the grandmother's statement been recorded somewhere? Let's be fair, here.
He has also spent close to $3m to cover up his records.
Well, so? You use the term "cover up" in a negative semantic way. How about "He has also spent close to $3m to
cover up research his records"? Let's be fair, here again.
Then we have the Indonesian citizen issue where he gave up his US citizenship to go to school in indo. There Is no paperwork to show he got back his US citizenship.
That may be a genuine problem, if true. I'd also be interested in documentation of the claims that he is a "constitutional scholar," which was touted during the election, but which seem to have faded away since then.
Terry "Not an Obama supporter, but let's be fair," 230RN
NOTE: Quotes were corrected by me.