Two significant issues that were covered during the interview but not aired:
First, criminal and self-inflicted acts are not covered under any liability coverage. You use your car in a bank robbery and total it, not covered under your existing (and mandatory) automobile coverage. So, the vast majority of gun shot incidents, being either a result of criminal endeavors or suicide, would not be covered.
Second, the issue of re-registration has been litigated before. Under the US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit, under "Heller II" any re-registration scheme was deemed unconstitutional. So, this legislator wants to introduce a bill that would incur massive costs associated with accommodating a huge logistical and administrative burden and that would certainly be challenged in court (and have a very good chance of being ruled unconstitutional) thereby incurring even more costs.....