SOOOO MANY    not mass fraud.  Every election has had some minor amounts of fraud.   Fix the issues and move on doesn't change the election results.

There's been no verification of the results, as is being made plain now in the current audit.

So, your theory is just that.  No proof in court that the election results were accurate and legitimate.

Elections results have been certified and recorded.  You must disprove that.  Not the other way around.

You know what I meant.  Certified results are NOT accurate when the audits are finding one batch of "errors" and double-counted ballots after another.

Keep grasping at those "it's official!" straws.  Election results have already been overturned due to ballot machine screwups.

You're a fool to believe the people running the elections want the truth to be found out.

Keep posting the SAME LAME BULLSHIT on this thread nonstop.  The election was stolen.  The more you cry about audits, the more you support illegal and unconstitutional actions by the Democrats.

Just stop.

This "errors" are not enough to change the results keep trying/dreaming

This is the Russian investigation all over again.  Wasted effort and tax payers dollars.

This "errors" are not enough to change the results keep trying/dreaming

This is the Russian investigation all over again.  Wasted effort and tax payers dollars.

You have PROOF of that statement?

By definition, if the audits are not verifying the ballots and counts as they should be intended to do, then you have no evidence that the certified results are verified results.

Anyone with the authority can "certify" the things under their scope of certification.  Doesn't make it true.

I bought a "Certified" Pre-Owned Mercedes C230 -- a "loaner" that had 15K miles on it.  In almost exactly 3 years, the transmission failed.  The certification, stating they'd inspected and tested the car's main components to be as good as new (they provided a 3 year warranty for those parts) wasn't worth the paper it was printed on. 

So, keep posting your unsupported OPINION.  You're not saying anything new.

The lack of proof of mass fraud is my proof.  Many audits have been carried out, none change the outcome.  You don't have to prove that you didn't commit a crime, they have to prove that you did.   So keep saying lies and wishing for the impossible. Democrats did it for 4+ years,  its time for republicans to carry the torch now I guess.

This "errors" are not enough to change the results keep trying/dreaming

This is the Russian investigation all over again.  Wasted effort and tax payers dollars.

Ever heard the saying “never interrupt your opponent when he’s making a mistake?”

If there was really nothing to see the dems would be all for these audits. It would be in their best interest to allow these investigations to bare zero fruit and in the end the republicans and Trump would look like idiots and support would plummet. There is no other logical explanation for fighting these audits.

That's where you're wrong and omni is right. (sarcasm)

Same reason why Trump let the Russia investigation hoax continue.  He let the Ukraine investigation continue, not like Biden who stopped the Ukraine investigation into his son some years ago.

Trump is the most vetted politician in history.  For 5 years, the fake news and DNC tried to dig for trash on him and found nothing.  But hey, the guy who says mean things is gone, so the USA is so much in a better spot today right?

We will soon see,  criminal charges are apparently incoming. 

We will soon see,  criminal charges are apparently incoming.  The courts will decide if he truly was the "most vetted politician"

I know I'm not supposed to feed the Trolls.
But all I have for you and all the Democrats in Hawaii is this;
“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin’s death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners. He became part of a post-Stalin, short-lived ruling troika until he was executed for treason after Nikita Khrushchev’s coup d’etat in 1953.

I despise Democrats and RINOs.

You are correct. The new AG who stated even before looking at any evidence because she was not the NYAG yet, but a candidate stated she would charge Trump. 

No bias there...

Nope she biased, but evidence is not.  Evidence wins in the end.  You can't make that up.

Nope she biased, but evidence is not.  Evidence wins in the end.  You can't make that up.