No, you are pointing out how bribing a government official isn't illegal due to your lack of agreeing with my statement of it.

Non-sequitur. Me not saying "I agree" isn't the same as saying "I disagree"

I posted it more than once and you didn't agree, but instead shifting to it being about getting caught.  That's not how laws work and you of all people should know that.

Now you are trying to move goal post. Thanks for playing.

I shifted nothing, the issue is and was always the likelihood of getting caught, specifically how the anonymity of crypto means it would be hard to catch or watch.  You tried to shift the issue pointlessly by saying bribery is illegal. Thanks captain obvious, that's not relevant.

Non-sequitur. Me not saying "I agree" isn't the same as saying "I disagree"

I shifted nothing, the issue is and was always the likelihood of getting caught, specifically how the anonymity of crypto means it would be hard to catch or watch.  You tried to shift the issue pointlessly by saying bribery is illegal. Thanks captain obvious, that's not relevant.

I asked and you chose to deflect so you wont have to admit im correct and youre wrong.  It is relevant.

You obviouslly dont know much about crypto if u think its hard to catch or watch.

I asked and you chose to deflect so you wont have to admit im correct and youre wrong.  It is relevant.

You obviouslly dont know much about crypto if u think its hard to catch or watch.

Wrong and wrong.

Admitting you were right that bribery is illegal wouldn't be admitting I was wrong because I never said or suggested bribery wasn't illegal. You often make true but irrelevant points, just because I don't have you a gold star for saying something true doesn't mean you somehow beat me at anything.

You obviously don't know that much about crypto if you think it isn't hard to catch.

Wrong and wrong.

Admitting you were right that bribery is illegal wouldn't be admitting I was wrong because I never said or suggested bribery wasn't illegal. You often make true but irrelevant points, just because I don't have you a gold star for saying something true doesn't mean you somehow beat me at anything.

You obviously don't know that much about crypto if you think it isn't hard to catch.

I asked you about it and you chose to reply with a non-answer.  AKA:"I won't answer that he's right because then my argument fall apart and it would be wrong".  Thanks for playing.

Crypto can vary from easy to hard to "catch" things.  You posted on how it's hard to catch : "specifically how the anonymity of crypto means it would be hard to catch or watch". Digital trails exist. Thanks for confirming you don't know much about crypto.

Now compare this to cash that has no digital trail of when handed from hand to hand. 

I asked you about it and you chose to reply with a non-answer.  AKA:"I won't answer that he's right because then my argument fall apart and it would be wrong".  Thanks for playing.

Wrong.
That sounds like what a rapist says when he rapes a drunk woman. "She didn't say no so it was consent"

Crypto can vary from easy to hard to "catch" things.  You posted on how it's hard to catch : "specifically how the anonymity of crypto means it would be hard to catch or watch". Digital trails exist. Thanks for confirming you don't know much about crypto.

Now compare this to cash that has no digital trail of when handed from hand to hand.

Strawman, I never said digital trails don't exist. Show me how useful those digital trails are with anonymous wallets, crypto washing, crypto tumbling and privacy focused crypto currencies.

Cash in any significant amount has to be laundered to be useful. Only works if you are just going to sit on a pile of money.

Thanks for confirming you don't know much about crypto or cash.

Wrong.
That sounds like what a rapist says when he rapes a drunk woman. "She didn't say no so it was consent"


Strawman, I never said digital trails don't exist. Show me how useful those digital trails are with anonymous wallets, crypto washing, crypto tumbling and privacy focused crypto currencies.

Cash in any significant amount has to be laundered to be useful. Only works if you are just going to sit on a pile of money.

Thanks for confirming you don't know much about crypto or cash.

Wow, what an unrelated example to use.  You are in a dark place today man. And it's also wrong as the definition of "consent" per google is : "permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.".  So even your dark example is wrong as a no doesn't mean yes.  I hope you don't think of things in this manner since you're the one who used this bad and dark example.

Please show me where I stated you said digital trails don't exist.  You are once again imaging things.

Your thing about laundering just solved the next step in the cash process.  Even the crypto process would have to do this and oops, there's that pesky digital trail that you think I said that you said it doesn't exist.

Thanks for confirming you still don't know much about crypto.

You seem to be going off the reservation today.  I suggest you take a step back and regroup.  You seem to be better when you're fresh.

I’ve been testing different route setups, and the thing that moved the needle for me was using AI routing for professional day traders because it adjusts fills and latency on the fly instead of sticking to a fixed sequence. Being able to tweak routes while still tapping into lit exchanges, dark pools, and broker paths like Barclays LX or Citadel made my fills a lot smoother without changing my core strategy.