A wise man once told me, "opinions change over time" and "one's opinions should never be set in stone"...
That's fine for those who are not totally familiar with a subject or who base their opinions on fluid and difficult to understand facts.
We are discussing a man who ran on a platform comprised of assurances, promises, and idealistic rhetoric. Are you saying it's not a problem if the man you voted for BECAUSE of his promises and assurances decides to do a 180 from what he told you he would do?
That's not a wise man. That's a bait-and-switch salesman.
If he had an erroneous opinion based on incorrect (or worse, no) facts,
OR if he is just telling you what he thinks you want to hear because it's opposite from what Bush did (going after the anti-Bush crowd),
then he is NOT the person he portrayed himself to be during the campaign.
Basically, you're okay with being lied to as long as the man has a reason for changing his mind ...
AFTER he already got what he wanted from you ... your vote!
Just seeing if I read you right.