Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 601529 times)

bass monkey

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1220 on: December 16, 2020, 12:41:58 PM »
Here, here...

https://republicanstory.com/trump-attorney-jenna-ellis-were-gonna-fight-regardless-of-what-happens-come-january-6/

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Did you swap links after making me read that bullshit AOC spewing.
Oh man

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1221 on: December 16, 2020, 12:43:51 PM »

Sounds like the states are now racing each other to de certify their electoral votes!!
We’ll see what happens. Unlike others here I don’t try and tell others what to think and how to act. The voting machines are going to need to show fraudulent activity before that will happen. But if they do and the legislators decertify the election results then I think other states will follow suit. Just realize a lot of things have to happen in a certain order for all of this to be meaningful. But we should know by early next week what direction things will take.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1222 on: December 16, 2020, 12:55:32 PM »
We’ll see what happens. Unlike others here I don’t try and tell others what to think and how to act. The voting machines are going to need to show fraudulent activity before that will happen. But if they do and the legislators decertify the election results then I think other states will follow suit. Just realize a lot of things have to happen in a certain order for all of this to be meaningful. But we should know by early next week what direction things will take.
You mean facts and reality aren't settled by consensus?  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?! 

If consensus was gravity doesn't exist, I'd like to be offered the opportunity to argue otherwise.  All it will take is a hammer and said person making the counter argument. . .

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1223 on: December 16, 2020, 01:04:22 PM »
You mean facts and reality aren't settled by consensus?  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?! 

If consensus was gravity doesn't exist, I'd like to be offered the opportunity to argue otherwise.  All it will take is a hammer and said person making the counter argument. . .
Facts and reality don’t matter to some here. But since the majority of Americans are against you, no soup for you.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1224 on: December 16, 2020, 01:07:21 PM »
Facts and reality don’t matter to some here. But since the majority of Americans are against you, no soup for you.
I don’t like soup anyways :nananana:

 :rofl:

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1225 on: December 16, 2020, 01:10:44 PM »
Did you swap links after making me read that bullshit AOC spewing.
Oh man
Trying to keep up, not easy. I'm a boomer, trying to keep up with young fellows.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1226 on: December 16, 2020, 02:27:50 PM »
A suggestion for the future given the evidence thus far...

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1227 on: December 16, 2020, 02:31:43 PM »
In light of all the baseless unfounded conspiracy theories lacking any verifiable evidence thus far, this seems perfectly reasonable... no?

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1228 on: December 16, 2020, 02:38:24 PM »
I don't know how legit investigative report Catherine Herridge got a job with CBS... I figured maybe it was an attempt to shut her down... but... every few months (instead of formerly almost every day) she comes up with something that sees the light of day even at CBS...



Brief video with Ratcliffe:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1338507862746787843

EDIT: Report release blocked until January. Fuckers.

They’re Screwing Trump AGAIN! — DNI Notified “By Career Intelligence Officials” That They WILL NOT MEET December 18 Deadline on Foreign Threats in 2020 Election!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/update-screwing-trump-dni-notified-career-intelligence-officials-will-not-meet-december-18-deadline-foreign-threats-2020-election/

« Last Edit: December 16, 2020, 02:47:27 PM by punaperson »

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1229 on: December 16, 2020, 02:40:41 PM »
A suggestion for the future given the evidence thus far...


Excellent idea! It is about time someone stands up for us voters.
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1230 on: December 16, 2020, 02:53:44 PM »
Trump lawyer spinning baseless conspiracy theories.

Trump Campaign Attorney Tells Senate Committee Over 42,000 People Voted More Than Once in Nevada

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/trump-campaign-attorney-tells-senate-committee-42000-people-voted-nevada-video/

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Wednesday held an oversight hearing to examine irregularities in the 2020 election.

Trump campaign attorney Jessie Binnall said more than 42,000 people voted more than once in Nevada.

Mr. Binnall has argued this before but he was able to present his findings to powerful lawmakers on the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Wednesday.

Binnall said people were able to vote more than once by using different variations of their first name such as “William” and “Bill” – Other individuals were able to register under a married name and a maiden name.

At least 1,500 dead people are recorded as voting and more than 19,000 people voted even though they didn’t live in Nevada.

Binnall said there is a minimum of 130,000 instances of voter fraud.

Video in tweet: https://twitter.com/i/status/1339263888785776640

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1231 on: December 16, 2020, 02:58:39 PM »

I'm hoping Starr will be appointed as one of the special prosecutors to investigate the overall election irregularities or to investigate the Biden crime family financial and national security issues.


Ken Starr: Pennsylvania “Flagrantly Violated” Laws Ahead of Presidential Election

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/ken-starr-pennsylvania-flagrantly-violated-laws-ahead-presidential-election-video/

The Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on Wednesday held an oversight hearing to examine irregularities in the 2020 election.

Former special prosecutor and solicitor general Ken Starr testified before the senate committee as an expert witness.

Judge Starr said that the state of Pennsylvania “flagrantly violated” laws ahead of the election by circumventing the state legislature and creating law out of thin air through its state supreme court.

When the Pennsylvania state legislature refused to extend the election for three days and accept mail-in ballots without postmarks, Democrat Governor Wolf ran to the PA supreme court where 5 Marxists outnumber the 2 conservative judges.

The PA supreme court changed election laws ahead of Election Day which not only violated the state constitution, it also violated the US Constitution.

Judge Starr said in response to Senator Rand Paul, “There is a very important principle here…. Constitution is very clear that it is the prerogative of state legislatures to determine what these rules and laws are, and that was, I must say, flagrantly violated in Pennsylvania, and perhaps elsewhere as well.”

Ken Starr also argued that Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution gives plenary power to the state legislatures to choose their electors.

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1232 on: December 16, 2020, 03:09:42 PM »
A more general picture of the situation... we have to hope the evidence sees the light of day enough to force the cowards to act...

The Fraudulent 2020 Election Is History Unfolding before Our Eyes

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/the_fraudulent_2020_election_is_history_unfolding_before_our_eyes.html

History is usually written long after historical events play themselves out in real life.  It's rare to understand the gravity of historical events as they are actually happening.

For example, I was in the Army and stationed in West Germany when the Berlin Wall came down in November of 1989.  It was news where we were, but I don't think many of us in Rheinberg really understood that the epochal event of our generation was playing itself out only a few hundred miles away.  We look back at it today as the touchstone that it is — the death knell of the Soviet Union.  But at the time, most of us didn't recognize it as such.

That's likely because for all of my life, and most of my parents' lives, the Soviet Union was the grand villain, the ubiquitous enemy, a fount of evil that simply was.  It was the perpetual enemy to be feared above all else, and it was the reason I and hundreds of thousands of others spent weeks, months, or years training to counter attacks coming from Poland or East Germany or the Soviet Union itself.

In an environment where the Soviets being enemies was as natural as gravity, it was hard to see the fall of the Wall changing the world.  But it did.  September 11 was something different altogether.  Most of the country was going about its normal business that morning, another mundane Tuesday.  Then the first plane hit.  It was a stunning event, but for a moment, we thought it was a tragedy of an accident.  The kind of bad thing that sometimes happens.  The moment the second plane hit, everyone in America knew that something was going on.  When those two buildings, those two signs of American strength and prosperity, came down, we knew that the world had changed.

And now we sit here, two decades later, and we are at a point in history no less important than the fall of the Berlin Wall or the attack on the Twin Towers.  When the Soviets or the Islamic terrorists were the enemy, we understood exactly what was at stake: our nation and our culture.  Today, both of those things are in peril, but in a far more pernicious way.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1233 on: December 16, 2020, 03:12:43 PM »
Senator Rand Paul is NOT a Trump fan by any means.  But, he is a "real doctor," specializing in cataract and glaucoma surgeries, LASIK procedures, and corneal transplants.   :thumbsup:

"The election was in many ways stolen."

Video overlaps with puna's post.

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1234 on: December 16, 2020, 03:17:29 PM »
Just for fun I fact checked the first accusation in this recent article spree.

Turns out it's fake news as predicted. Be careful what you believe in folks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.statesman.com/amp/114805036

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1235 on: December 16, 2020, 03:21:32 PM »

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1236 on: December 16, 2020, 03:31:00 PM »
Just for fun I fact checked the first accusation in this recent article spree.

Turns out it's fake news as predicted. Be careful what you believe in folks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.statesman.com/amp/114805036
Just for fun I fact checked your fact check (from hard left "PolitiFact" in fact).

They provide no substantial, much less adjudicated proof that the claims made by the Trump lawyers re illegally cast ballots are false. All they claim is that they cannot confirm that the claims are true or false. And that, folks, is what you call fake news. A fake fact check.

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1237 on: December 16, 2020, 03:35:32 PM »
Just for fun I fact checked the first accusation in this recent article spree.

Turns out it's fake news as predicted. Be careful what you believe in folks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.statesman.com/amp/114805036

What facts did your "fact check" article rely upon to dispute the claim?

None.  Zero.  Zilch. 

They simply printed:  PolitiFact’s ruling: False

Then, under "Why", they said:

Quote
PolitiFact reached out to Trump’s campaign, a law office representing the campaign,
and to the Nevada Republican Party seeking information. We did not hear back.

At this point, the claims are unproven.

Correct me if I'm wrong (which you don't have a problem doing even when I'm right), but false and unproven are not synonyms.

Example:  OJ was not found guilty, but that does not mean the charges are false -- only that they are unproven.
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

drck1000

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1238 on: December 16, 2020, 03:48:06 PM »
Just for fun I fact checked your fact check (from hard left "PolitiFact" in fact).

They provide no substantial, much less adjudicated proof that the claims made by the Trump lawyers re illegally cast ballots are false. All they claim is that they cannot confirm that the claims are true or false. And that, folks, is what you call fake news. A fake fact check.
Because Whoopi and Colbert says so. . . dude. . .

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1239 on: December 16, 2020, 03:53:52 PM »
Correct me if I'm wrong (which you don't have a problem doing even when I'm right), but false and unproven are not synonyms.
Semantics. I bet.