Seems that the popular anti-gun argument is that those people - who are law abiding and went through a background check & what ever process to get the license would shoot in the case of a heated argument.
Does anyone see the stupidity in that?
They label us as a ticking time bomb - that anything can set us off. After all the loops and checks we go through, we are above the average citizen.
Anyways, just venting.
No guns on campus - where in recent events have been attacked several times- by CRIMINALS not abiding the law anyways.
With that same logic let's disarm the rebels in Syria - that's it - since Assad is using guns to take them out    that will solve all our gun violence problems there.

It just shows that the left mind is mentally deficient.  They project their own feeling, the feeling that they cannot control their own anger, onto all gun owners.  They do not trust themselves with handling a firearm, nor do they trust themselves with the responsibility to protect themselves or others.  So they expect you to do as they do; either wait for some other person to save them, or lie down and die with out a fight, truly a mental disorder....  It is the ZERO personal responsibility culture infesting this nation.

It just shows that the left mind is mentally deficient.  They project their own feeling, the feeling that they cannot control their own anger, onto all gun owners.  They do not trust themselves with handling a firearm, nor do they trust themselves with the responsibility to protect themselves or others.  So they expect you to do as they do; either wait for some other person to save them, or lie down and die with out a fight, truly a mental disorder....  It is the ZERO personal responsibility culture infesting this nation.

Many of these Liberal-minded people feel they are morally superior by dying at the hand of a violent criminal as opposed to using violence themselves to defend their own lives.  The same mentality holds in their view of the death penalty -- how can you teach society killing is wrong when the state puts murderers to death?

I read where one Liberal was shot in a robbery.  When asked if he'd consider owning a gun, he said no, that he'd rather die than own a gun that might be used to kill another person!

They imagine themselves to be walking in the footsteps of Gandhi.  Yet, their cause is nowhere as noble.  They are not using passive resistance against government oppression, but rather wishing away the rights of others to choose for themselves the best means of self defense.

This mentality is what criminals and dictators love to see.  People more willing to stand on principle and be victimized than use whatever means necessary to prevent their own oppression.

They are the very definition of sheeple. 

Many of these Liberal-minded people feel they are morally superior by dying at the hand of a violent criminal as opposed to using violence themselves to defend their own lives.  The same mentality holds in their view of the death penalty -- how can you teach society killing is wrong when the state puts murderers to death?

I read where one Liberal was shot in a robbery.  When asked if he'd consider owning a gun, he said no, that he'd rather die than own a gun that might be used to kill another person!

They imagine themselves to be walking in the footsteps of Gandhi.  Yet, their cause is nowhere as noble.  They are not using passive resistance against government oppression, but rather wishing away the rights of others to choose for themselves the best means of self defense.

This mentality is what criminals and dictators love to see.  People more willing to stand on principle and be victimized than use whatever means necessary to prevent their own oppression.

They are the very definition of sheeple.

I like that statement. explains a lot of behavior I observe.

Many of these Liberal-minded people feel they are morally superior by dying at the hand of a violent criminal as opposed to using violence themselves to defend their own lives.  The same mentality holds in their view of the death penalty -- how can you teach society killing is wrong when the state puts murderers to death?

I read where one Liberal was shot in a robbery.  When asked if he'd consider owning a gun, he said no, that he'd rather die than own a gun that might be used to kill another person!

They imagine themselves to be walking in the footsteps of Gandhi.  Yet, their cause is nowhere as noble.  They are not using passive resistance against government oppression, but rather wishing away the rights of others to choose for themselves the best means of self defense.

This mentality is what criminals and dictators love to see.  People more willing to stand on principle and be victimized than use whatever means necessary to prevent their own oppression.

They are the very definition of sheeple.

Baaaaa! I Agreeeeeeee! Good explanation.

They imagine themselves to be walking in the footsteps of Gandhi.  Yet, their cause is nowhere as noble.  They are not using passive resistance against government oppression, but rather wishing away the rights of others to choose for themselves the best means of self defense.

This mentality is what criminals and dictators love to see.  People more willing to stand on principle and be victimized than use whatever means necessary to prevent their own oppression.

They are the very definition of sheeple.

Gandhi wasn't a pacifist. He advocated for violence when he thought it made sense. It's true he did become more oriented towards nonviolence later in life, but he was far from the cheek-turner some romanticise him as.

Gandhi wasn't a pacifist. He advocated for violence when he thought it made sense. It's true he did become more oriented towards nonviolence later in life, but he was far from the cheek-turner some romanticise him as.

Yep.  Reality doesn't matter.  They shape their perception based on half-facts and a Liberal education that is more concerned with image than truth.

Seems that the popular anti-gun argument is that those people - who are law abiding and went through a background check & what ever process to get the license would shoot in the case of a heated argument.
Does anyone see the stupidity in that?

I am sure that such a thing has occurred before but it does not appear to represent any significant number of shootings.

 "to choose for themselves the best means of self defense."

“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well I’m carrying a HUGE DILDO. 

. Just about as effective at protecting us from sociopathic shooters,    but much safer for recreational play,”
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/10/11/3711527/cocks-not-glocks-university-of-texas-students-plan-provocative-protest-of-new-campus-carry-law

“You’re carrying a gun to class? Yeah well I’m carrying a HUGE DILDO. 

. Just about as effective at protecting us from sociopathic shooters,    but much safer for recreational play,”
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2015/10/11/3711527/cocks-not-glocks-university-of-texas-students-plan-provocative-protest-of-new-campus-carry-law

Why do Liberal idiots' minds always turn to sex whenever they should be focusing on a serious problem? 

This is another example of impotent acts by Liberals designed to stimulate emotions and feelings instead of actually coming together to satisfy our need for viable solutions to this problem.

yeah sure...waving a dildo at a deranged criminal armed with a gun will GET YOU KILLED! I bet they would gladly trade their dildo when the crap hits the fan!

Why do Liberal idiots' minds always turn to sex whenever they should be focusing on a serious problem? 

This is another example of impotent acts by Liberals designed to stimulate emotions and feelings instead of actually coming together to satisfy our need for viable solutions to this problem.

They make a turn to sex, but when the woman gets pregnant, they have no problem killing A DEFENSELESS baby.  But DON'T let people carry a firearm and kill an evildoer shooting up a place.....THAT WOULD BE WRONG!