You would probably get arrested for a hate crime, and rightly so. The problem with this line of thinking is it encourages armed cowards to seek revenge on innocent people who aren't even remotely affiliated with terrorism, like the white supremacist who shot up a Sikh temple in Wisconsin a couple years ago.
The real threat to this country is the drug armies that have gotten rich of the failed prohibition schemes, armed by guys like Eric Holder, and left pretty much unchecked while our forces drain the national treasure on the next failed Middle East campaign. If the United States is Rome, the drug armies are the Huns, Visigoths, and Vandals. ISIS is the least of our problems.
Hate crime? No. I'm an equal opportunity asshole. I'll take on anybody, regardless of race, religion or nationality if they give me the impression they mean to do me, my family, or my country harm.
I seek no revenge. I seek cessation, or peace, if you prefer. As far as their religion, I don't care what they practice, as long as they keep it to themselves. If Muslims will leave those who don't practice their religion alone, I've no problem with them. Unfortunately they haven't been demonstrating this ability.
We're in agreement on the subject of the supposed "War on Drugs". It has accomplished nothing in regards to drug use and has only served to provide a foot in the door for the government to pry into our lives and place restrictions on our freedoms. Ditto on the Middle East. I understand the arguments for it, containment, keeping oil supplies to the rest of the world steady to prevent economic upheaval. I just never thought that we should get more involved than seeking to get the parties involved to attempt to live together peacefully. When they were busy fighting amongst themselves they didn't seem too concerned with us. After all they've been doing it for thousands of years. I'm all for allowing them to continue unhindered.
Drug "Armies"? Not so much. The criminal element that comprises these supposed "armies" lack the type of command and control it would take to fight a real war. Removing the very real danger of this element is as simple as legalization and regulation of the recreational drug trade. This will undercut the finances of these groups just as the repeal of prohibition cut the ability of the gangsters of the 30's to make money from selling alcohol. While there would be an initial surge in drug use, it would return to the current stable levels that we've had for the last 50 years with the added bonus of the drug users paying taxes.
The comparison between Rome and the U.S. has some very compelling parallels. In both cases it's the leadership, or lack of it, in government that's driving the nation into the ground. Since democrats and republicans are basically different cheeks on the same ass, until we can change people in these parties, or another party willing to take on the actual job of running the nation properly can oust the self serving bastards we have in our government, my hope for any meaningful change is slim.
I agree that ISIS, while a boil on the butt of humanity, is certainly no threat to the security of the U.S. as a nation, but until the government can manage real border security they can cause a great deal of problems resulting in deaths of our citizens. This needs to be stopped by whatever means necessary.
I'm tired of ALL of this shit. I want to get back to the United States of America that I grew up in. I want my kids to be able to grow up there too.