Faith plays an important role in just about everything in life.

Either he made good points or he didn't.  Where are your opinions on those points?  You call his words "loaded", but you didn't say they were "inaccurate."

He didn't really support his points but of course not being supported doesn't dictate whether something is right. I think that if I heard more of what he had to say I would probably agree with most of his points.

I prefer facts from news though.

He didn't really support his points but of course not being supported doesn't dictate whether something is right. I think that if I heard more of what he had to say I would probably agree with most of his points.

I prefer facts from news though.

Sometimes the conclusions are all you need.  If you feel you are in need of more, then it's not his responsibility to spoon feed it all to you in a single video.

So seek out other articles and videos.  Maybe find things written or recorded ABOUT him by others.  Take the active role of fact finder, and stop relying on others to give you whatever it is you think is missing.

Sometimes the conclusions are all you need.  If you feel you are in need of more, then it's not his responsibility to spoon feed it all to you in a single video.

It isn't my responsibility to find things to validate his opinion.

If he is going to give his unsupported opinion and do so in a clearly slanted way then I am not going to take him seriously. This isn't some crazy expectation of news organizations. How do we benefit from this? Seems like it just serves to make us feel good about our political opinions rather than make us more informed.