Tell us you don’t understand Bruen without telling us you don’t understand Bruen.

You mean someone can communicate a thought without explicitly stating that thought in literal verbiage?

That's crazy!   

Tell us you don’t understand Bruen without telling us you don’t understand Bruen.

Your opinion is noted.

Annnnnnd you conveniently missed that part....

So you are backing out of supporting your argument? Surely if it is in there you could post it and make me eat my words but instead this is your response.

You guys tell me to go read the decisions but then get angry when they don't say what you say they say....

So you are backing out of supporting your argument? Surely if it is in there you could post it and make me eat my words but instead this is your response.

You guys tell me to go read the decisions but then get angry when they don't say what you say they say....

Why do you draw that conclusion of me backing out?  Others and I already stated the correct information, you just refuse to admit you're wrong again and instead use other tactics to try to weasel your way out of an admission of being wrong.

We tell you to read it. You then still refuse to admit being wrong. Flapp post why you're still wrong, as I have less time to do so. You then move goal post or use other tactics to admit being wrong.

Even your statement of "you guys tell me to go read the decisions but then get angry when they don't say what you say they say..." is wrong. They decisions do say what we stated they say. YOU just refuse to admit it.

Why do you draw that conclusion of me backing out?  Others and I already stated the correct information, you just refuse to admit you're wrong again and instead use other tactics to try to weasel your way out of an admission of being wrong.

We tell you to read it. You then still refuse to admit being wrong. Flapp post why you're still wrong, as I have less time to do so. You then move goal post or use other tactics to admit being wrong.

Even your statement of "you guys tell me to go read the decisions but then get angry when they don't say what you say they say..." is wrong. They decisions do say what we stated they say. YOU just refuse to admit it.

Anyone claiming others are "getting angry" online is trolling.  It's a standard troll tactic.  When the facts don't go your way, start tossing out bogus assertions to try and get an emotional reaction.

Why do you draw that conclusion of me backing out?  Others and I already stated the correct information, you just refuse to admit you're wrong again and instead use other tactics to try to weasel your way out of an admission of being wrong.

I am saying that you didn't, that you are refusing to admit you are wrong.

We tell you to read it. You then still refuse to admit being wrong.

More like I read it, inform you that you are wrong, and you still refuse to admit being wrong. 

It's a standard troll tactic.  When the facts don't go your way, start tossing out bogus assertions to try and get an emotional reaction.

Spoken like an experienced troll Mr. dermatologist.

I am saying that you didn't, that you are refusing to admit you are wrong.

More like I read it, inform you that you are wrong, and you still refuse to admit being wrong. 

Annnnddd here's the blame shifting tactic. Thanks for playing.

Anyone claiming others are "getting angry" online is trolling.  It's a standard troll tactic.  When the facts don't go your way, start tossing out bogus assertions to try and get an emotional reaction.

Also, add in many other tactics due to lack of facts.

Spoken like an experienced troll Mr. dermatologist.

LOL!  You mad, Bro?

Just because i know more than you about skin problems (people in my family have had one or two), you try being derogatory as a way to recover your position?

When you can't attack the facts, attack the person.  You're so transparent, Troll Boy.

When you can't attack the facts, attack the person.  You're so transparent, Troll Boy.

This tactic comes after moving goal post, blaming without cause, etc...

LOL!  You mad, Bro?

Just because i know more than you about skin problems (people in my family have had one or two), you try being derogatory as a way to recover your position?

When you can't attack the facts, attack the person.  You're so transparent, Troll Boy.

Do I sound mad or is it that you need me to me to be mad to get your jollies? Sounds like you are upset I managed to troll the troll.

Your skin argument was idiotic anyway, arguing that psoriasis rarely occurs on the hands inherently means that it sometimes occurs on the hands, meaning my statement was right the whole time.

Do I sound mad or is it that you need me to me to be mad to get your jollies? Sounds like you are upset I managed to troll the troll.

Your skin argument was idiotic anyway, arguing that psoriasis rarely occurs on the hands inherently means that it sometimes occurs on the hands, meaning my statement was right the whole time.

Rare = highly unlikely

That means you are taking guesses that are outside the realm of what's probable.

Try again.

Rare = highly unlikely

That means you are taking guesses that are outside the realm of what's probable.

Try again.

Wrong.

Rare, highly unlikely, or whatever other synonym you want to insert still means it happens sometimes. Thus my point is true.
Are you mad bro?