1. 2aHawaii
  2. General Topics
  3. Political Discussion
  4. Election Fraud Evidence Thread
Print
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 143

Election Fraud Evidence Thread (Read 601818 times)

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1280 on: December 17, 2020, 01:44:15 PM »
Quote from: punaperson on December 17, 2020, 01:30:00 PM
No idea if this is "true", but I wouldn't doubt it based upon some of the personalities there... seems like a LOT of people are upset about this whole election irregularities thing...



Two out of nine clearly supporting "us"... that really really really sucks.
That is really pathetic!

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Logged

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1281 on: December 17, 2020, 01:50:28 PM »
Logged

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1282 on: December 17, 2020, 02:25:56 PM »
Quote from: Jl808 on December 17, 2020, 01:07:31 PM
Assassination attempt on a Michigan voter fraud witness caught on video.

https://parler.com/post/d760dfe5c51a4d8992edcd03f7d39e39

I believe this is fake news i saw this before with a different
headline.
Logged

Flapp_Jackson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1283 on: December 17, 2020, 02:43:34 PM »
Quote from: omnigun on December 17, 2020, 02:25:56 PM
I believe this is fake news i saw this before with a different
headline.

Logged
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;
the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1284 on: December 17, 2020, 03:00:12 PM »
Quote from: Flapp_Jackson on December 17, 2020, 02:43:34 PM


Unlike you I don't believe everything and fakenews

MICHIGAN — Police in Sterling Heights are investigating a shooting that happened over the weekend at a condominium complex.

One woman was hurt but her injuries weren’t life-threatening.

The shooting was captured on surveillance video and shows the suspect shooting into the woman’s car from just a few feet away.

The shooting happened Saturday, Nov. 28 at the Park Place condominiums off Big Beaver near Dequindre.

The victim got into her car and reversed just as a person in a pick up truck began pulling away. The two cars almost collided, then the person in the truck got out and fired several shots into the woman’s vehicle.

The woman sped off out of the parking lot and the suspect in the truck followed.

Then, moments later, the woman returned to the home in her car and pulled up onto the lawn, got out of the car and ran inside.

The suspect in the truck also was seen coming back into view of the camera before the driver sped off.

It’s not known right now if the victim and suspect knew each other.

It’s unclear right now if the woman was shot or if she sustained other injuries.
Logged

aletheuo137

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1285 on: December 17, 2020, 04:18:54 PM »
Double secret probation

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

Logged

hvybarrels

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1286 on: December 17, 2020, 07:46:39 PM »
Quote from: omnigun on December 17, 2020, 03:00:12 PM
Unlike you I don't believe everything and fakenews

That is exactly what you do. If a giant corporate media source told you that the sky is red it would take about 3 seconds before you showed up here calling us all sky deniers.
Logged
If you dissolve your enemies in acid, technically that's turning your problems into a solution.

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1287 on: December 18, 2020, 03:57:42 AM »
Excuse me if this is a duplicate of another post:

Unconstitutional? Wisconsin city election officials sought private money to register voters

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/documents-show-wi-municipal-authorities-sought-use-grant-money-voter
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1288 on: December 18, 2020, 04:56:56 AM »
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1289 on: December 18, 2020, 03:48:06 PM »
Video at the story link. Notice the "official" doesn't say when the concern expressed by the counters, that they have multiple ballots with the same signature, will be dealt with, if at all... just "I know you have concerns". Why not address the concern specifically as to how it will be dealt and when and where by whom?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-sec-state-official-caught-video-telling-volunteers-count-multiple-ballots-signature-audit-votes-antrim-county/

MI Sec of State Official Caught On Video Telling Volunteers To Count “Multiple Ballots with the very Same Signature” During “Audit” Of Votes In Antrim County

Before her so-called audit was completed, Sec of State Benson explained the purpose of the “risk limited audit” to the media while ensuring the integrity of the elections in Michigan:

“While we know the machine tabulators functioned properly in Antrim, we are conducting this audit to assure the public of what countless officials from both parties at the federal, state and local levels have already confirmed – that this was the most secure election in our nation’s history and the certified results are an accurate reflection of the will of the voters,” adding, “It is time for Michigan, and the nation to once and for all dismiss the meritless disinformation campaign that seeks to undermine the integrity of our election and move forward in support of our collective democracy.”

Mr. DePerno, who acted as an observer to the “risk-limited audit,” doesn’t agree with Ms. Benson about the integrity of Michigan’s election and has provided us with video and photographic evidence to prove that he was again able to debunk her statement about the “most secure election in our nation’s history.”
Logged

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1290 on: December 18, 2020, 03:55:29 PM »
Quote from: punaperson on December 18, 2020, 03:48:06 PM
Video at the story link. Notice the "official" doesn't say when the concern expressed by the counters, that they have multiple ballots with the same signature, will be dealt with, if at all... just "I know you have concerns". Why not address the concern specifically as to how it will be dealt and when and where by whom?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/mi-sec-state-official-caught-video-telling-volunteers-count-multiple-ballots-signature-audit-votes-antrim-county/

MI Sec of State Official Caught On Video Telling Volunteers To Count “Multiple Ballots with the very Same Signature” During “Audit” Of Votes In Antrim County

Before her so-called audit was completed, Sec of State Benson explained the purpose of the “risk limited audit” to the media while ensuring the integrity of the elections in Michigan:

“While we know the machine tabulators functioned properly in Antrim, we are conducting this audit to assure the public of what countless officials from both parties at the federal, state and local levels have already confirmed – that this was the most secure election in our nation’s history and the certified results are an accurate reflection of the will of the voters,” adding, “It is time for Michigan, and the nation to once and for all dismiss the meritless disinformation campaign that seeks to undermine the integrity of our election and move forward in support of our collective democracy.”

Mr. DePerno, who acted as an observer to the “risk-limited audit,” doesn’t agree with Ms. Benson about the integrity of Michigan’s election and has provided us with video and photographic evidence to prove that he was again able to debunk her statement about the “most secure election in our nation’s history.”
Isn’t this the same county where they performed a forensic audit on one tabulator and found a built in 68% bias to Biden. And when they hand counted instead of recounting using the tabulators they found Trump won by a landslide? And they decertified their results to Trump? I do believe this is the case. Or am I wrong?
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1291 on: December 18, 2020, 04:26:49 PM »
Quote from: Inspector on December 18, 2020, 03:55:29 PM
Isn’t this the same county where they performed a forensic audit on one tabulator and found a built in 68% bias to Biden. And when they hand counted instead of recounting using the tabulators they found Trump won by a landslide? And they decertified their results to Trump? I do believe this is the case. Or am I wrong?
Yeah, that's the county. I posted the link to the forensic audit results somewhere above...
Logged

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1292 on: December 18, 2020, 04:31:27 PM »
Quote from: punaperson on December 18, 2020, 04:26:49 PM
Yeah, that's the county. I posted the link to the forensic audit results somewhere above...
At least you know one person is paying attention!   :rofl:
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1293 on: December 19, 2020, 06:22:35 AM »
It turns out that Sidney Powell’s Kraken Lawsuit has been put on the SCOTUS docket. It is due to be heard January 16. It includes the newly released Antrim County MI forensic audit report about the fraudulent voting machines tilted in favor of Biden by 68%. Still no guarantee that it will be heard. But at least it’s there.

Taking into consideration the statements made by Lin Wood a couple of days ago that he has phone conversation recordings of Justice John Roberts and Justice Stephen Breyer discussing how to keep Trump from being voted into office I would say that SCOTUS is tainted. They have been infiltrated by the Deep State and should resign immediately. Even if they don’t they should recuse themselves from hearing any Trump related lawsuits. They are obviously biased. If they don’t recuse themselves The Kraken won’t be heard. If they do then there is a chance it will. JMHO
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

punaperson

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1294 on: December 19, 2020, 07:46:42 AM »
Okay, "no idea if this is true..."... it's not. Sounded to good to be true... I'm thinking the same re the phone call between Roberts and Breyer... that'd be "a smoking gun"...

DEBUNKED: No shouting match at Supreme Court — building was closed

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Last night, the Wiz predicted the rumors about the Supreme Court justices screaming and cursing over the Texas election case was most likely fake news. It sounded too good to be true. Plus, the source of the information, an unnamed Supreme Court clerk, seemed off. SCOTUS clerks are not prone to leak and court is notorious for being a tightly run ship.

FAKE NEWS CLAIM: “The Justices went into a closed room…When Texas case was brought up he said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting…afraid of what would happen if they did right thing…Moral cowardice”

According to the Epoch Times, the Supreme Court spokesperson announced:

“The Court has been conducting its conferences remotely by phone since March when the building closed due to the pandemic.”

The spox’s claim checks out. The court has indeed been conducting hearings and deliberations (conferences) remotely by phone since the spring due to COVID-19. Moreover, the Supreme Court building has been closed.

Thus, the justices were never in “closed room” when they discussed the Texas lawsuit. They spoke about the case by phone.

I’m sorry to burst your bubble, but the rumored shouting match is disinformation. You got played.

Quote from: punaperson on December 17, 2020, 01:30:00 PM
No idea if this is "true", but I wouldn't doubt it based upon some of the personalities there... seems like a LOT of people are upset about this whole election irregularities thing...



Two out of nine clearly supporting "us"... that really really really sucks.
Logged

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1295 on: December 19, 2020, 07:49:05 AM »
I was actually just about to cite that fake news but was beat.  Then again no one here would believe me anyway. 
« Last Edit: December 19, 2020, 09:47:37 AM by omnigun »
Logged

Inspector

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1296 on: December 19, 2020, 07:58:27 AM »
Quote from: punaperson on December 19, 2020, 07:46:42 AM
Okay, "no idea if this is true..."... it's not. Sounded to good to be true... I'm thinking the same re the phone call between Roberts and Breyer... that'd be "a smoking gun"...

DEBUNKED: No shouting match at Supreme Court — building was closed

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Last night, the Wiz predicted the rumors about the Supreme Court justices screaming and cursing over the Texas election case was most likely fake news. It sounded too good to be true. Plus, the source of the information, an unnamed Supreme Court clerk, seemed off. SCOTUS clerks are not prone to leak and court is notorious for being a tightly run ship.

FAKE NEWS CLAIM: “The Justices went into a closed room…When Texas case was brought up he said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting…afraid of what would happen if they did right thing…Moral cowardice”

According to the Epoch Times, the Supreme Court spokesperson announced:

“The Court has been conducting its conferences remotely by phone since March when the building closed due to the pandemic.”

The spox’s claim checks out. The court has indeed been conducting hearings and deliberations (conferences) remotely by phone since the spring due to COVID-19. Moreover, the Supreme Court building has been closed.

Thus, the justices were never in “closed room” when they discussed the Texas lawsuit. They spoke about the case by phone.

I’m sorry to burst your bubble, but the rumored shouting match is disinformation. You got played.
I saw that the shouting match was debunked. But I am still not sure about the recording according to Lin Wood. He called it a smoking gun but he has not released as of yet. If it is true. I can’t rely on anything I hear except from reliable sources and he is the only source at this point. If it is true I am going to assume he is going to drop it to make the biggest splash. Or we will never hear another word about it. So we’ll just have to wait and see.

So, let’s assume it is true. And he is holding it like a poker hand. Does he play his hand if he gets a Trump case before SCOTUS hears the case? To see if they recuse themselves. Or motion for them to recuse themselves. Or does he wait to see what ruling he may get and then drop it on them if it does not go his way? And now if it is not true, it is an interesting bluff.  :rofl:
Logged
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

omnigun

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1297 on: December 19, 2020, 08:04:19 AM »
The phone recording is probably fake too.  No one holds "smoking guns" like that.   Many have said they have evidence or recordings to only never produce them.   I find it hard to believe the justices would ever have a convo like that. 
Logged

ren

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1298 on: December 19, 2020, 08:08:42 AM »
.
Logged
Deeds Not Words

macsak

Re: Election Fraud Evidence Thread
« Reply #1299 on: December 19, 2020, 08:26:13 AM »
Quote from: omnigun on December 19, 2020, 07:49:05 AM
I was actually just about to site that fake news but was beat.  Then again no one here would believe me anyway.

easier to believe someone who can spell...
Logged
Print
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 143
« previous next »