January 6 Psyop (Read 12127 times)

drck1000

Re: January 6 Psyop
« Reply #60 on: November 09, 2021, 08:26:38 PM »
SNIP

 Just apply the same level of skepticism as you did when reading about Juicy Smollet.
Freudian. . .  ???

 :rofl:

hvybarrels

Re: January 6 Psyop
« Reply #61 on: November 09, 2021, 09:00:35 PM »
Being armed is irrelevant.
Evidence of the insurrection is that they tried to get in to stop the certification process to keep Biden from being president.

I don't think every protester who stepped foot into the building is an insurrectionist, I think most were just guilty of trespassing but presenting them all as just trespassers is misinformation. There is strong evidence against some of the people arrested that they were doing far more than just tresspassing.

I didn't say I don't gate about prisoners getting tortured, I just asked for proof they were getting tortured. Its not like liberals have the monopoly on making up claims to get money or attention. Just apply the same level of skepticism as you did when reading about Juicy Smollet.

"I think"

"Strong Evidence"

How come the rest of the world has to show you indisputable air tight evidence, yet we're all just supposed to accept whatever lazy propaganda talking points you throw out here?
Pretending to be offended does not make you a good person.

ren

Re: January 6 Psyop
« Reply #62 on: November 09, 2021, 09:14:22 PM »
"I think"

"Strong Evidence"

How come the rest of the world has to show you indisputable air tight evidence, yet we're all just supposed to accept whatever lazy propaganda talking points you throw out here?

Deeds Not Words

eyeeatingfish

Re: January 6 Psyop
« Reply #63 on: November 10, 2021, 08:02:34 PM »
"I think"

"Strong Evidence"

How come the rest of the world has to show you indisputable air tight evidence, yet we're all just supposed to accept whatever lazy propaganda talking points you throw out here?

You don't want me to think? I am not a mind reader so I can't make a solid statement as to what was going on inside their heads. I figured this would be obvious.

And since when did being objective and analytical become propaganda? I literally agreed with you that many of them were probably just trespassing and you aren't even fine with that? These aren't even talking points, these are burden of proof aspects of a criminal case. You have to be able to separate your personal beliefs about the reason for protest and what the people who entered the building did.

Plus I don't demand airtight proof without providing any evidence of what I say, stop making crap up and be an adult. Literally all you have to do is say "EEF, you said there is strong evidence, what evidence is there?" But your failure to do something that simple makes it appear you aren't interested in the truth, you just want to defend these people. You have to be able to separate your feelings on the issue with the actions those who entered the capitol took otherwise you are in no position to comment about the legal aspects of why different people are being charged with different things or not charged at all in these cases.

Jl808

Re: January 6 Psyop
« Reply #64 on: December 30, 2021, 08:02:01 AM »
Interesting video on twitter.

https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1476504908627165188

"How many January 6th protesters were actually working for the federal government? In October, I asked AG Garland while he was under oath and he refused to answer. He looked very nervous and worried when I showed him this video in that hearing."
I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: January 6 Psyop
« Reply #65 on: December 30, 2021, 04:48:42 PM »
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw