HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2 (Read 15523 times)

macsak

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #20 on: February 04, 2015, 06:58:29 AM »
Due to the time frame of the announcement, I think that we did OK.  Social media disbursement might make it easier to get more response.  Next time, maybe,  try to share more on FB and other accounts, see if we can't get more support.  Only thing is, that may also get the attention of opposition as well.   Thoughts?

my opinion-
the benefits of blasting social media outweigh the possible attention of the antis

Tom_G

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #21 on: February 04, 2015, 08:17:49 AM »
Due to the time frame of the announcement, I think that we did OK.  Social media disbursement might make it easier to get more response.  Next time, maybe,  try to share more on FB and other accounts, see if we can't get more support.  Only thing is, that may also get the attention of opposition as well.   Thoughts?

As long as those calls are as clear and concise as this one, absolutely.  Spread the word by all possible vehicles. 
The difference between theory and reality is that, in theory, there is no difference between theory and reality.

Jl808

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #22 on: February 05, 2015, 06:20:02 AM »
Great job folks on opposing SB462. I just reviewed all the submitted testimony and saw all but 1 submission opposed it. Looks like Domestic Violence Action Center is the only supporter (it's not exactly clear). In their letter they expect SWAT to serve restraining orders to firearm owners. How messed up is that?

We gotta do better though, Only 67 pages of testimony (And it looks like it repeats).

I believe there were a lot of late submitters after the 1pm deadline.

This bill is deferred by committee to next week Tuesday 2/10/15 1:15PM in conference room 229.  Please submit testimony BEFORE Monday 2/9/2015 1pm if you haven't done so.

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=462&year=2015


I think, therefore I am armed.
NRA Life Patron member, HRA Life member, HiFiCo Life Member, HDF member

The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.

Heavies

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #23 on: February 05, 2015, 06:32:22 AM »
I forget.  Will we need to re-submit testimony?

Jdelacruz

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2015, 06:58:35 AM »
I'm re-submitting just in case.

Heavies

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2015, 09:21:15 AM »
Done

punaperson

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2015, 10:13:23 AM »
I forget.  Will we need to re-submit testimony?
Here is the committee agenda for the 2/10/15 meeting:

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2015/hearingnotices/HEARING_PSM_02-10-15_DEFER_.HTM

They'll be deciding on SB462 and SB473. After the listing of the two measures to be decided:

"No testimony will be accepted."

macsak

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #27 on: February 05, 2015, 04:29:41 PM »
Here is the committee agenda for the 2/10/15 meeting:

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2015/hearingnotices/HEARING_PSM_02-10-15_DEFER_.HTM

They'll be deciding on SB462 and SB473. After the listing of the two measures to be decided:

"No testimony will be accepted."

confirmed by dr max cooper
"No testimony taken at decision."

punaperson

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2015, 10:18:12 PM »
confirmed by dr max cooper
"No testimony taken at decision."
Considering that the submitted testimony was approximately 30 to 1 or 2 for those two bills, I mistakenly read your quote as "No testimony taken seriously at decision."

That couldn't be right! Could it?

Heavies

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #29 on: February 06, 2015, 04:47:43 AM »
If SB462 passes into law, does this mean HPD will confiscate all your existing firearms if you have been falsely flagged by Kaiser?  This is getting scary out of hand!

also to add, better watch out for bill SB783
« Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 04:54:46 AM by Heavies »

Jdelacruz

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #30 on: February 06, 2015, 05:41:29 AM »
Just read late testimony on SB462. Good news is that HPD opposes it as well.

Q

Re: HRA request for testimony on 3 bills BY 1 PM Monday, Feb. 2
« Reply #31 on: February 06, 2015, 06:13:43 AM »
.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2021, 10:08:16 PM by Q »