For arguments sake lets say you are right (hypotherical). Isnt it irritating when u present info and the person denies it? At least glassser isnt moving goalpost or posting links that he didnt read.

And im not participating in the vaxx vs gene convo because i dont have time currently to dive into it or have previously educated my self on the matter to offer any input.

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Not really.  I get a good laugh every time at his idiocy.  I've come to the sad conclusion that most of these posts will never convince either side they are wrong,  but it serves as a mechanism for people who don't post to learn and/or change opinions.  Lots of these conversations are not a complete yes or no.  Both sides present their evidence etc.  I still can find many of those who agree with my points of view outside this forum(scientists etc) , so just because you believe I am wrong doesn't make it so.  The times I have actually been wrong I have admitted it.  But fetuses are not alive, the election was legit,  covid is real and vaccines are good, etc arguments are still correct in my/others minds.  I go with the consensus most of the time.  My opinion is that, using that method allows the correct result in the majority of the time.  Or if its law related, what the courts say.  If 90 out of 100 scientists believe something I will go with them before the 10.  Most times that will lead to the correct answer. 

Vaccination for kids SHOULD still happen unless you can prove they can't spread it.

Its one thing to not listen to other people, but you dont even listen to yourself.

if people who get the shot can still spread the disease that is more proof it is NOT a VACCINE

Its one thing to not listen to other people, but you dont even listen to yourself.

if people who get the shot can still spread the disease that is more proof it is NOT a VACCINE

What?   If kids don't get the shot,  get covid, obviously they can spread it.   I got the flu vaccine, can still get the flu.  It's just most of the time I won't.  You know science.   You don't even understand how vaccines work.  Explains alot of your postings.  Keep posting your idiocy its entertaining,  hope the lurkers get a free laugh. 

Influenza viri are a country mile from Corona viri.  a Flu vs. a Cold. Ever once hear of a cure for the common cold? Ever get a Cold 'vaccine'?

Influenza viri are a country mile from Corona viri.  a Flu vs. a Cold. Ever once hear of a cure for the common cold? Ever get a Cold 'vaccine'?

Country mile! I haven't heard that used in a longtime.

Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk

This thread is so long this may be a repeat, but if it is, it is worth repeating.



 

Let's look back at OGs contributions to this thread.

'People need to take the 'vaccine' to stop the spread  of the disease.'

Also OG

'Vaccinated children can spread the disease'


Yup, not a vaccine.

Let's look back at OGs contributions to this thread.

'People need to take the 'vaccine' to stop the spread  of the disease.'

Also OG

'Vaccinated children can spread the disease'


Yup, not a vaccine.

Both statements can be true. 

Influenza viri are a country mile from Corona viri.  a Flu vs. a Cold. Ever once hear of a cure for the common cold? Ever get a Cold 'vaccine'?

Too many mutations that's why we don't have a common cold vaccine, if I remember correctly.  But they are all viruses in the end.

Vaccination for kids SHOULD still happen unless you can prove they can't spread it.

as always, you left out "in my opinion"...

Too many mutations that's why we don't have a common cold vaccine, if I remember correctly.  But they are all viruses in the end.

Every 2nd day they announce a new strain of COVID-19,  a mutation.

So thanks for adding another point to the Not a Vaccine column

SNIP

Isnt it irritating when u present info and the person denies it?

No. . .

CDC tech report page 17. 2/3 of delta deaths are vaxxed. Half of that are fully vaxxed.

Inb4 # would have been higher without vaxx.



Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

CDC tech report page 17. 2/3 of delta deaths are vaxxed. Half of that are fully vaxxed.

Inb4 # would have been higher without vaxx.



Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

If you go read up on the Spanish Flu outbreak the parallels are uncanny. Politicians pushed for 80% vaxx, not for science, but because they were sure it would score them reelection points. As mutations evolved they became more contagious and less lethal (we are seeing this now w/ COVID-19) which if you think about it makes sense. Increasing lethality would severely shrink the number of hosts and slow the spread way down (see Ebola). Eventually it petered out, not from vaccines (IIRC they didn't even come close to 30% of pop) but just by the  nature of viral evolution mechanism.

If you go read up on the Spanish Flu outbreak the parallels are uncanny. Politicians pushed for 80% vaxx, not for science, but because they were sure it would score them reelection points. As mutations evolved they became more contagious and less lethal (we are seeing this now w/ COVID-19) which if you think about it makes sense. Increasing lethality would severely shrink the number of hosts and slow the spread way down (see Ebola). Eventually it petered out, not from vaccines (IIRC they didn't even come close to 30% of pop) but just by the  nature of viral evolution mechanism.

disease causing virii always get weaker as they mutate...

disease causing virii always get weaker as they mutate...

Not Always

disease causing virii always get weaker as they mutate...

Of course or every yearly flu would eventually become a global extinction event.

So the 'more, more, longer, longer' is all theater for gullible people with 3.7 gpas from prestigious private schools.

as always, you left out "in my opinion"...

Nevermind receptors or other things lidat. . .

Vaccination for kids SHOULD still happen unless you can prove they can't spread it.

You or the government don't have PARENTAL authority. over anyone else's children.