Quote from: Tom_G on Today at 02:52:33 PM
So... an act of civil disobedience? Can we get 500 people to show up at the capitol, all carrying openly? "Dare" the government to turn so many upstanding citizens into felons?
Quote from: xer 21 on Today at 04:48:21 PM
they would do it in a heartbeat.
Yeah, this isn't Washington state where open carry is legal and the protest was "illegally" "transferring" (aka "handing") firearms from one person to another without the benefit of a background check for each "transfer" (I-594). Law enforcement there did nothing. OFWGs getting arrested for illegally carrying doesn't have the "sympathy factor" (especially in Hawaii) as did the images of black children being attacked by police dogs for trying to go to school. The general public here doesn't care about our issue, and likely wouldn't be moved to do anything if dozens or hundreds of people were arrested (which likely would never happen in the first place as people having jobs and families to feed couldn't afford to risk it all for a symbolic gesture most likely having no meaningful consequent movement to restore our rights).
Given this expected decision for en banc (aka "overturn"), the best option for Hawaii residents wanting to exercise the full range of their Second Amendment rights is to move.
Once Peruta is vacated, Baker will be null and void, though the appeal to SCOTUS will keep things in limbo (or status quo: no CCW in Hawaii) for a few more years. Maybe
Palmer will be granted cert by SCOTUS and we'll get a clear ruling allowing us to "bear arms" for self-defense. Or not. "Not" seems most likely at this point given the refusal of cert by SCOTUS of all the previous CCW cases in the past two years.
