If you haven't found out yet, you have no proof it was related. You have about as much proof of someone got the vaxx and ended up getting hit by a bus, is the vaxx responsible?
You're totally full of shit you stupid moron. A person who makes a claim has the burden of proving the claim. macsak made a claim. He has the burden of proof for substantiating his claim. He obviously has no evidence at all that would substantiate his claim that "someone" (after "two months") is confused about causation vs. coincidence.
I don't have to prove anything, you fucking idiot, because I never made a claim. I never claimed "it was related", nor anything else. I know your IQ and reading comprehension skills are extremely low, but seriously. I'd say this is a new low even for you, but the record is replete with dozens or moronic statements by you. I questioned macsak's (blatantly snarkily dismissive, and false) claim and asked him to substantiate it. You being too stupid to understand virtually anything having to do with logic is proved, once again, by you, day after day after day.
If you want to support macsak's claim, show us the evidence that the incident in question was clearly coincidence and not related to receiving the EUA drug. I can hardly wait for your brilliant retort.