Poll

would you get one if you could find one?

Yes
15.8%
Maybe
36.8%
No
42.1%
I never shot a Kel Tec and never will
5.3%
No, cool design but a little overpriced
0%
Total Members Voted
19

Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56 (Read 5340 times)

yurcarmeean

Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« on: March 28, 2015, 09:46:09 AM »
Foldable stock, fireable while folded
made of Kel Tec's proprietary polymer
integrated bipod
integrated rail
under 5 pounds unloaded, around 5 pounds loaded
takes AR magpul PMAGS
can be had for $600-$700


If you stay ready, you don't have to get ready.

xer 21

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2015, 06:39:03 PM »
its a cool design, but i probably wouldnt buy one atm, i already have a rifle in that caliber.

paka808

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2015, 07:16:59 PM »
I have a couple carbines in that caliber,tavor,ar,scar,1 more wouldn't hurt.it looks like a good hunting rifle.fold it make it compact threw heavy brush, internal bipod for that steady shot.I would get 1.its about the cost of a membership at X-ring.lol.

mauiboi9

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2015, 08:39:06 AM »
Held one. Feels cheaply made like most kel tec stuff, sub2000, pf9s, etc. Think the only kel tecs i held that felt decent was a RFB and KGS.
Im a recoil junkie

ghost_medic

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2015, 10:27:31 AM »
looked at  the su16
ended up with a Yugo under folder variant in 7.62x39 instead
its on the lower end of that price range.
heavier, but proven system, cheaper to feed

intended use was  hunting brush gun, fit the role perfectly
« Last Edit: March 31, 2015, 10:33:11 AM by ghost_medic »

paulb3

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2015, 01:48:54 PM »
I held one too, and it felt flimsy and the handguard bipod thing was strange. 

Kingkeoni

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2015, 02:58:34 PM »
I am not a fan of Keltec firearms.

In my experience, they're flimsy, cheaply built and tend to break a lot.

I've tried to like them.

I've bought Keltec stuff and have never had any luck with them.

I had a PMR-30. It was a jamomatic. Tried to send it to Keltec to repair and they said I had to pay $70 (so much for their B.S. Warranty)

I had a P-11. It had multiple FTF's, FTE's and the extractor broke. (Got rid of that P.O.S. too)

I had a PLR-16. Another jamomatic piece of crap. Three strikes you're out Keltec.

I will never buy anything made by Keltec.
Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.

Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.

mauidog

Re: Kel Tec su-16C in 5.56
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2015, 04:37:49 PM »
I am not a fan of Keltec firearms.

In my experience, they're flimsy, cheaply built and tend to break a lot.

I've tried to like them.

I've bought Keltec stuff and have never had any luck with them.

I had a PMR-30. It was a jamomatic. Tried to send it to Keltec to repair and they said I had to pay $70 (so much for their B.S. Warranty)

I had a P-11. It had multiple FTF's, FTE's and the extractor broke. (Got rid of that P.O.S. too)

I had a PLR-16. Another jamomatic piece of crap. Three strikes you're out Keltec.

I will never buy anything made by Keltec.

So, you're voting, "Maybe?"

 :D
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper