Biden Has No Plans For Using Military To Evacuate U.S. Citizens Out Of Ukraine (Read 2201 times)

Inspector

Psaki: Biden Has No Plans For Using Military To Evacuate U.S. Citizens Out Of Ukraine If Russia Invades


https://www.dailywire.com/news/psaki-biden-has-no-plans-for-using-military-to-evacuate-u-s-citizens-out-of-ukraine-if-russia-invades?%3Futm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwtwitter


What a joke our president has turned out to be…
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Kuleana

Smells like the beginnings of a false flag operation.

Leave those Americans there; have some unidentified (Mercenaries) snipers or demolition experts kill some Americans; blame the Russians; then WWIII is on.

Classic playbook of the US empire.

eyeeatingfish

Is it the military's job to evacuate Americans in Ukraine? Saw a news story that Biden told Americans they should leave Ukraine. I could see if there was active battling in the streets but not at this point.

Flapp_Jackson

Is it the military's job to evacuate Americans in Ukraine? Saw a news story that Biden told Americans they should leave Ukraine. I could see if there was active battling in the streets but not at this point.

If there is a consulate or embassy, we protect that plot of land as if it's American soil.

So, if there are still Americans there, it's our duty to evacuate them using the military or any other means.

Do we need to wait until another Benghazi erupts?  We were the last foreign mission left there after all the other nations had pulled out following increased attacks in the area.

It's stupid to remain until the attacks are in the streets and at the gate.  That's like waiting to fire only after someone fires at you.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

If there is a consulate or embassy, we protect that plot of land as if it's American soil.

So, if there are still Americans there, it's our duty to evacuate them using the military or any other means.

Do we need to wait until another Benghazi erupts?  We were the last foreign mission left there after all the other nations had pulled out following increased attacks in the area.

It's stupid to remain until the attacks are in the streets and at the gate.  That's like waiting to fire only after someone fires at you.

I understand that, if there were active hostilities in the area then absolutely, use the military to get them out. But at this point I don't see anything wrong with simply issuing a statement recommending Americans to leave.

Flapp_Jackson

I understand that, if there were active hostilities in the area then absolutely, use the military to get them out. But at this point I don't see anything wrong with simply issuing a statement recommending Americans to leave.

Can do both.  Recommend evacuation, but offer military assistance if needed.

Again, no sense in waiting until the military is needed to send a few in for tightened security.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Can do both.  Recommend evacuation, but offer military assistance if needed.

Again, no sense in waiting until the military is needed to send a few in for tightened security.

So would we have military supply trucks driving around Ukraine picking up Americans at their residents? What role would the military play, just providing flights?

Flapp_Jackson

So would we have military supply trucks driving around Ukraine picking up Americans at their residents? What role would the military play, just providing flights?

Situations are fluid.  Escort vehicles/troops, additional security around the evac areas, drivers for those without transportation. extraction from hostile areas, etc.

When a location is being evacuated, the military provides a great number of services as needed.

Flights can remain commercial as long as available seats aren't a problem.  Airport security can be an issue, too.  Many foreign airports have terrible security.  We may decide to use military vs. commercial air just to avoid the possible threat of someone trying to bring down a plane full of Americans.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Situations are fluid.  Escort vehicles/troops, additional security around the evac areas, drivers for those without transportation. extraction from hostile areas, etc.

When a location is being evacuated, the military provides a great number of services as needed.

Flights can remain commercial as long as available seats aren't a problem.  Airport security can be an issue, too.  Many foreign airports have terrible security.  We may decide to use military vs. commercial air just to avoid the possible threat of someone trying to bring down a plane full of Americans.

Again, I certainly see a place for them in an evacuation, it just doesn't seem like we are at a point where the military is needed to complete this task.

Flapp_Jackson

Again, I certainly see a place for them in an evacuation, it just doesn't seem like we are at a point where the military is needed to complete this task.

Based on what?



The military also offers communications, satellite access, food, water, shelter, medicines and medical attention, electric generators, fuel -- all the things the military is able to take with them when they deploy, and which most people take for granted when they are not in a crisis situation.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

eyeeatingfish

Based on what?



The military also offers communications, satellite access, food, water, shelter, medicines and medical attention, electric generators, fuel -- all the things the military is able to take with them when they deploy, and which most people take for granted when they are not in a crisis situation.

Allow me to flip the question then, why should Biden use the military to evacuate troops?  Do you think Biden should be using troops to evacuate citizens at this point in time?

Flapp_Jackson

Allow me to flip the question then, why should Biden use the military to evacuate troops?  Do you think Biden should be using troops to evacuate citizens at this point in time?

Re-read what I already posted about that.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw