Post by: Rocky on May 30, 2021, 10:13:55 AM
Racism refers to ANY race
Feel free to add how many of each you know and who they are racist towards or remain anonymous.
Post by: powerlessbump on May 30, 2021, 01:56:00 PM
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on May 30, 2021, 02:20:42 PM
I have known many people who hold misconceptions/stereotypes or make prejudicial assessments of others of different races, but that's not racism. That's bigotry and prejudice.
Archie Bunker (a fictional but famous TV character) was a bigot who believed stereotypes of every race, ethnicity and sexual orientation. Whether it was Blacks, Irish, Pollocks, Jews, or Gays, he assumed everyone in each group behaved and thought similarly. I don't remember him ever espousing a belief that Whites were superior or any other race was inferior.
So, I've known many Archie Bunkers, but no Adolf Hitlers.
Post by: Glasser on May 30, 2021, 02:40:24 PM
I for one love our Rampantly Racist Paradise. We are so good at it we can be 4 kinds of racist to a person who has 4 different ethnic extractions. Try and top that Mainland Haoles!
Post by: hvybarrels on May 30, 2021, 03:40:25 PM
Post by: oldfart on May 30, 2021, 05:14:17 PM
Post by: changemyoil66 on May 30, 2021, 09:37:12 PM
I'm not racist. I hate everybody equally. ;DSo does DI Hartman.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Post by: myanmar1 on May 30, 2021, 10:10:30 PM
Grew up with this mentality, think this still applies today.
Post by: QUIETShooter on May 30, 2021, 10:29:53 PM
Post by: Jl808 on May 31, 2021, 08:05:44 AM
Post by: ren on May 31, 2021, 08:47:35 AM
Post by: oldfart on May 31, 2021, 08:50:18 AM
You forgot the option for "everyone I know is a racist".===============
Racism is natural instinct
It's not even a human natural instinct.
It's a basic animal instinct to favor, help, and promote your own species.
You can't fool mother nature.
You don't see crocodiles helping zebras get across the river.
Post by: Kuleana on May 31, 2021, 09:19:57 AM
Everyone I know who is white is racist -- by Critical Race Theory definition.I am so glad you have made that distinction Flapp.
I have known many people who hold misconceptions/stereotypes or make prejudicial assessments of others of different races, but that's not racism. That's bigotry and prejudice.
Archie Bunker (a fictional but famous TV character) was a bigot who believed stereotypes of every race, ethnicity and sexual orientation. Whether it was Blacks, Irish, Pollocks, Jews, or Gays, he assumed everyone in each group behaved and thought similarly. I don't remember him ever espousing a belief that Whites were superior or any other race was inferior.
So, I've known many Archie Bunkers, but no Adolf Hitlers.
The current problem, with Critical Race Theory, is the fanatics in-support and against that theory are the ones unfortunately controlling the narrative, thereby, fostering more race hatred, on both sides, of the spectrum. Is there evidence to support the presence, of systemic or institutionalized racism, in certain public and private institutions, in the US empire today? Yes, there is evidence.
For the fanatics supporting Critical Race Theory, however, that does not mean all White people are bad; employ such prejudice and bigoted behaviors, outside their home or in the workplace; and should be mercilessly ostracized.
For the fanatics against Critical Race Theory, unless you live isolated, on a rural homestead, it would be very disingenuous to claim all White people do not have prejudice or practice bigotry, to other races, or support the idea that certain professions, upper management, political power, etc. should be a White's only club.
As to why, the power okole, who happens to be predominately White, seems oblivious to this issue; the reason is obvious. The oligarchs, of the US empire, loves distraction and division, as race is the only domestic issue, other than garnering hatred to China and Russia, that they can use to prevent American patriots, from focusing their anger and energies against them.
Consider that while taking the above poll.
Post by: groveler on May 31, 2021, 09:38:09 AM
that is useless. That being said, there are cultures I don't like.
I don't like Democrats.
I don't like Socialists, Communists, or Globalists.
I don't like Eco-nuts.
See, I'm not a racist, I'm just a man that wants to be free
and live as I choose.
Post by: ren on May 31, 2021, 10:11:58 AM
https://twitter.com/pine_tree_riots/status/1398812218477608961 (https://twitter.com/pine_tree_riots/status/1398812218477608961)
Post by: VegasGunner on May 31, 2021, 10:41:20 AM
Politicians like to use racism to keep us divided and gain support for themselves. It keeps them in power and makes the rich. I like Morgan Freemans response when asked how to stop the spread of racism, he said "Stop talking about it!"
I may be Japanese by ethnicity but my nationality is American. I believe in and support our Constitution. I made an oath to defend it when I joined the military and will continue to do so until the day I die.
As far as the poll? Yes I'm racist but racist "Hawaiian style"
Post by: Glasser on May 31, 2021, 11:01:40 AM
The communist wikipedia editors try SO HARD to downplay what is put forth in that book. Its make them angry on an OG level.
Post by: stangzilla on May 31, 2021, 11:24:37 AM
https://youtu.be/KwwD0MwQo5w
Post by: stangzilla on May 31, 2021, 11:25:47 AM
Post by: stangzilla on May 31, 2021, 11:31:45 AM
https://youtu.be/RitnM9n0jTY
Post by: Glasser on May 31, 2021, 11:50:16 AM
Archie Bunker on gun control
https://youtu.be/KwwD0MwQo5w
I wanted to get some context as to the time period when this was being discussed. The quick skim of crime statistic data showed that there was a massive surge in gun crime in the early 70s to the 80s was almost exclusively in big cities. Surprise those states and cities all had Democrat Governors and Mayors at the time. The rise was directly tied to street gang violence and organized crime
Also, gun crime rates have dropped massively beginning in the 90s (and are still dropping even if the TV pretends its not). I am guessing the 70s-80s Cocaine Cowboy wars probably blew stats thru the roof for a dozen plus years.
Am I racist for pointing out that the gangs they mention as creating all the gun violence werent White?
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on May 31, 2021, 12:19:28 PM
I wanted to get some context as to the time period when this was being discussed. The quick skim of crime statistic data showed that there was a massive surge in gun crime in the early 70s to the 80s was almost exclusively in big cities. Surprise those states and cities all had Democrat Governors and Mayors at the time. The rise was directly tied to street gang violence and organized crime
Also, gun crime rates have dropped massively beginning in the 90s (and are still dropping even if the TV pretends its not). I am guessing the 70s-80s Cocaine Cowboy wars probably blew stats thru the roof for a dozen plus years.
Am I racist for pointing out that the gangs they mention as creating all the gun violence werent White?
The 70s and early 80s also experienced one of the worst recessions in US history. Double-digit inflation, 20%+ consumer loans, gas prices out the roof, gas shortages, foreclosures, businesses going under, wide scale unemployment, and a national drug problem that was killing people in the tens of thousands per year in the late 1970s.
Illegal drug markets create a long list of associated crimes and problems. It's why the war of drugs started in the 1980s. The people wanted something done, and that was the President's answer at the time. Here's a very thorough exploration of what might be the reasons and causes of the 1980s "illegal drug panic":
Quote
The late 1980s witnessed a drug "panic," "crisis," or "scare" (Levine and Reinarman, 1988, 1987; Reinarmanhttps://druglibrary.org/special/goode/drugpanic.htm
and Levine, 1989; Goode, 1990). Public concern about drug use, although it had been building throughout the
1980s, fairly exploded late in 1985 and early in 1986. And the drug that was the special target of public concern
was cocaine, more specifically, crack, a cocaine derivative. Drug use generally came to be seen as a—some say
the—social problem of the decade. Drug use, abuse, and misuse emerged into the limelight as perhaps never
before. It is possible that in no other decade has the issue of drugs occupied such a huge and troubling space
in the public consciousness. And it is possible that no specific drug has dominated center stage in this concern
as crack cocaine did between 1986 and, roughly, late 1989 to early 1990.
Post by: Kuleana on May 31, 2021, 12:25:15 PM
Am I racist for pointing out that the gangs they mention as creating all the gun violence werent White?A lot depends on what definition is being used and the context that statement was being made.
For me, racism is a system that allows any racial group that’s already in power to retain power; hence, a racist person is someone, who advocates and actively participates, in the creation and maintenance, of that hierarchy.
Based on the definition I use, your statement is not at all racist, as it has nothing to do, with perpetuating a particular racial power structure. However, if your next statement was to the effect of "Non-white people should not be allowed to own guns, due to the preponderance, of gun-related crimes, in their communities". That would be a racist statement, as it would be protecting the right (power) to own guns, only to one particular race.
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on May 31, 2021, 12:33:23 PM
A lot depends on what definition is being used and the context that statement was being made.
For me, racism is a system that allows any racial group that’s already in power to retain power; hence, a racist person is someone, who advocates and actively participates in the creation and maintenance, of that hierarchy.
Based on the definition I use, your statement is not at all racist, as it has nothing to do, with perpetuating a particular racial power structure. However, if your next statement was to the effect of "Non-white people should not be allowed to own guns, due to the preponderance, of gun-related crimes, in their communities". That would be a racist statement, as it would be protecting the right (power) to own guns, only to one particular race.
Unfortunately, the logic you say we should not use regarding race and gun ownership is exactly the logic being used for other groups.
Not all felons commit crimes with guns (or violent crimes at all), yet all felons are prohibited from owning guns.
Same is true of domestic abusers, drug abusers, drunk drivers, people seeking treatment or counseling for emotional health issues, etc.
Simply belonging to a "class" determined to be untrustworthy with guns will have their civil right to own a gun violated. Obama included Social Security recipients who have someone else managing their money as a prohibited class, and the courts shot that down. Once they started defining classes of people for their policies, it was just a matter of including more and more classes without having to consider an individual's fitness to own guns.
Post by: groveler on May 31, 2021, 12:34:12 PM
The 70s and early 80s also experienced one of the worst recessions in US history. Double-digit inflation, 20%+ consumer loans, gas prices out the roof, gas shortages, foreclosures, businesses going under, wide scale unemployment, and a national drug problem that was killing people in the hundreds of thousands per year.I've made comments about my prejudice against certain cultures.
Illegal drug markets create a long list of associated crimes and problems. It's why the war of drugs started in the 1980s. The people wanted something done, and that was the President's answer at the time. Here's a very thorough exploration of what might be the reasons and causes of the 1980s "illegal drug panic":
https://druglibrary.org/special/goode/drugpanic.htm
I also think the theory of "natural selection" is very compelling.
Most all drugs should be legal.
Not my job to decide the fate, of another adult hominoid.
If they Fuk up and die there is no direct personal cost to
me.
At a Macro level, eventually the stupid will die off.
:worship:
Post by: Kuleana on May 31, 2021, 12:51:09 PM
Unfortunately, the logic you say we should not use regarding race and gun ownership is exactly the logic being used for other groups.Excellent and unfortunate point, as you mentioned Flapp.
Not all felons commit crimes with guns (or violent crimes at all), yet all felons are prohibited from owning guns.
Same is true of domestic abusers, drug abusers, drunk drivers, people seeking treatment or counseling for emotional health issues, etc.
Simply belonging to a "class" determined to be untrustworthy with guns will have their civil right to own a gun violated. Obama included Social Security recipients who have someone else managing their money as a prohibited class, and the courts shot that down. Once they started defining classes of people for their policies, it was just a matter of including more and more classes without having to consider an individual's fitness to own guns.
It is tragic that the utilization of groups or classes in laws have translated to other areas, particularly in gun ownership, to truly unfair and/or unintended effect. However, let's not forget the motives behind gun control is in the interest, of the power okole. Nevertheless, reckless lumping of people into sometimes politically motivated arbitrary classes, in order to favor another particular class, is definitely another derivative form of racism, as well.
The way things are going, I would not be surprised, if the power okole influence legislation that requires a certain level of income, which only the wealthy possess, as a legal requirement to vote, own guns, or run for political office.
Post by: Glasser on May 31, 2021, 12:56:27 PM
A lot depends on what definition is being used and the context that statement was being made.
For me, racism is a system that allows any racial group that’s already in power to retain power; hence, a racist person is someone, who advocates and actively participates, in the creation and maintenance, of that hierarchy.
Based on the definition I use, your statement is not at all racist, as it has nothing to do, with perpetuating a particular racial power structure. However, if your next statement was to the effect of "Non-white people should not be allowed to own guns, due to the preponderance, of gun-related crimes, in their communities". That would be a racist statement, as it would be protecting the right (power) to own guns, only to one particular race.
Sorry my 'Am I racist?' comment was a rhetorical question. Someone calling you that now days is just hilarious and only used by crybabies idiots who never in their lifetime experienced actual Racism, well... unless they applied for a job or enrollment in a university and didnt get it because of diversity quotas.
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on May 31, 2021, 01:27:53 PM
Excellent and unfortunate point, as you mentioned Flapp.
It is tragic that the utilization of groups or classes in laws have translated to other areas, particularly in gun ownership, to truly unfair and/or unintended effect. However, let's not forget the motives behind gun control is in the interest, of the power okole. Nevertheless, reckless lumping of people into sometimes politically motivated arbitrary classes, in order to favor another particular class, is definitely another derivative form of racism, as well.
The way things are going, I would not be surprised, if the power okole influence legislation that requires a certain level of income, which only the wealthy possess, as a legal requirement to vote, own guns, or run for political office.
That was already attempted when the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed in part to ban Saturday Night Specials.
The rationale was that poor people were able to use guns because they could afford the SNS. So, lawmakers intended to make available guns more expensive by banning the cheaper ones. I guess they never heard of "economies of scale," or the secondhand market As demand for the 9mm lines increased, the prices fell. Dealers could make the same profit by selling more guns for lower prices. Get rid of one option, another fills that void.
Trying to price something out of the hands of the lower class normally doesn't usually work in the US. If it exists, anyone can find a way to obtain it. Illegal drugs are a good example. People who are always broke seem to have the money to buy drugs.
Post by: hvybarrels on May 31, 2021, 01:50:51 PM
That was already attempted when the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed in part to ban Saturday Night Specials.
Not to mention the tax stamp system. $200 was a whole lot of money back then.
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on May 31, 2021, 02:37:54 PM
Not to mention the tax stamp system. $200 was a whole lot of money back then.
Yep, a few mobsters ruined full-auto ownership for everybody -- except for criminals!
Happy Valentine's Day!
Post by: Glasser on May 31, 2021, 04:26:51 PM
The speech control is obvious, the end goal was what they were hiding. And a Globalist agenda knows no party lines. It's the wealthy and powerful trying to make a 'new' caste system that will look a like the Middle Ages.
Shut up and work the land peasant so we can tax you so hard you are never able to rise above your station.
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on May 31, 2021, 04:51:41 PM
This resurrected over flogged horse of 60s hippy dippy flashback to RACISM IS EVERYWHERE! is a full court press PsyOp to stifle any objections to Globalists and their super sh*tty anti-freedom Policies. You dont want your countries borders dissolved? You are Racist. You dont want your job shipped over seas to a person who will do it for pennies? You are a Racist! You don't want Chinese Communists buying up everything to Belt & Road all business away from you? You are Racist!
The speech control is obvious, the end goal was what they were hiding. And a Globalist agenda knows no party lines. It's the wealthy and powerful trying to make a 'new' caste system that will look a like the Middle Ages.
Shut up and work the land peasant so we can tax you so hard you are never able to rise above your station.
The party that champions diversity, affirmative action, critical race theory, and racial "equity" (vs. equality) is also the party of slavery, civil rights legislation opposition, Jim Crow laws, and Black Lives Matter.
This same party that is anti-"Old White Male patriarchy" just put the oldest, whitest male ever in the White House.
It's like dealing with a 3 year old whose favorite food yesterday was mashed potatoes, and today can't stand them -- and you made extra because it's THEIR FAVORITE.
I've held the opinion for over 40 years that there just isn't any pleasing the Democrats/Leftists/Socialists/Liberals/Progressives. You give them what they ask for, and they demand something else. Never happy -- always bitter -- always a victim.
Post by: omnigun on June 01, 2021, 06:07:06 AM
The party that champions diversity, affirmative action, critical race theory, and racial "equity" (vs. equality) is also the party of slavery, civil rights legislation opposition, Jim Crow laws, and Black Lives Matter.
This same party that is anti-"Old White Male patriarchy" just put the oldest, whitest male ever in the White House.
It's like dealing with a 3 year old whose favorite food yesterday was mashed potatoes, and today can't stand them -- and you made extra because it's THEIR FAVORITE.
I've held the opinion for over 40 years that there just isn't any pleasing the Democrats/Leftists/Socialists/Liberals/Progressives. You give them what they ask for, and they demand something else. Never happy -- always bitter -- always a victim.
This isn't a support for the democrats methods, but parties do change Republicans changed for the better Regan and changed again for the worse during Trump. Abortion and religion preaching are newish concepts. You should realize this as you lived for so long....
Post by: macsak on June 01, 2021, 07:27:23 AM
This isn't a support for the democrats methods, but parties do change Republicans changed for the better Regan and changed again for the worse during Trump. Abortion and religion preaching are newish concepts. You should realize this as you lived for so long....
please show definitively that "Abortion and religion preaching are newish concepts."
or did you leave out, "in my opinion"?
Post by: aletheuo137 on June 01, 2021, 07:43:16 AM
please show definitively that "Abortion and religion preaching are newish concepts."Didn't you know that his word is Gospel truth!
or did you leave out, "in my opinion"?
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
Post by: omnigun on June 01, 2021, 08:41:07 AM
please show definitively that "Abortion and religion preaching are newish concepts."
or did you leave out, "in my opinion"?
There's been many research papers on this....
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8274866/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068899005004004
Post by: macsak on June 01, 2021, 11:40:27 AM
There's been many research papers on this....
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8274866/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1354068899005004004
from the late 1970s into the 1990s
22-32 years is "newish"?
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on June 01, 2021, 12:45:57 PM
This isn't a support for the democrats methods, but parties do change Republicans changed for the better Regan and changed again for the worse during Trump. Abortion and religion preaching are newish concepts. You should realize this as you lived for so long....
The Democrats have not changed. They still use race as a means to obtain and maintain political power.
The popular views and legal landscape may change, but their willingness to use any and all available means to divide us for their own gain never stops.
Post by: Glasser on June 01, 2021, 01:04:37 PM
https://christopherrufo.com/montana-against-crt/
https://mobile.twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1397980357702557696
Post by: omnigun on June 01, 2021, 01:17:08 PM
from the late 1970s into the 1990s
22-32 years is "newish"?
Yes, if you look at the amount of time the parties existed...
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on June 01, 2021, 01:28:35 PM
Yes, if you look at the amount of time the parties existed...
You said the parties have "changed". So, can you offer a timeline of those significant changes?
Wouldn't "newish" only apply to the party as it now exists, and not over its entire existence?
Why do you keep moving the goal posts, just to make yourself "not wrong?" (<==rhetorical -- no answer required)
Post by: macsak on June 01, 2021, 01:36:10 PM
Yes, if you look at the amount of time the parties existed...
goalposts--------->moved
Post by: aletheuo137 on June 01, 2021, 05:11:52 PM
I think he already trashed the goal post!
goalposts--------->moved
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
Post by: omnigun on June 01, 2021, 05:50:39 PM
Post by: hvybarrels on June 01, 2021, 06:30:00 PM
https://youtu.be/LcWdbJ6hH7Y
This one is more relevant than ever.
Post by: 6716J on June 02, 2021, 02:26:15 PM
Post by: 6716J on June 02, 2021, 02:29:10 PM
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on June 02, 2021, 02:44:12 PM
Newish implies the lifetime of something.... if you live for 100 years vs 500 newish implies two different time periods....
LOL! Because "you say so?"
Quote
newish adjective
1. rather new.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/newish
And, since I'm certain you don't know the definition....
Quote
rather adverb
1. in a measure; to a certain extent; somewhat:
rather good.
2. in some degree:
I rather thought you would regret it.
3. more properly or justly; with better reason:
The contrary is rather to be supposed.
4. sooner; more readily or willingly:
to die rather than yield.
5. more properly or correctly speaking; more truly:
He is a painter or, rather, a watercolorist.
6. on the contrary:
It's not generosity, rather self-interest.
7. rather than, instead of:
Tutoring is provided by older students rather than teachers.
Rather than complain, you should try to make changes.
Post by: Glasser on June 02, 2021, 02:55:04 PM
https://www.cc.com/video/63ite2/the-colbert-report-the-word-truthiness
Post by: Flapp_Jackson on June 02, 2021, 03:01:07 PM
If Omnigun had better writers he could be a washed up comedian
https://www.cc.com/video/63ite2/the-colbert-report-the-word-truthiness
Sorry. I choose to never give one second of my life to the person in that video. Waste of space, even in the digital space.
:geekdanc: :shaka:
Post by: Glasser on June 02, 2021, 03:26:00 PM
Sorry. I choose to never give one second of my life to the person in that video. Waste of space, even in the digital space.
:geekdanc: :shaka:
It's an old bit he did. VERY applicable to any conversation where Dumb Kid pipes in. He'd watch it and thinks it's the news.
Post by: Heavies on June 02, 2021, 04:58:11 PM
Post by: hvybarrels on June 02, 2021, 06:02:06 PM
It's an old bit he did. VERY applicable to any conversation where Dumb Kid pipes in. He'd watch it and thinks it's the news.
He used to be funny, I mean not super funny but at least it was entertaining. Watching clips of him lately is about as fun as drinking dirty mop water.
Post by: Glasser on June 03, 2021, 07:36:50 AM
I know a lot of racist people, funny thing is they are all lefties.
this sure as hell sounds Racist to me.
JUST IN - Biden to boost vaccinations at "hubs of activity and information for black and brown communities," citing local beauty shops, barbershop & stylists.
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1400160502504951810
Only way it could be more blatant is if he said they were gonna vaccinate black folks in Popeye's parking lots.
Post by: QUIETShooter on June 03, 2021, 08:16:46 AM
Racism has been taken totally out of context recently. Mostly for political aspirations. It has been dumbed down to the point where everything we say, do, or believe is somehow racist.
And those who have suffered the most from racism are predominantly responsible for this, throwing out common sense and rationality out the window, replacing it with greed, hate, and anger.
Post by: Rocky on June 03, 2021, 09:38:18 AM
A lot depends on what definition is being used and the context that statement was being made.
For me, racism is a system that allows any racial group that’s already in power to retain power; hence, a racist person is someone, who advocates and actively participates, in the creation and maintenance, of that hierarchy.
Based on your definition, POC would be the racist as they are the "racial group that’s already in power " is POC "who advocates and actively participates, in the creation and maintenance, of that hierarchy."
Post by: Rocky on June 03, 2021, 09:39:30 AM
Archie Bunker on gun control
https://youtu.be/KwwD0MwQo5w
Also liked his "opinion" on airline hijackings that were happening at that time.
Post by: Rocky on June 03, 2021, 09:42:39 AM
Archie Bunker on gun control
https://youtu.be/KwwD0MwQo5w
Also liked his "opinion" on airline hijackings that were happening at that time.
To paraphrase...
"Just give everyone a gun when they get on the plane.
Who's gonna let someone hijack the plane and stop them from getting to their destination?"
Brilliant. :geekdanc:
Post by: Kuleana on June 03, 2021, 09:43:31 AM
I would say we all are racists. Whether we know it or not. Whether we want to or not.Fair statement, but it depends on what definition of racism is being used. I would 100% agree that human beings are inherently prejudiced and often consciously or subconsciously exhibit bigoted behaviors.
Racism has been taken totally out of context recently. Mostly for political aspirations. It has been dumbed down to the point where everything we say, do, or believe is somehow racist.Totally agree. It is not that the politicians created racism and/or hate. It was more they took what was already present, fanned things up, in order to achieve their agendas.
And those who have suffered the most from racism are predominantly responsible for this, throwing out common sense and rationality out the window, replacing it with greed, hate, and anger.I have to disagree with this.
No common person wakes-up, in the morning, to purposely hate any particular group or race, without reason. As stated above, politicians are notoriously guilty, of exacerbating racism and hate, but they are not the reason racism and hate exists. There must have been some cause and effect at-play, which have given rise to the racism and hate exhibited. Fabricated prejudice and bigotry do not last that long, as rational people really do not have time or energy in hating something that is based on nonsense. There must be an underlying reason that will convince a person, ethnicity, or race to hate another group that is different from themselves.
Consequently, one of the most important lessons in history comes to mind: no justice, no peace.
Post by: Rocky on June 03, 2021, 09:48:31 AM
That was already attempted when the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed in part to ban Saturday Night Specials.Totally racist law.
The rationale was that poor people were able to use guns because they could afford the SNS.
Try looking up the FULL name of the "(N)SNS"
Post by: Kuleana on June 03, 2021, 09:50:55 AM
Based on your definition, POC would be the racist as they are the "racial group that’s already in power " is POC "who advocates and actively participates, in the creation and maintenance, of that hierarchy."Just curious, what metric are you using to claim POC are in power and what hierarchy are you referring that they are in-control?
Post by: Rocky on June 03, 2021, 10:01:05 AM
Newish implies the lifetime of something.... if you live for 100 years vs 500 newish implies two different time periods....
So your life experience to life is "newish" compared to those who have lived and experienced 2x and 3x the "time period" that you have.
We're still around because of our "experience" and judgement because of it and getting old "ain't for pussies". :grrr:
:closed:
:stopjack:
Post by: Glasser on June 04, 2021, 02:53:02 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E3DjyhlWYAAlRho?format=jpg&name=medium)
Post by: aletheuo137 on June 04, 2021, 03:15:27 PM
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
Post by: Glasser on June 04, 2021, 03:40:41 PM
She is a picture of mental health
'They make my blood boil': NYC psychiatrist tells woke Yale University panel she fantasizes about shooting white people in the head
Dr Aruna Khilanani, who is a psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, delivered the talk virtually to Yale University medical students and faculty back in April
She was invited by Yale School of Medicine's Child Study Center
Audio of the 50-minute talk was published on journalist Bari Weiss' Substack blog on Friday
She made a series of stunning comments during her talk that was largely based on the psychology behind 'whiteness'
Khilanani said she had fantasized about 'unloading a revolver into the head of any white person' who got in her way
She went on to say that white people feel they are being bullied when people of color bring up race
At various other points, she described white people as being 'out of their minds' and said that they make her 'blood boil'
Post by: Rocky on June 04, 2021, 03:53:03 PM
Just curious, what metric are you using to claim POC are in power and what hierarchy are you referring that they are in-control?
Fair question :thumbsup:
"POC would be the racist as they are the "racial group that’s already in power"
BLM,,
"who advocates and actively participates, in the creation and maintenance, of "
Again BLM and though majority of Antifa are not POC, they back the that hierarchy."
"that hierarch y."
DNC, the left, and their ilk