No

I didn't think so either, but I can hope can't I?

99% of the answers to the questions you ask here are available for FREE on the Internet.  Why do the vast majority of your posts involve you asking questions that are easy to answer if you know how to look for it?

I give up.  When you aren't contradicting and arguing, you're asking questions you are too lazy to look up yourself.

Maybe one day you'll be able to contribute more than you take from this forum, but today is not that day.

 

Apparently you don't understand what a rhetorical question is.

The questions I asked were not questions with some easy yes or no answer one can google. They were questions designed to make you think, to provoke a discussion.

Maybe I need to spell things out for you instead? Ok, here is goes. The word terrorism is used by the government, by the media, and by ordinary folks yet there is not always a universal definition. When people discuss a topic but all define it differently you have confusion of the topic. Hence I ask the question so as to hear what people others consider terrorism and provide examples as context to discuss it.

Don't feed the troll.

When this clown started in on all the gun control threads and then claimed he did not know who John Lott was, the troll alarm went off.  A fake is not so hard to spot when they screw up like that.

Knowledge of John Lott proves nothing. Might as well be that you are trolling me.

Apparently you don't understand what a rhetorical question is.

The questions I asked were not questions with some easy yes or no answer one can google. They were questions designed to make you think, to provoke a discussion.

Maybe I need to spell things out for you instead? Ok, here is goes. The word terrorism is used by the government, by the media, and by ordinary folks yet there is not always a universal definition. When people discuss a topic but all define it differently you have confusion of the topic. Hence I ask the question so as to hear what people others consider terrorism and provide examples as context to discuss it.

Rhetorical questions are not effective if your goal is to "provoke discussion."

Maybe you need to look up the definition of "rhetorical question" to see why that's so.   

CNN invented new micro bullets that were used in California....sub millimeter.

CNN invented new micro bullets that were used in California....sub millimeter.

and "ballistics" were found in the home according to the title

Wonder what the "ballistics" would be on a .223mm round...

Wonder what the "ballistics" would be on a .223mm round...

mag capacity would be AWESOME

.

Rhetorical questions are not effective if your goal is to "provoke discussion."

Maybe you need to look up the definition of "rhetorical question" to see why that's so.   

Part of it was rhetorical, and part of it was to illicit discussion.

Regardless, obviously none of it was as you suggested, something I should have just googled.

Wonder what the "ballistics" would be on a .223mm round...

Maybe the same as a tattoo needle.

Enjoy, boys and girls.....

Enjoy, boys and girls.....

Hard to confirm if the multiple shots being fired are from a pistol or rifle at the 40 second mark, but assuming that multiple police officers engaged the vehicle at one time, I'm going to go out on a whim and say it was the terrorists firing their rifle.

That being said, I count more than 20 rounds being fired in less than 10 seconds from the same rifle/pistol.

If that is the case, aren't California rifles restricted to 10 rounds via a fixed magazine, as anything more than 10 rounds is defined as high capacity? If true, that would mean the individuals broke the law and altered a legally firearm to increase it's capacity. And aren't pistol magazines restricted to 10 rounds?

Maybe the didn't get the memo that doing that is illegal.

Perfect example of how firearm laws are working to deter criminals and terrorists from breaking the law in California....I feel so much safer knowing that they listen to the rules just like we do 

why do young dudes hold their cameras straight up and down but hold their pistols sideways?

It was reported that both rifles were illegally modded.

Kinda ironic cause they were both reportedly bought legal in Kommiefornia ....bullet buttons later removed.

Damn criminals. Don't they know it's against the law ?

It was reported that both rifles were illegally modded.

Kinda ironic cause they were both reportedly bought legal in Kommiefornia ....bullet buttons later removed.

Damn criminals. Don't they know it's against the law ?

Wait a minute...you mean to tell me that the terrorists broke the law and removed the bullet buttons that are 100% terrorist/criminal proof, guaranteed to keep everyone safe?!

We obviously need more gun control for people like this to follow!

.

Although I don't find the situation anything to laugh about this video made my day.  Shows the state of the world we live in when someone finds it exciting and needs to record it.

In some instances, I'm glad this is the world we live in.

It's hard to deny what really happened when there is evidence, so people trying to claim that 'gun control works' can get this shoved up their ass, especially when it goes to show that they clearly violated the gun control that should have prevented this in the first place.

.