Mmmm...mmmm....mmmm...

And people wonder why anti-gun folks have such an easy time poking holes in pro arguments? Funny how simple discussions escalate to schlong measuring contests or (whether intentional or not) something is said that can be interpreted as a threat.
The truth is that lasers increase your speed and accuracy in low or no light conditions.
I think you mean to say:
It is my opinion that lasers increase speed and accuracy in low or no light conditions. You're certainly entitled to having that opinion.
The only
truth is: Regardless of the sights one chooses, a shooter is only as good as the amount of practice they put into using it.

The reality is in total darkness or very low light situations some type of illumination is ideal.
True, that's why I carry a flashlight.
This is why every single law enforcement agency nationwide issues their pistols with some type of illumination. (tritium,laser,lights or some combination of these)
Ummm no. Over the years (and working for 4 agencies), I've been issued various sidearms...I've gone through three M9's all with standard "factory" sights, an HK USP with standard 3 dot, and currently carry an M11 (P228). Tritium, laser, rail mounted lights, etc. are options but not standard issue. Even if they were, proper training does not involve depending on any of those under any circumstances. We train using a flashlight because it is the only way to be sure of your target and whatever may be in the background.
If it strikes you, on any given day, you can close your eyes and "use the force." Hey, even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.
Does failure drills after being pepper sprayed count? If so, you can call me a Jedi master...I went 9 out of 10 the last time around. My 1 miss was low to the groin area, so I guess you're partly right about finding a nut.

A laser may help with accuracy, however, it has no relation to speed what so ever. In fact, most people need to turn their laser on with some form of button press or secondary manipulation; this in itself would be a slowing factor all together. The exeption, would possibly be a grip laser that turns on with pressure when the firearm is gripped. There is no causation that a laser makes you go faster. This argument would be quite similar to those who think decal stickers make the riceburner go faster!
Additionally, this still doesn't discount a laser has a great potential to give away your position. If lasers make people so quick and fast, how come fewer agencies, operators and contractors are utilizing them in day to day operations? If you want to test it, we can use air-soft and do force on force; I have no need, nor will I ever, go shoot at magnum firearms.
Perhaps speed in acquiring a target (if already turned on and weapon drawn), but other than that I know what you mean. And compromising ones position is exactly why most do NOT use visible lasers in tactical situations.
As far as "force on force", how many here have really done this type of training or been in actual combat? I only ask because it seems, whether its my kids (and friends) "talkin' sh!t", or some airsoft/paintball/firearm enthusiast on forums or in person, certain terms get tossed around...AND it always makes me chuckle a bit. I've done force on force training at FLETC and been deployed quite a few times. So from experience, I can say for an absolute fact that the only true measure of speed and accuracy in such situations involves real bullets or "sim" rounds (aka simunitions).
Sure you can dim lights and get out a stop watch, or whatever but what would such results really mean? Paper targets on a range don’t return fire and is not proof of force on force superiority. Try a warehouse clearing drill against a trained OPFOR unit of instructors.