can they bilk anymore money from citizens who abide by the law. How about stupidity insurance or liabilty insurance for bicycles or wheelchairs..... AHHH cmon!

And now we know how they intend to pay for all the extra officers needed to handle the registrations ( 200k per year)

Measure Title:   RELATING TO FIREARMS.
Report Title:   Firearms Registration Fee; Firearms Permit to Acquire Fee; Counties
Description:   Allows each county council to establish a processing fee for a firearms permit to acquire and firearm registration.

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=196

What kind of F*cking idiocy is this? 

OK, let's assume that idiot boy gets his bill passed. We, the law abiding gun owners go and get our "insurance".

What about the criminals, you know, the people that are MOST likely to actually SHOOT someone?

They aren't going to have "insurance" because they don't give a F*ck about following laws! Much like people that drive without insurance.

Once again the propensity to penalize legal gun owners, without having ANY effect on crime or criminals comes out.

The laws that "hold people responsible" for shooting someone already exist, the only people that I see benefitting from something like this are, you guessed it, criminals that get shot by law abiding citizens.

This moron should be brought to range, so that we can all line up to slap his head. In fact, let's get a law passed for that. Call it the " Propose stupid legislation and Get Slapped by all of your Constituents" statute.

Stupidity should hurt.

i aint gettin no stinkin insurance.

And now we know how they intend to pay for all the extra officers needed to handle the registrations ( 200k per year)

Measure Title:   RELATING TO FIREARMS.
Report Title:   Firearms Registration Fee; Firearms Permit to Acquire Fee; Counties
Description:   Allows each county council to establish a processing fee for a firearms permit to acquire and firearm registration.

http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=196

I can't even imagine how these idiots got it to carry over. The SCOTUS has already ruled on this, Murdock v Pennsylvania 319 us 105.

It's not legal to charge for exercising a right protected by the Constitution.  More F*cking idiocy. 

This moron should be brought to range, so that we can all line up to slap his head. In fact, let's get a law passed for that. Call it the " Propose stupid legislation and Get Slapped by all of your Constituents" statute.

Stupidity should hurt.

..
That's so funny. Can I be first in line?

..
That's so funny. Can I be first in line?

No. I'm first. Don't worry, I'll leave some for you. 

I'm very angry with these legislators.
They can ball my wife if they want to.
But they can not take away my RIGHTS!



these stupid legislators need to take their heads out of their asses

Doesn't homeowners insurance already cover this type of thing?

Nice to see a representative from HRA speak in opposition to this bill on the HNN news at 9.

"What is caliber you're looking for?" Lol

Officer Chu also had a second on TV.

Doesn't homeowners insurance already cover this type of thing?

Do you have home owners insurance?

Do you have renters insurance?

Do you have home owners insurance?

Do you have renters insurance?

Really Doug?

Can you take a break from trolling EEF?

Really Doug?

Can you take a break from trolling EEF?

He asked questions.  I asked him questions to find out his level of knowledge on home owners and renters insurance so I know where he's coming from.

How is that trolling?

If he's never had insurance, it makes a difference in how much background or how detailed the answer needs to be.

I think you're overreacting to my response.   

Really Doug?

Can you take a break from trolling EEF?

You know what?  On second thought, instead of attacking me, why don't you answer his questions from now on?  Start with this one.  That is, unless you have nothing useful to add other than accusing me of trolling.

I'm through.  You don't want me here on this forum, I'm glad to oblige.

Adios.

He asked questions.  I asked him questions to find out his level of knowledge on home owners and renters insurance so I know where he's coming from.

How is that trolling?

If he's never had insurance, it makes a difference in how much background or how detailed the answer needs to be.

I think you're overreacting to my response.   

You always want to go back and forth with him and muck up a lot of threads. Give it a break or PM him.

I took EEF's ? as rhetorical

I take your ?'s as trolling, you didn't ask like how you said above to solicit information.
 
Not every ? needs a Darmok answer, especially every EFF?

Anyhow have a good night. I am gonna spit the hook out now, I don't want to go back and forth with you.

Hopefully I can meet you one day and we won't be anonymous on the interwebs. Still waiting to for you to take up the offer for lunch at DL.

I saw Macsak's girlfriend 

I saw Macsak's girlfriend 

He went back to girls??

He went back to girls??

I think she can bring any guy back to girls; even Mac.

Probably can bring girls to girls, but thought is for another time.

He asked questions.  I asked him questions to find out his level of knowledge on home owners and renters insurance so I know where he's coming from.

How is that trolling?

If he's never had insurance, it makes a difference in how much background or how detailed the answer needs to be.

I think you're overreacting to my response.   

Mauidog, I've always appreciated your posts. They are informative and thoughtful.

So how's this Friday for lunch?