I called the NRA last week, and gave them the article info, staff writer name, etc.
This article is very misleading, as it tries to tie in strict gun restrictions result in "low death rates," which it conveniently doesn't define but leaves that to the readers imagination.
Is it saying strict gun laws results in "low death rates" is in low murder/death rates? Well, criminals, not law abiding citizens, are murdering. They then go on to compare our low ownership to death rate, to states with high ownership to high death rate, gleefully claiming high ownership equates to high death rates..."more guns equals more deaths." Well, maybe, maybe not...but we're talking about legally owned guns versus the availabiliy of illegal guns favored by criminals. NO WHERE would their conclusion of "more guns equals more deaths" hold up. They'd have to account for every other variable out there. Sorry, smoke n mirrors and just not true.
What I think we should keep in mind is NOT the low number of deaths, but the number of murders and other violent crimes that DON'T occur in Hawaii. I encourage everyone to read Lott's book "More Guns Less Crime." It's pretty dry, filled with statistics and charts. But if you can skip over these and read the way he ties in gun ownership, it's an easy read. Where there is high gun ownershp, especially where CCP is legal, there are low violent crime numbers. There is an increase in property crimes, though...attributed to a shift in illegal activities, criminals aren't that stupd and know if there's a chance you're carrying, they'd rather target your car in the mall parking lot or shoplift.
My 2 cents? A combination of reasonable gun laws (not including our CCP situation) and the lack of a more organized criminal element...we're just too far away to be caught up in interstate trafficing problems.
Aloha, Frank
SgtCUSMC