A hot woman with brains on gun control. I think I just fell in love.

Richard Fowler, like all anti-gun people usually argues by talking louder and not listening to others' opinions....no common sense....they are hypocritical idiots!

The key point for simplistic liberal minds is that when you get rid of the weapon, you can get rid of the NEXT weapon, etc.

IDEALLY there would be NO TOOLS IN THE WORLD possibly to be used as weapons.

If even hammers are outlawed, they would feel that is JUSTIFIED.

"So you are saying that you'd rather see someone murdered by a hammer?" That would be the statement we would hear, when there is nothing left except hammers.

Self-defense can be outlawed. "Nobody needs to know how to hurt another person."

Verbal abuse can be outlawed. "Nobody needs to suffer the emotional TRAUMA of being yelled at. It just is not civil behavior, and we are a civilized society."

Ad nauseum.

The converse is true and this argument of gun control is an infinite loop - like a game of Tic Tac Toe
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/23/us/world-war-vet-beating-death/index.html?hpt=hp_c3

Every time I hear Libs argue we need to get rid of all so-called instruments of violence, I think of the movie Demolition Man.

All the weapons and tools you might need for self defense were housed in a museum.  Nobody (LE especially) was prepared for protecting the public from a murderous maniac, because they became complacent in their supposed paradise.

The moral of that movie to me has always been that evil exists, and there is nothing you can do to totally eradicate it.  It's irresponsible and stupid to deny that fact. 

When you choose peace while the other side is attacking, that's not peace.  That's surrender.