nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us! (Read 4028 times)

sliver

nobody saw this?  either way, it seems to be good news for us!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323809304578428552342222358.html

sliver

Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2013, 01:40:42 AM »
The centerpiece of a Democrat-led gun-control effort—a plan to expand the system of background checks aimed at detecting buyers ineligible to own guns—failed in a 54-46 vote, six votes shy of the 60 needed to advance. Shortly afterward, the Senate blocked a proposal to ban the manufacture and sale of certain semiautomatic rifles often called assault weapons and ban high-capacity ammunition magazines. It drew 40 votes, with 60 senators opposed.
 
Mr. Obama denounced the Senate action in the White House Rose Garden, where he was joined by victims of gun violence, including former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D., Ariz.), who was gravely injured in a mass shooting. "This was a pretty shameful day for Washington. But this effort is not over," the president said.
 
Supporters of the background-check measure had hoped the co-sponsorship of Sen. Pat Toomey, a conservative Republican from Pennsylvania, would draw in his party colleagues. But only four GOP senators joined 50 of the Senate's 55 Democrats and independents in support.
 
Wednesday's votes showed that little has changed in the politics of gun control in the aftermath of the Newtown, Conn., shootings, which left 20 children and six adult staff members dead at an elementary school, as well as the attacker's mother. Support for tighter laws is strong among most Democrats, but Republicans and those Democrats from GOP-leaning states proved reluctant to vote to tighten access to firearms.
 
The Senate isn't expected to take a final vote on its package of gun-control legislation, in essence leaving the issue tabled. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) took a procedural step Wednesday that would enable lawmakers to return to the bill if dynamics changed.
 
But that prospect seemed unlikely, and the Republican-controlled House of Representatives is unlikely to initiate any gun-control legislation in the absence of a Senate-passed bill.

GZire

Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2013, 08:47:03 AM »
Quote
Mr. Obama denounced the Senate action in the White House Rose Garden, where he was joined by victims of gun violence, including former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D., Ariz.), who was gravely injured in a mass shooting. "This was a pretty shameful day for Washington. But this effort is not over," the president said.


Indeed it is a shameful day.........when the President doesn't recognize the will of the people who he is supposed to be serving.

SpeedTek

  • Trade Count: (+44)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4749
  • Total likes: 126
  • Car Nut, Machinist, Gunsmith & Monkey
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
    • X-Ring on the WWW
Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2013, 10:04:50 AM »
My big problem is the backdrop. People of gun violence. Which has nothing to do with us law abiding citizens!
Political Correctness is FOS
I collect M1 Carbines, PM me if youre selling!
& Bolt Action 308s also 10/22 Rugers.
Buying STOCK Ruger 10/22 parts and bits, PM me.
Now doing Vintage VW Parts!

BUD

Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2013, 11:06:53 AM »
Funny, the article doesn't claim that 90% of the American people wanted this legislation????  What gives??? :wtf:
It is what it is.

230RN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Total likes: 71
  • But they're [u]supposed[/u] to be military-style!
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2013, 05:40:08 AM »
The WSJ is one of the more neutral MSM outlets.  In today's atmosphere of rabidly anti-gun, extreme leftist yellow journalism, that makes them almost pro-gun, to my mind.

Almost.

The term "fair and balanced" reporting is an oxymoron to me.  All I want is "accurate" reporting.  You can have "fair and balanced" op-ed pieces, which is OK by me, but too often what should be straight reporting somehow morphs  into an opinion piece.

Terry, 230RN
« Last Edit: April 19, 2013, 05:46:29 AM by 230RN »
I do believe that the radical and crazy notion that the Founders meant what they said, is gradually soaking through the judicial system.

robtmc

Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #6 on: April 19, 2013, 07:26:01 AM »

Indeed it is a shameful day.........when the President doesn't recognize the will of the people who he is supposed to be serving.
What is shameful is a usurper that so willfully wanted to dismantle the Constitution, and then made it so personal.

Others have noted his rather bland reaction to the muzzie bombings in Boston in contrast to his petulant temper tantrum when Congress (and the American people) told him to go molest himself.

Malignant narcissist...........

230RN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Total likes: 71
  • But they're [u]supposed[/u] to be military-style!
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: nobody saw this? either way, it seems to be good news for us!
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2013, 09:24:22 AM »
Yeah, I thought the executive branch wa supposed to execute, in the sense of carrying out, the laws of the nation.

Not "execute" them in the sense of destroying them.

Heh.  Silly me.

Terry
I do believe that the radical and crazy notion that the Founders meant what they said, is gradually soaking through the judicial system.