I commented on Takai's "gun violence" positions a few months ago on another thread. In case people don't want to take the time to navigate his website to see his ignorant and/or misleading and/or deceitful statements, here is the full content of the "gun control" section of his website (my bold/italic empahsis):
Gun Violence Prevention
“I have a military background – that is why I don’t understand why individuals need military grade weapons in their homes.”
I believe citizens should be allowed to own guns for sport – guns without military applications like automatic firing capability. No one needs an Uzi to puncture paper targets or to bring down a pig during hunting season. These weapons are for killing and should be banned.
I also believe that guns should be stored with mandatory trigger locks, that there should be mandatory training requirements, waiting periods for purchasing guns and universal background checks so that people with mental health or violent criminal records cannot legally buy a gun.
* * * * * *
Where are civilians getting "military grade weapons"? Unless he means a Beretta 92FS or something. Uzi? Seriously? What an ass. For "sport" only? No self-defense allowed, which would be especially difficult when your firearm is stored with a trigger lock in place. Some greater/more in-depth training requirements than are already in place in Hawaii? A longer waiting period than the two weeks for a handgun already in place in Hawaii? How long for a long gun? "Universal background checks" like in California and Hawaii where no people passing those checks ever commit any crimes using firearms? (See: Isla Vista).
I notice he has "earned" the endorsement of virtually every government employee union known to exist.
Takai vehemently states that the Hobby Lobby decision by SCOTUS was wrong.
Takai: "“I believe business owners shouldn’t be involved in the most personal decision a woman and doctor can make.” added Takai."
But those employers are only involved in any way at all because people like him enact legislation (aka "Obamacare") which forces, under threat of severe penalties, private corporations to "be involved in the most personal decisions a woman or doctor can make". What a hypocrite! Hard to imagine a candidate that could be worse for the causes of individual freedom, liberty, and responsibility, smaller government , and less government intrusion into private lives. Typical Hawaii Democrat. If HRA endorses him... that'll say a lot.