Is this guy a terrorist or what?! (Read 6980 times)

ren

Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« on: December 15, 2015, 08:29:57 AM »
"Leland Yin Yee (Chinese: 余胤良; pinyin: Yú Yìnliáng, born November 20, 1948) is a former Democratic California State Senator for District 8, which when he was elected, covered parts of San Francisco and the Peninsula. Yee was arrested by the FBI on March 26, 2014 on charges related to public corruption and gun trafficking — specifically buying automatic firearms and shoulder-launched missiles from the Moro Islamic Liberation Front, an Islamist extremist group located in the southern Philippines and attempting to re-sell those weapons to an undercover FBI agent, as well as accepting a $10,000 bribe from an undercover agent in exchange for placing a call to the California Department of Public Health regarding a contract at the organization."

I guess the Kalifornia laws didn't apply to a Cali lawmaker :wacko:
Deeds Not Words

Bota-CS1

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2015, 08:33:35 AM »
.
No one is coming, it’s up to us.

Legislation should never be about depriving law abiding citizens of something, but rather taking those things away from criminals.

justin1098

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2015, 10:12:50 AM »
Yes, Leland bullet button microstamp Yee is a terrorist. He is, also, nominated for the Gun Violence Prevention Honor Roll by the Brady Campaign.
California prefers to punish law-abiding citizens over actual criminals though.

oldfart

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2015, 10:18:02 AM »
He give us pake a bad name
What, Me Worry?

eyeeatingfish

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2015, 05:37:27 PM »
But he bought them from islamic terrorists! He was just doing a gun buyback program to keep radical jihadists from having guns!

Gordyf

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2015, 07:47:42 PM »
Typically lawmakers only make the laws... They don't have to follow them.
There may be exceptions, but they are scarce.
Wish I didn't feel that way.
Would like to trust our politicians, but experience teaches...
Aloha
Aloha
Gordy

230RN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Total likes: 71
  • But they're [u]supposed[/u] to be military-style!
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2015, 12:03:45 AM »
Kinda old news, but well worth bumping.

Typically lawmakers only make the laws... They don't have to follow them.
There may be exceptions, but they are scarce.
Wish I didn't feel that way.
Would like to trust our politicians, but experience teaches...
Aloha

I'm pretty sure that Congress-critters are not subject to the "Affordable Health Care Act," but I'm not sure.  I think there are other laws that Congress people have exempted themselves from,  Might be interesting to find a list somewhere, but my google-fu sucks.

Terry, 230RN

I do believe that the radical and crazy notion that the Founders meant what they said, is gradually soaking through the judicial system.

mauidog

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2015, 12:19:23 AM »
Kinda old news, but well worth bumping.

I'm pretty sure that Congress-critters are not subject to the "Affordable Health Care Act," but I'm not sure.  I think there are other laws that Congress people have exempted themselves from,  Might be interesting to find a list somewhere, but my google-fu sucks.

Terry, 230RN

As far as ACA, Congress doesn't need an exemption since (a) they would never be required to cancel their existing coverages, (b) the law doesn't force everyone (yet) to join the exchanges, and (c) they don't individually employ the numbers of people required to fund healthcare for employees.

As for other laws, every major law that might get a Congressman in trouble in the course of their official duties (hiring staffers, etc.) has an exemption clause through 1995.  That included 2 versions of the civil rights act which requires no discrimination when hiring.

"Pressure on Congress mounted and finally, in 1995, with Republicans in control of the House and Senate, the Congressional Accountability Act was passed, eliminating the congressional exemption for all workplace laws and regulations. Some thought passage of the law marked the end of congressional exceptionalism through exemption. They were mistaken."

Quote
Insider trading (the buying and selling of stocks based on insider information not available to the general public) has been a violation of federal securities laws for almost 80 years. Yet it was never illegal for members of Congress. Not, that is, until a November 2011 report by CBS's "60 Minutes" shamed Congress into changing the law to prohibit members of Congress and their staffs from trading on inside information. The report was largely based on research conducted by the Hoover Institution's Peter Schweizer for his book, "Throw Them All Out," published that same month. Speaking about the legislators capitalizing on their positions, Mr. Schweizer told Steve Kroft on the program: "This is a venture opportunity. This is an opportunity to leverage your position in public service and use that position to enrich yourself, your friends and your family."

Six months after the "60 Minutes" segment with Mr. Schweizer aired, Congress passed and the president signed the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012, which bans insider trading by lawmakers and their staffs. But just last week, while voters were focused on emotional issues such as immigration and gun control, House and Senate members voted to repeal a key provision of the so-called Stock Act—the one that required online posting of their staffs' financial transactions.

So, as many times as there have been attempts to make Congress obey laws, there have been at least as many successful attempts to repeal or at least water down the laws for Congress members.

I always thought "member" was an adequate description of those in Congress, gender notwithstanding!   :rofl:

This article has a list of significant laws affecting or affected by Congressional noncompliance.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjPkLDG2uzJAhUIbiYKHUxdDPEQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB10001424127887324504704578413182814140480&usg=AFQjCNFnqawq2z5bhihl0TB1GTMFkFuHKg&sig2=oymK5cfzjS8GodoVcozHWw
« Last Edit: December 21, 2015, 12:25:08 AM by mauidog »
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper

230RN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
  • Total likes: 71
  • But they're [u]supposed[/u] to be military-style!
  • Referrals: 2
    • View Profile
Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2015, 12:32:57 AM »
Quote
I always thought "member" was an adequate description of those in Congress, gender notwithstanding!   :rofl:

I see what you did there.  Double roffle.

Thanks for the info.  Stuff like that should be easier to find, I guess.

Terry, 230RN

I do believe that the radical and crazy notion that the Founders meant what they said, is gradually soaking through the judicial system.

mauidog

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2015, 12:38:58 AM »
I see what you did there.  Double roffle.

Thanks for the info.  Stuff like that should be easier to find, I guess.

Terry, 230RN

I won't tell you it was the first link returned in my Google search, then!

My Google-Fu is very strong   O0
An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it.   -- Jeff Cooper

Inspector

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2015, 06:50:06 AM »
...I always thought "member" was an adequate description of those in Congress, gender notwithstanding!   :rofl: ...

When I refer to the congress critters I prefer to use the word "Tool" to describe them.  :rofl:  Gender notwithstanding.  >:D
SCIENCE THAT CAN’T BE QUESTIONED IS PROPAGANDA!!!

oldfart

Re: Is this guy a terrorist or what?!
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2015, 07:49:03 AM »
As far as ACA, Congress doesn't need an exemption since (a) they would never be required to cancel their existing coverages, (b) the law doesn't force everyone (yet) to join the exchanges, and (c) they don't individually employ the numbers of people required to fund healthcare for employees.

I always thought "member" was an adequate description of those in Congress, gender notwithstanding!   :rofl:



https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjPkLDG2uzJAhUIbiYKHUxdDPEQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Farticles%2FSB10001424127887324504704578413182814140480&usg=AFQjCNFnqawq2z5bhihl0TB1GTMFkFuHKg&sig2=oymK5cfzjS8GodoVcozHWw
==============
excellent humor :thumbsup:
What, Me Worry?