What was used and how was used.  Then trying to blame the Bushy.  Was it in the trunk or was the shotgun?

I'm almost 99% positive that is a semi-auto shotgun. Whatever it was, it had a side charging handle and a pretty big cartridge get ejected from it.

Have you guys seen this summary of the evidence?



30 minutes long but a good watch if you're interested in the subject.

Excuse me... I have to go check on the stock prices of tin foil...

question everything

So ive been watching more and more YouTube videos of how "suppossed parents" and witnesses and victims are really actors and have been on CNN and other news reports.  Also, that Sandy Hook has been used in the past for crisis drills for the same mass murder scenario.  The forensic doctor interview was a joke, and the whole event was a staged crisis event to get the publics reaction and the government to bring up the the legal arms issue.  Even Victoria Soto a suppossed teacher who died sacrificing herself to protect her students had a facebook page claiming here dead with a RIP tribute to her before the Sandy Hook event.  Her FB site has been since deactivated.

How will Obama and the US government answer to the validity of Sandy Hook and still pursue getting weapons banned or restricted?  Its a disgrace our govt for the people and by the people stooped so low to bring up an argument to restrict and/or ban our 2nd amendment right.

Your tinfoil hat / underwear is coming off!   This is the most fucked up thing I've read today!!!  I know somebody through a friend who actually lost their daughter in this horrible tragedy!!!  Those were real bodies and real people!!!

The fact that some crazy lunatic killed his own mother and stole her firearms to commit this atrocity is not reason enough to restrict lawful order ship of modern sporting rifles.... The points we should be making about living in a free society, is that we cannot base certain laws on what somebody who's willing to kill their own mother would do!!! 


This is appalling!!!!

If you have a shred of humanity you will not spread this crap!!!

Been thinking about this... some of the stuff presented in this video especially about the Parker dad and the photos of Emily Parker just didn't make sense.

Here's another simple and possible explanation...

Could there just have been fake actors that acted out the news reels we saw afterwards to shape public perception after the tragedy happened? 

Why?  I don't know... to coverup some details of the actual incident?  News sensationalizing?  Fitting a gun ban agenda?  not sure... too many conflicting and suppressed information.

Folks. Better now to concentrate on the hard battles we have ahead of us. Nothing right now will come of any conspiracy theories. It is all just a diversion to keep the eye off of the real issues we face right now. Concentrate all energies on fighting the insane laws that are being put forth. After those battles are won we can call for whatever investigations are warrented. Keep as one!

Now let me get one thing straight.  I'm not saying the shooting didn't happen.  But my argument is, and always has been, the misinformation that the MSM dishes out to the general pubic in order to push the liberal/socialist agenda as far as they can.  Do I believe that the Sandy Hook shooting occurred?  Yes, I do.  It was a horrific event cause by a psychopath with a gun(s).  Do I believe that Sandy Hook was a hoax?  No.  How can a tragedy of that magnitude be faked?  Has the media been truthful with the content they're distributing?  No, I don't believe so.  In fact, my opinion is that there are blatant lies being spread in order to sway public opinion fueled off of emotions spurred by the event.  What makes the situation worse and helps fuel the conspiracy fire is that the government shows no interest in putting out those fires either.  I just wish that there was more truth in reporting.  It's frustrating when it's difficult to trust what's considered reputable news sources.

Sorry to add to the conspiracy theories.  Take a look at this article, watch the videos and compare the photographs.

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/19/sandy-hook-smoking-gun-revealed-factions-of-government-law-enforcement-and-mainstream-media-including-anderson-cooper-engaged-in-treason-against-the-united-states-and-its-citizens/

So who's right?  Who's wrong?  What do we believe and what do we brush off as wacko?  Do we take everything from CNN, FOX, NBC at face value and give them the benefit of the doubt?  Or do we listen to fringe websites like this and believe the total opposite?  How do we come to an honest conclusion, not just on Sandy Hook, but on everyday, relevant news matters which affect our lives on a daily basis without being inundated with biased information?

Meh. Inconsistent footage isn't necessarily a smoking gun. "Live" footage isn't always live and news outlets run BS footage all the time.

That's one of the reasons you can't really trust footage. So they took a shotgun out of a car. We have only the word of the reporter that the footage in question is the actual car, or anything other than stock footage.

I work in video. :shrug: Stuff gets taken out of context all the time.

edit - I should add that this isn't (necessarily) done to mislead but to present the most visually gripping images.

If you read the biography of William Randolph Hearst, you will see that the news ceased to be the news some time ago. 

Doesnt everybody know that "gullible" isnt in the dictionary?