So, medical evaluation for every firearm related purchase?...

.

"It was highly foreseeable to (the) defendants that their potential customers included persons with criminal intent, including persons such as James Holmes," the lawsuit says.

It was also "highly foreseeable" that a gun free zone would be more likely to attract a mass shooter than a theater allowing the carry of concealed firearms.  Where is the theater named in the lawsuit?  What about the people responsible for designating "Gun Free Zones" in the first place?

Statistics and common sense would have foreseen the higher probability a shooting might happen there.  Where were the armed guards to protect the disarmed public at the theater?

As usual, let's blame the tools instead of the criminal.  Access to body armor, ammunition ,and weapons do not cause the problem, nor will restricting access prevent the problem.  Crazy people will find a way to cause harm no matter what we ban and no matter how hard we screen for mental illness. 

Good reading.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312098820/?tag=2ahawaii-20

The Decay of the American Character

Zacktly